Sentences with phrase «without personal bias»

The sheriff who launched the probe defended the inquiry, saying in a statement: «I took an obligation in my oath as Sheriff to enforce the law equally and fairly without any personal bias or prejudice.

I'm not a scientist but I'm good with words and logic so I can take the science provided by others and look at it in new ways to try and formulate a coherent whole without a personal bias towards any specific outcome.

While I have potential Beta Readers among friends, family, and my Writer's Group (and anyone here willing to take up the cause), where do I find a complete strangers to read without personal bias?

Not exact matches

Staying curious is important, but doing so alone without conferring with others or accepting outside perspectives limits you to personal bias.

With so many things being reported in the world, it is difficult to process information accurately and holistically without being impacted by personal biases.

I propose a counter thesis, that there can be no real love without the rational function which aims to transcend personal bias, and which assesses objectively the human situation, including that of the lover, the beloved, and their relationship.

Repeating personal biases without proof is junk science.

And as a matter of FYI, I ran this article past someone who was a reporter for both newspaper and TV, to see if it was accidentally biased for or against self - publishers or trad publishers, which it was never meant to be and as I suspected, this person said that it wasn't and that anyone who read it objectively without any prior personal agenda would see this.

***** This statement is made without assuming Germany creates the bomb and wipes out the coasts before hand and is based off of pure warfare and technology at hand at the time ***** Also in this day and age I would caution anyone to assume «journalists» are professionals in their craft anymore and research topics objectively without throwing in personal bias.

This bias later evolved into «Post-Painterly Abstraction», an art of Geometric forms without any personal handwriting by the painter.

This flawed foundation becomes the foundation of confirmation bias, some (others) start feeding in money for their own personal ends, and the process starts to snowball — without necessarily any malicious intent on the science side.

Without this important skill, a social worker might miss clues, overlook opportunities, or act on personal bias.

I have daily practices that serve to develop a larger capacity to hold and be present with the pain and suffering a client might be experiencing in an accepting manner without bias, or personal reactivity.

On the issue of «science» in general, many MHPs (the author believes Gould as well) hold personal biases in favor of joint custody (with or without rationales such as «as a default starting point» or «because it appears to be public policy» etc.).

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.

In the latter case, a few bureaucrats exercise their bias without personal accountability for what unforseen (to their minds) negative consequences could develop for consumers financially / legally.

Rarely do most of my personal detractors come back at me with anything other than biased thinking without actual empirical backup.