«Although the sincerity of a person's belief that a religious practice must be observed is relevant to whether the person's right to freedom of religion is at issue, an infringement of this right can not be established
without objective proof of an interference with the observance of that practice.
Those who believe that
without objective proof, we're all just being delusional are fundamentalists — they're just non-theistic fundamentalists.
Not exact matches
Without objective and indefatigable
proof of the non-existence of Satan the argument about Jesus hallucinating is an expression of an opinion of what the truth is, not a fact.