Sentences with phrase «without valid evidence»

Without valid evidence that GW is net harmful, there is no justification of the belief that GHG emissions are harmful — and no evidence to support the 2C political target and belief it is dangerous.

Not exact matches

Its also the people who think they can simply turn around any argument aimed at their group, as if that were valid without actual evidence.

fred, you are merely inventing a straw man and assigning it all your fears and frustrations without actually having a single shred of evidence that your scenario could even remotely be valid.

Today, yeast is used almost universally, without any testing, and the recent scientific evidence and clinical findings are confirming the ancient taboos with biochemical and bioelectronics valid proofs that wholly support the age - old common sense.

If you do not embrace this, you will simpl6 be one of the thousands upon thousands of health sites unable or unwilling to do more than peddle hype... your claims may be valid but without evidence of thier validity and openess to questions, give replies with respect... then a website of hype it will be reasonably viewed as.

This linkage was done without any scientific or research - based evidence that such a link was valid, reliable, or fair for the purpose of teacher evaluation.

Once again, the authors are applying methods developed by others in ways different from their original intent without acknowledging as much, and without providing evidence that such an application is valid.

Were it true it would be valid and he stated that the Earth's mantle was a far greater repository of carbon than the crust, at least 7 fold greater, yet without any evidence to support that claim.

I realize it's kind of late for making suggestions, but here goes anyway: Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.It looks like you have addressed T&G's main arguments (eg, about the 2nd law), but I wonder if it might be appropriate to put in a brief description of what it means to «falsify» something in the scientific sense — ie, essentially what T&G must show (and failed to show) to make their case that there is no greenhouse effect: namely, 1) experimental evidence that shows the opposite of what an atmospheric greenhouse effect would necessarily produce and / or 2) evidence that the greenhouse effect would actually violate some physical law (eg, 2nd law of thermo) The pot on the stove example is obviously an attempt to show that you get a colder temp with the water than without, but I think it's worthwhile explicitly stating that «because T&G failed to demonstrate that the pot on the stove example is a valid analogy for the earth, they failed to falsify the atmospheric greenhouse effect» And you could also add a sentence stating that «because T&G failed to show that the greenhouse effect would require a violation of the 2nd law [because their arguments were incorrect], they also failed to falsify»

I assert (without evidence) that it would be equally valid and consistent, if not more so, if the Second Law were restricted to the regions where it actually holds.

Vision problems can interfere with the process of reading, but children with dyslexia or related learning disabilities have the same visual function and ocular health as children without such conditions; however, there is no valid evidence at this point that children who participate in vision therapy are more responsive to educational instruction than children who do not participate.

A claim can not be awarded without evidence that a person is the legal widow, widower or surviving civil partner or would have been but for the fact that they were divorced or the civil partnership was dissolved and the divorce or dissolution is recognised as valid in the State.