So little is written about end of life moments, the bulk of what I come across seems to be fervently focused on what's important in the here and now to the author
without seeing the forest for the trees.
Not exact matches
Recent debates in the pages of First Thingsand other conservative journals over Darwin's theory of evolution and creationism reveal the degree to which Catholics seem stuck in the
trees for want of
seeing the
forest, the lopsided degree to which the Church gives assent to philosophy
without deeply exploring the particular science it considers a threat, (this journal, it goes
without saying, excepted).
But you can't save pandas
without saving the ecosystem they depend on, and the pull of the rare panda (or mountain gorilla or California condor) sometimes produces interventions that don't
see the
forests for the
tree frogs.
Without asking this question, doctors can't
see the
forest for the
trees.