Not exact matches
I really don't understand now (I am far less naive) how people would sign up for a seminar
without actually
seeing documented
proof that the mentor / teacher is doing deals.
but we can
see this scientific
proof, just because you're too stupid to understand it doesn't mean you can use the argument that everyone else believes it
without seeing it
There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things
without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal
proof that God exists, but
proof for me may not be
proof for you, some people can
see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...
It would be foolish to follow something
without proof (would you spend a million dollars
without seeing it in your bank account first?).
Tom tom: I'm sure you accept many things
without absolute
proof - for example, you probably accept that matter is made of atoms which you can not
see; you probably accept that gravity is not going to disappear tomorrow; you probably believe that testing a theory over and over will yield reliable results.
Every last exhaustive
proof reveals that everything we
see and know is the result of the natural, and yet you appeal to the supernatural and metaphysical
without justification.
What religion offers: — The opportunity to avoid eternal punishment for not worshiping / believing in my god (not worried enough to care)-- An explanation for the universe and why we are here (I'll take the knowledge gained from the application of the scientific method, but thanks)-- Living forever in heavenly bliss (I am content with this life)-- The opportunity to divide humanity based upon different belief systems (There is enough dividing us already)-- Purpose, a code of ethics, and fulfillment (I have that already,
without religion)-- Develop a personal relationship with god (I've never
seen or heard from any gods nor have I
seen any independantly verified scientifically collected peer reviewed
proof.
what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no
proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me,
without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I
see, I
see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to
see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.
God could make himself as obvious as gravity (since he made gravity as obvious as he made gravity), but he doesn't, and so there's no way to determine whether or not god exist and we continue to debate him
without any solid
proof or meaningful evidence (like we
see in biology and chemistry and such).
See that's faith what you just described, because it happened before your time you want more
proof for your eyes... He Einstein didn't really have any
proof now science is confirming him so maybe after death you get the
proof... Live life joyously
without regrets you may get no other.
Even Isaiah could not muster up the words to describe what God looks like and our smartest scientists today think quantum theory sounds very impressive to explain
without proof the unknowable and that which can not be
seen
See,
without proof, its just another story.
They know what they believe, and they understand that they will live their entire lives
without ever
seeing a shred of
proof of God's existence.
As can be
seen from the images above, both solutions baby
proof the area
without being invasive and
without altering the home's style and aesthetic.
One child
proofing trick is to use installed safety gates as barriers for the pets so they can
see the family
without being?
As critics blast the parent trigger as harmful and ineffective, the group
sees the latest West Athens development as a sign that the parent trigger can evolve into a more collaborative mechanism for achieving changes, and
proof that the law can force schools to take parents seriously
without a divisive fight, said Gabe Rose, Parent Revolution's deputy executive director.
So I can not
see how you believe these figures are simply made up «claims»
without any
proof.
The first, and probably most important, was that there wasn't a lot of content; publishers weren't exactly eager to post their bestselling titles
without seeing concrete
proof of how... [Read more...]
The first, and probably most important, was that there wasn't a lot of content; publishers weren't exactly eager to post their bestselling titles
without seeing concrete
proof of how the compensation would pay out, and letting members pay a low monthly fee for Netflix - style consumption didn't suit them.
You can STILL apply and get a title loan
without the
proof of registration but in some cases we will ask to
see it.
I just do not
see how someone can fraudulently take out a loan
without showing some sort of
proof of person.They have been informed of this and a fraud package is being sent to me, but it seems the security of loans should be higher.
We will not dispense heartworm prevention to animals that have not been
seen by our doctors and
without heartworm testing or
proof of current negative heartworm test.
I offer of
proof McIntyre's work on MBH (
see climateaudit.org) The IPCC adopted bogus science
without checking... shame!!!
I've never ever
seen any climate feedback equation that includes the time dependent response; just a static condition,
without any
proof that the feedback system is stable.
Fred, I go by what I read: to invite you to develop a reasoned and lightly referenced argument for and against the proposition highlighted in the extract below — «the null hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of
proof on showing that there is no human influence»... Both essays would be written «blind» — i.e.,
without seeing the others» essay — They do not state what the null hypothesis is.
I submit that it doesn't take a Rocket Engineer to
see that the entire debate can not reach closure
without admitting that a
proof is possible and defining what future data could disprove the scientific theory.
I have only
seen that he has repeatedly made this assertion
without providing any
proof.
zk - SNARK (Zero - Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge) is a
proof structure where sender and receiver both can
see the content of the transaction, while the network validates it
without the need to reveal information.
«Hard Working Realtor: one who hides behind his mother's skirt, sometimes even under it; one
without a sense of identity, a faceless, nameless acronym of a hollow shell; not a
see shell, but a no -
see - um shell; a wing - nut
without wings; a wannabe marine armed with a pea - shooter; a denizen of the deep living in a leaky urine - hued yellow submarine with special krill -
proof screen doors; a wannabe flying fish turned acronymphomaniac.