Sentences with phrase «without the sin of»

I'm without the sin of sack - touching young boys I was in a position of power over.

Not exact matches

For instance, «someone has to pay for a mover and cough up the security deposit because you're not necessarily going to get it back from the original apartment if the other person is staying,» says Wynne Whitman, attorney at the law firm Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP and coauthor of Shacking Up: The Smart Girl's Guide to Living in Sin Without Getting Burned.

Worst of all, the contact had committed the sin of asking for something without giving or offering anything, or even demonstrating any caring for Sobel at all.

Why are you listening to black clerics over this issue, Blacks are having more kids out of wed lock than whites, they are also like white, living in sin, but the church's say nothing about having babies without a husband or sitting in church and living in sin, talk about glass houses, and besides the marriages are Cival marriage not religious marriage, what a bunch of hipocrites..

The entire Jesus dying for the sins of mankind relies on a literal Adam and Eve, without that there is no original sin and thus no need for Jesus.

In like manner, if I could not continue to unite with any smaller society, church, or body of Christians, without committing sin, without lying and hypocrisy, without preaching to other doctrines which I did not myself believe, I should be under an absolute necessity of separating from that society.

He even deleted whole pa.ssages like the story of the adulteress in the Gospel of John in which Jesus declares «Let him who is without sin cast the first stone» and Jesus's prayer on the cross, «Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing «since, according to Schlafly, «the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus did know what they were doing.

Regardless of some pagan uses in the past, Easter today is the day to remember and be thankful for a God who sent is only begotten son, who was without transgression, to die for our sins and then be raised from the dead that all who believe in Him may have eternal life.

The church website lists the congregation's beliefs: The Bible is «without error;» Jesus is the «sole basis for the forgiveness of sin,» and people are «incapable» of having a right relationship with God through their own efforts.

This confidence in leadership individuals to sin and violate the laws of our earth, and do anything they want without regard to expose themselves and whole societies to extreme danger against the upheaval that can be unleashed.

Augustine — being concerned with his «ascent» (a word used repeatedly in Book X) from sin to salvation — is preoccupied with the relationship between memory and sin: he makes a point of noting that we are able to remember our sins without committing them over again.

Jesus is our Savior... He paid the price for OUR sins and without a relationship with HIM... none of us shall enter the gates of Heaven.

Jesus was the voice of mercy here, «He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.»

I'm thankful for the air I breathe and can't imagine an existance without God even in the midst of sin.

God sacrificed his only son, the only innoce3nt human in history, he sufferd the shame of occupying a human body and then he lived his whole life without sin, and let himself be wrongly accused and executed that our sins may be traded and washed away by the blood of the lamb of God.

BUT, to stigmatize all those who are poor and pretend that if they are poor and have fallen thru the cracks, is their own fault and the consequences of their own doing or lack of providing for themselves,, is the SIN that this country will not shake of, it is a dark spot on this country's conscience, and it will not go without dire consequences....

Religion is one lie after another: the lie of original sin, the lie of eternal life, the lie of hell, the lie of answered prayer, the lie that life can have no meaning without religion, the lie that religion is the source of morality, the lie of creationism, the lie of a spy - in - the - sky who hears your every word and reads your every thought.

Without hômosèxuality being a sin, the whole bigotted house of cards collapses.

But tragic is he who lives beneath the weight of some unforgivable act, living without consciousness of the damage of his sin.

No one wants to be one of the dry bones, wells without waters, spiritually walking dead among us like the non-believers on this site that end up in the eternal flames, blotted out, no eternity unless they repent, ask Jesus for forgiveness and sin no more.

While the Church does teach absolution of sin, she certainly does NOT teach a penitent can carry forth without consequence.

Truth without the empathy of seeing our own sins revealed in the sins of others lacks the necessary love part.

However, if you are referring to «different» as someone who wants to continue to practice sin without the fear of being confronted, then that is a different fishing trip.

Agreed, save I thought the adultress (of «let he who is without sin throw the first stone» fame) was added to John in about 700 AD, not Matthew, no?

If you can, Chuckles, try to imagine this life without sin, and you will have a discription of heaven and the new earth.

If a man has lived a life of cruelty and then has a change of heart, is truly sorry for his sins and then dies (the proverbial «deathbed conversion») he can «be saved» without having done a good work in his life.

You are correct that without faith there is no benefit to being dunked in water, but with faith we are baptized «for the forgiveness of sins» not «in order to make a public declaration.»

If that is offensive, intolerant, or unacceptable to anyone, then they can choose to join a social club, support group, or any other number of options, but the true church will stand her ground and preach the infallible Word of God without fear or favor in love for lost humanity and a with a real hatred of sin that destroys and condemns.

Without God (who has revealed himself through the Bible) we wouldn't be aware of our sin.

If it's time to bring awareness to their hearts through a gentle, probing question, then remaining in acceptance without conviction of sin only blocks them from encountering the Good News.

Can you explain how a locked door can be flung open in the act of doing a sin, without any wind present?

I would also describe the elder as someone created in the image of God and not without sin.

It's the other way around — we are saved from hell, forever made a child of God, so we are «free» to sin without sacrificing that position.

He founded his plan «before the foundation of the world» (Ephesians 1:4, & cf, Jn 1, Philippians 2) upon Lord Jesus, «the first born of creation» (Colossians 1), born from Mary conceived without sin.

Without the prompting of the Holy Spirit we would not be conscious of our sin.

Though he was without sin, he knew firsthand the consequences of sin, since he became sin for us (2 Cor.

While I believe the Bible is true and without error, the most important thing to believe is that God send His son, Jesus, to die for our sins, and the Blood that Jesus shed on the Cross washes us of all our sins and God remembers those sins no more.

One reason is because of Hebrews 9:22 which says that without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness of sins.

It was so that He could defeat sin, death, and devil by taking all the violence upon Himself without retaliating in any way, but forgiving and reconciling instead, thus showing the powerlessness and emptiness of the way of violence.

But what I said was that those who choose to sin again and again without thought of the consequences (again I don't know a practicing Christian who does, but I think most self identified Christians fall under that category) give me reason to question their salvation.

In fact, his initial contact is often without mention of sin at all.

I am convinced that no movement will move ahead well without dealing with the sins of its past.

He isn't going to say today and tomorrow that «without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins», but then yesterday have an alternative sin offering that didn't involve the shedding of blood.

Some things are a battle but the Lord does tell he «he doesn't give us more than we can bare» — Sometimes it takes deliverance or a walk of learning how to live without certain sins.

The «Conviction of «Sin»» (I.E. esse: «essence,» «being») an immaculate concept flying in on the wings of a dove, say: certainly nothing one would conjure up without the help of Goedel's Theorem, might as well ask Joe Fish to define wet let alone conceive of dry: it makes no common sense.

Jesus said it best of the woman caught in adultery, «Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.»

The Christian life is not about tolerance... but truth... The Bible is quite specific about what sin is... we must love the sinner but not tolerate the sin... being a Christian requires us to know and speak the truth in love... tolerance means accepting everything without judgment... we can not do that in this society in the midst of moral decay.

Homosexual behaviors, and same - sex marriage may be a «sin», it may be «evil», it may be «unjust» [by man's definition or even by God's definition]... but, without tangible victims beyond any reasonable doubt, I must therefore default to the teachings of Jesus, and ensure that their marriage receives all the Federal, State, and local «blessings» that every marriage receives.

God created humanity without those things until humanity rejected God and sin was woven into every fiber of creation.

Hence Niebuhr's famous line: «A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.»