Without stating the obvious, you can recreate this exact look pairing a boyfriend blazer with a feather skirt.
Law Practice Today, September 2011
Without stating the obvious — that a few hundred dollars to send members of your law firm to the ABA Law Firm Marketing Strategies Conference this November in Philadelphia is likely to provide a high ROI — the bottom line is, well, just that, the bottom line.
Not exact matches
It is overtly
obvious that the Framers wanted there to be separation of Church and
State as they valued freedom... it is the act of protecting those types of freedoms that makes our country so great today where people of ALL religions (or lack thereof) can come to the US and work to make it the best country on Earth
without fear of being persecuted for their beliefs.
The programme therefore had to be dressed up with the strong affirmation of great words: speeches on «open society, the sign of equality automatically placed between Market and Democracy, the elegy of the so - called deregulation which had come to be the synonym of liberty (
without clarifying whose), the anti-
state speeches, the
state which was considered to be the
obvious synonym of bureaucrats, autocrats and idiots, no longer the possible instrument of the management of historic social compromises, founded on democracy.
And
without wishing to
state the bleeding
obvious — wtf point is there even arguing the point, it is done, history, move on.
Without any stats to back my speculations, here are a few reasons why I would expect it to be that way:
Stating the
obvious but recent immigration to Europe included many people from countries where Islam is an important component of the culture (North Africa, West Africa, Turkey...) Christianity is on the retreat and losing ground to irreligion.
Immigration is the area where the mighty power of the
state is at its most
obvious: families are torn apart, people are locked up
without charge.
Plaintiff
states again that 2nd Defendant has not said a word against this marauding show of power
without any legal justification by the 1st Defendant's request of a deposit of filing fees for the 2016 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections thereby embolden 1st Defendant in perpetuating these
obvious illegalities against the political parties and individual candidates in this 2016 general elections.
«Successive governments of Nigeria have continued to deceive the gullible public that the reason we, IPOB, are agitating for Biafra is because of oil in the Niger Delta region,
without making
obvious the fact that oil was first found in commercial quantity in Imo
State before Oloibiri in Bayelsa
State.
You and your cohorts berated him for
stating the
obvious, claiming you could win
without him.
As with any change of voting system, it's hard to game the results
without stating other parameters that have been assumed, but there are a few key cases that are fairly
obvious.
The landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision Gideon v. Wainwright determined it to be an «
obvious truth» that criminal defendants can not get a fair trial
without a lawyer and mandated all
states under the Constitution to provide attorneys for defendants unable to afford their own lawyers.
Nonetheless, while the two
obvious thematic elements are clear: a) humankind reverts to a
state of barbaric nature; b) class warfare breaks out with contenders siding with their own kinds, «High - Rise» is simply unrestricted mayhem
without focus.
So when Harlem Success Academy, a charter group in New York, proposed to take over P.S. 194's building after the school was shut down for poor performance, the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) and the New York Civil Liberties Union took the
obvious step: they filed a lawsuit claiming that the
state pressed forward
without proper consultation with local school boards.
You may well be thinking we are
stating the
obvious with this post as «Quick Settings» are certainly not new to BlackBerry 10 and
without any apps open you can still perform a downwards swipe from the top bezel.
A recent study by Ohio
State University confirms what would seem to be pretty
obvious — microchipped pets have a better chance of being reunited with their owners than those
without microchips.
Uninspired articles that
state the
obvious without delving beneath the skin look like nothing more than cheap shots at getting their website, whether well - known or obscure, its 15 minutes of internet fame.
It should be pretty
obvious that we are looking forward to the future
without having to literally
state this.
Mad enviros give Soros and Hansen and Suzuki others who incite violence through divide and rule tactics a bad name, so I guess they have to be shot beofre it become
obvious that «green» equals Malthusian depopulation to those who need little to push them over the edge anyway, as well as to many seemingly «sane» greens now advocatin the greening of hatred, and its efficacy in immigration policy — a separate topic but how convenient to have a target that has to «go» first, because they are «worse» than «us»??? Exactly how did poverty level immigrants often
without any cars become the main culprit polluters in the USA, more recently the Un-united
States of Annihilism?
Granted, there is the
obvious downside of not being able to do anything with your wealth of knowledge
without risking some
state bar deciding you're engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and getting all up in your face.
In BP Refinery (Westenport) Pty Limited v Shire of Hastings [1977] 52 ALJR 20, Lord Simon, giving the opinion of the majority of the Privy Council, summarised the
state of the law as he then understood it: «For a term to be implied, the following conditions (which may overlap) must be satisfied: (1) it must be reasonable and equitable; (2) it must be necessary to give business efficacy to the contract, so that no term will be implied if the contract is effective
without it; (3) it must be so
obvious that «it goes
without saying»; (4) it must be capable of clear expression; (5) it must not contradict any express term of the contract.»
The four - step approach to obviousness adopted by the Court is as follows: (1)(a) Identify the notional «person skilled in the art»; (b) Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person; (2) Identify the inventive concept of the claim in question or if that can not readily be done, construe it; (3) Identify what, if any, difference exists between the matter cited as forming part of the «
state of the art» and the inventive concept of the claim or the claim as construed; (4) Viewed
without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been
obvious to the person skilled in the art or do they require any degree of invention?
In Hunt v. Carey Canada Ltd., 1990 CanLII 90 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959 — still the leading case on the plain and
obvious test — it was
stated that, for this purpose, pleadings are to be read generously
without regard to drafting deficiencies, and that questions that are important and difficult should be left to be dealt with on the basis of a full evidentiary record at trial.
The format, content, strategy, headline, everything about document itself
states the objective clearly
without taking up valuable real estate
stating the me - centric
obvious.
If, the Competition Bureau doesn't think that Realtors classes are necessary, why can't Realtors disassociate themselves from all the boards and just work as whatever the word would be — Realors - ish because for sale by owners are told they can do whatever they want, keep the commission portion (varying but that should be a
stated and
obvious deemed amount)
without paying taxes which they should have to pay taxes on — and also, again, be deemed anticompetitive if they refuse to pay a Realtor a portion of if buyers want to use a Realtor to buy a particular for sale by owner home.