Sentences with phrase «without seeing them i think»

Yes, without seeing them I think if you change cabinets in some areas it definitely makes sense to change colors.

Yes, without seeing them I think if you change cabinets in some areas it definitely makes sense to change colors.

Not exact matches

«However, I would like it on the record — as an expert who has thought about these issues nearly every working hour over the last four years — that I'm convinced that without the SPV and 12g fixes, retail investors will be heavily disadvantaged as compared to accredited investors and equity crowdfunding will ultimately be seen as a failure.

You begin to plan your work for the day, and when you continue to do it over and over again, you can begin to see you are working the plan you have set for yourself without thinking about it.

So, without a doubt, we're watching it very closely and I think it's going to be really interesting to see as they become more regulated and as they become more of a focus for regulators how that's going to change just the use of data that we have as marketers.

The system can think faster than any human, «sees» without blinking, never gets tired or irritable or intoxicated — and is never, ever tempted by a smartphone.

Other companies with world - class R&D groups built radical innovations only to see their company fumble the future and others reap the rewards (think of Xerox and the personal computer, Fairchild and integrated circuits, Kodak and digital photography, etc.) Common themes in these failures were, 1) without a direct connection to the customer advanced R&D groups built products without understanding user needs, and 2) the core of the company was so focused on execution of current products that it couldn't see that the future didn't look like the past.

Without any rationale thinking and fueled solely by emotions is the very reason why you see people try short - term fad diets and other questionable health choices along with poor business decisions.

He just saw a little trash... and picked it up without thinking.

If you think you fall in that camp, see a doctor, who can remove excess wax without damaging your ear.

It's also the Customer Support team's job to ascertain that they choose the right path to get that outcome, so they might want to engage their users, but they don't want to have their users upset about being spammed, so it's our team's job to say again, «I can see why you might think that emailing five times in the first five days is good, but here's a few ideas about how you'll get to where you want to get to without doing the things that upset customers.»

When you allow your creativity to operate without boundaries and think adventurously, you will see connections you would not ordinarily see.

Since Help Scout is a help desk, it would be foolish to claim that I'm approaching this without a slight brush of bias, but I promise you my stance comes from experience; specifically, seeing new founders suggest to other new founders why they think a convoluted system of Gmail filters is «okay for now.»

«I think it's [been] two and a half years since I have joined [Facebook], and I think the biggest change I've seen in this period is that Facebook is [now] a mobile - first company, without question,» she says.

If you can run carefully structured promotions, like I outlined in my last column, Fresh Thinking for Uncertain Times, and see a bit of a pop in your business without eroding margins, I would go that route.

They made a huge mistake with the auto - upgrade without permission (my kids are now seeing ads that they hadn't been exposed to before; THINK ABOUT THESE THINGS ahead of time Mozilla!).

«I think no deal is probably better for the longer - term because it continues this process of rebalancing and there is no rebalancing without pressure and pressure comes through lower oil prices, through tighter credit and we're seeing all of that playing out nicely,» he said.

After shaking her way through her first class, Shelley saw immediate changes in her post-baby physique she did not think possible without interval and weight training.

At that point, it was about masturbation only (no one had made a comparison to homosexuality), so, without much personal stake in the debate, I thought to myself «See, this is why people don't like the answers, not (always) because it doesn't let them do what they want, but because the answers are sometimes very poor indeed.»

Which things being without number in our mind itself, (the nature of which mind is incapable of being seen,) not to mention others, the very faith whereby we believe, or the thought whereby we know that we either believe any thing, or believe not, being as it is altogether alien from the sight of those eyes; what so naked, so clear, what so certain is there to the inner eyes of our minds?

He said: «The fact that the football tournament ended on Sunday without any incident, I think probably the police and security force said «We can relax a little bit now; we got through this tournament without any terror attack» but of course we had this horrific terror attack that was saw last night.

Robert See, I find that anyone who denies what scientific evidence objectively reveals in favour of what they personally think must be correct without any evidence whatsoever must be operating out of the same harmful pride you're talking about.

I'm not crazy about mass emails, so I thought I'd give it a shot and see how many would enter without being informed via email, but just by visiting my site and discovering the contest.

@cbinal If I saw you reading the bible at work, I would think of you differently, without a doubt.

But without the wheel we would never have thought of linking wheels in pairs, and without our predecessors» invitation to use their shoulders we would not have thought a further seeing possible, perhaps not even conceived of it.

Well, God is invisible, but if we start loving or giving Him without expecting anything in return, and falling in love with God is like dancing with Him under the stars at night, sharing with Him our headaches, heartaches, and let God take care of them when we feel overwhelmed, feel His love through watching a beautiful sunset, paying attention to out of the blue thought when we least expect it, talk to God, and most of all, laugh and see our hearts dance with joy when we interact with God.

---------- Let's think about this, go back to my post and you will see that I said there are other dating systems other than the 6000 year dating system of Bishop Usser:...... «Without a doubt Bishop Usser's dating system is very wrong.

Personally i think those specific prayers are a distraction most of the times we pray these prayers because its what we think we need and often thats not the case.The better way is to just trust the holy spirit let him lead i think we miss the awesomeness of doing it Gods way its easy not difficult.The struggle is difficult when we are walking by the flesh and trying to do it our way.When i got to the point where i said to the God i am not going to do it my way anymore and i submit to you because know whats best for me.Change me and when i feel the wrong desires or temptation to walk by the flesh i just say Lord you know i am weak and i can not live a christian life without you help me.As soon as i do that it is effortless theres no struggle thats how we should grow.I am excited with what God is doing in my life he has opened his word i am seeing the fruit of his life impacting mine and i am changing day by day.I am walking by faith and not slipping back into my old desires i know what it means to be an overcomer sin does not have dominion over me anymore.In myself i can not boast because it is the power of God at work in my life and i give all the praise back to God.brentnz

And I see how it cripples a reasonable person's ability to think for themselves and to make decisions without the stamp of approval from some pastor, or leader or «the group.»

It is fortunate that we can see and think without understanding how seeing and thinking are possible!

Better to understand Chesterton's idea that Jews were not naturally a part of English culture without the inevitably determinative intervening lens of the Nazi holocaust, we might compare it with modern English perceptions of the problem of multiculturalism as it applies particularly to the Moslem community, still widely seen as being impossible to assimilate: thus, there is understood by many decent and tolerant people to be what might be termed a «Moslem problem» (just as many decent and tolerant gentiles in Chesterton's day thought there was a «Jewish problem»).

I think coming from a fundamentalist background, seeing the Greek philosophical uses of this terminology helps me recover a sense of a non-legalistic meaning and it avoids the problem of how you could be righteous without actually fully being so.

He could do such painting without reverence, but when you think of Millet's great works, that make his name immortal, that he loved, brooded over, and put himself into, you know that he inwardly bowed himself, like the worshipping figures of his «Angelus,» before the vision of beauty that he saw.

I think this is for two reasons: For the rst time people could see him directly, without a lter, and secondly, with this new assignment the real charisma of Joseph Ratzinger could emerge.

All I can say is that I've experienced what I've experienced, that there are certain things that can not be made known without first hand experience, and that if you happen to find yourself in a situation where you want to know or need to know something that can not be made known without first - hand experience there option of trying out for yourself and see if you like it, although I don't think there is any money - back guarantee, but then again I didn't have to pay any trial offer either.

But I think the difference is, and you can see it in some of the other commenters, challenging someone to change without condemning them.

If you look back where I first (I think) explored the analogy of performance, in a piece titled «Performing the Scriptures» (first published in 1982, reprinted in a collection called Theology on the Way to Emmaus in 1986), you will see that I contrast the notion of interpretation as performance not with the historian's craft but with the supposition that a text (any text, although it is with scripture that I am most concerned)-- a set of black marks on white paper — tells you how to take it, without any interpretative labor on the reader's part, a labor for which the reader must take personal responsibility.

As long as I have known him, I don't think I ever saw him without that smile.

If you, my listener, should see such a man, although it is unlikely, for without a doubt weakness and mediocrity are the more common, if you should meet him in what he himself would call a weak moment, but which, alas, you would have to call a better moment; if you should meet him when he had found no rest in the desert, when the giddiness passes away for a moment and he feels an agonizing longing for the Good; if you should meet him when, shaken in his innermost being, and not without sadness, he was thinking of that man of single purpose who even in all his frailty still wills the Good: then you would discover that he had two wills, and you would discover his painful double - mindedness.

If you think it is possible to wash and kiss a prisoners feet without feeling humility then I don't believe you... I challenge you to do it yourself for whatever reason you like to see that it is not without humility or providing a service for the good of others.

When they quote such a verse at us, we think that since it is Scripture, it must mean what the world says it means, and so we refrain from judging others, without ever looking up the passage to see what it really says.

If we believe in Jesus who said: I am the Way and the Truth, you can not see the truth without going through me» (it may not be correct word for word here, but I don't think it is more important than the true meaning of what is said by Jesus).

Following Jung's thought (without most of Jung's patriarchal biases) in seeing «masculine» and «feminine» components, he declared: «Only by accepting both the masculine and feminine principles, bringing them together, and harmonizing them within ourselves, will we be able to transcend the conditioning of our roles, and to express the whole range of our latent potential.»

Carolyn Bunting, from Internet Matters, told Premier: «Without parental controls in place, children can access content that's inappropriate like pornography, like violence, like crime... which I don't think parents would want their children to see.

In another he pillories the jerry - builder who scamps his foundations; and in yet another he notes the importance of drawing up an estimate before operations begin: «Would any of you think of building a tower without first sitting down and calculating the cost, to see whether he could afford to finish it?»

Hence, whereas we are freed by Whitehead to think of God as present in Jesus without reducing his full humanity, by itself this does not enable us to see any distinctiveness in God's presence in him.

From the point of view of process theology this change is a great gain, but it remains to be seen how fully it can be worked out without deeper alteration in the Kantian philosophy which thus far has shaped his thought.

I would have thought these things to be a comfort to anyone who just goes about their daily lives serving others without recognition and seeing others.

It should be easier to believe that at this point Whitehead was not thinking of events in nature as having subjectivity or experience, when we see how many thinkers today affirm the intrinsic value of the natural world and the interconnectedness of all things without taking this step.

Living a good life is NOT evangelism, I saw a sign that said «share the gospel, use words if necessary», «if» I thought, you can not share gospel which is Christ death and resurrection, without words unless you are a very talented mime artist.