The real debate should be, how do we change our energy systems
without wrecking our economy — not whether or not global warming is happening.
Not exact matches
At stake, therefore, is how much can be paid
without wrecking Iceland's
economy.
The purest pleasures, though, are the quiet rewards of hard work and a tidy mind: colonies that stretch across an entire map, every section explored and covered with busy robots and busy people beetling away
without losing their minds or
wrecking the
economy.
We can not replace large (or significant) amounts of conventional technologies with wind and solar
without either
wrecking the
economy or degrading system reliability or both.
Since global warming skeptics are becoming an increasingly marginalized bunch, the are enough of us «wide eyed innocent little tree huggers» to push through our «
economy wrecking agendas»
without having to worry about you.
These campaigns always pretend to offer inspiration about we can do in America if we set our minds and hearts to it, but in fact the real message is what we can't do: we can't power America
without coal, we can't keep our lights on
without destroying Appalachia, and most important of all, we can't pass meaningful carbon legislation
without wrecking the American
economy.