It is also part of the parole officer work description to appears as
witness at court hearings in circumstances of parole revocation.
Report parolees who do not comply with conditions of release and appear as
witness at court hearings in the event of parole revocation
Not exact matches
At a
hearing in Moscow's Tverskoy District
Court to decide whether Magomedov and his associates should be detained before their trial, Judge Maria Sizintseva said they had acted as part of an organised crime group and had tried to put pressure on
witnesses.
Jacobs recanted some of his assertions as a
witness in a November
court hearing, leading a top Uber lawyer to describe the letter as an effort
at «extortion.»
During the
hearing last week, the
court heard evidence from Frost, Green and four character
witnesses, all of whom were shocked
at the allegation that Frost had faced, according to Christian Concern.
BRASILIA (Reuters)- Brazil's top electoral
court on Tuesday decided to
hear new
witnesses in an illegal campaign financing case that could remove President Michel Temer from office, delaying any verdict in the trial until
at least May.
At the resumed
hearing on the matter, yesterday, a
witness brought by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Mr. Yomi Badejo - Okusanya, told the Federal High
Court sitting in Abuja that the PDP spokesman used N77.5 million to sponsor media campaigns for the re-election of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan.
At the
hearing, the EFCC lawyer, Mr Johnson Ojogbane, expressed surprise over the absence of the prosecution
witness in
court.
DAILY POST recalls that while some of his
witnesses failed to show up
at the
court, those who were present disappeared before the
hearing.
At an Oyo State High Court sitting in Ibadan on Tuesday, three witnesses were presented by the prosecution at the resumed hearin
At an Oyo State High
Court sitting in Ibadan on Tuesday, three
witnesses were presented by the prosecution
at the resumed hearin
at the resumed
hearing.
At the resumed
hearing of the case on Wednesday, the EFCC prosecutor, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, sought the
court's permission to continue with the examination - in - chief of the first prosecution
witness.
At the resumed
hearing, the defence counsel, Abubakar Yusuf, who stood in for Ahmed Raji (SAN), informed the
court that the defence would not be able to cross examine the
witness due to Raji's absence.
This is often where
courts have erred, the PSPI authors note, allowing
witnesses to make confidence statements «
at pretrial
hearings or
at trial, well after the
witness might have undergone serious confidence inflation from repeated identifications, coaching, confirmatory feedback, and so on.»
So, to keep my running list current,
courts are not
at all interested in
hearing your clever rhetoric; your emotional exaggerations of how good, bad or ugly the other side's case is; or your disrespectful or uncivil language directed toward the
court, opposing counsel, parties,
witnesses or anyone else.
Today, in federal district
court in Wichita, Judge Monti Belot is holding a
hearing,
at which a government expert will apparently try to convince the judge that two defense
witnesses should be precluded from testifying
at trial, as «Rwandan
witnesses are inherently unreliable because they're controlled by the government of the African nation.»
At a normal bail
hearing, the Crown will inform the
Court of the police allegations, and it may involve you or your potential sureties giving evidence on the
witness stand to assist the
Court in making a decision.
In other words, it is likely that
courts will rely upon this provision, as well as article 279 (
hearing witnesses at a distance), to allow testimony by video - conference and other such things.
In Smuk, McFarlane J.A. stated
at paragraph three: When a
witness, whether an accused or not, sits in
court and
hears the testimony of another
witness on a subject matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conform.
«If an illness or a disability prevents a
witness from attending the
hearing, the
court, even on its own initiative, may order that the
witness be examined
at a distance using a technological means, or appoint a commissioner to take the
witness's testimony.
Regina v. Page - Cole (2008) Charges of Aggravated Assault withdrawn
at the preliminary
hearing in the Ontario
Court of Justice after detailed presentation of evidence undermining the evidence of the main Crown
witness.
Regina v. Szymanski (2007) Charges of Sexual Assault and Assault discharged
at the Preliminary
hearing in the Ontario
Court of Justice after extensive and detailed cross-examination of the Crown
witnesses including undermining the credibility of the complainant, and establishing that the complainant had motive to fabricate.
At a temporary hearing in Georgia, you are generally limited to the party (yourself) and one witness per party at a temporary hearing, unless the court makes an exceptio
At a temporary
hearing in Georgia, you are generally limited to the party (yourself) and one
witness per party
at a temporary hearing, unless the court makes an exceptio
at a temporary
hearing, unless the
court makes an exception.
Specific topics which have been covered in recent conferences include judicial ethics; interpreters; delivering reasons for judgment; assessing credibility; social media; technology and search warrants; managing a provincial offence trial; effectively communicating an oral judgment; risk assessment and indicators of lethality
at bail
hearings; the Youth Criminal Justice Act; eye -
witness identification; conducting pre-trials; specific issues
at trials of regulatory offences; fly - in -
courts, residential schools; application of Gladue principles; mistrials and bias; accident reconstruction; search warrant issues; domestic violence issues; orders for examination under the Mental Health Act; child apprehension warrants under the Child and Family Services Act; evidentiary issues; discrimination and harassment in the workplace; stress management; and pre-retirement planning.
«Imagine a
court hearing where a
witness enters the courtroom and one of the litigants in the case approaches the
witness and says «This doesn't affect your testimony
at all, but here's $ 800,000 for you if this case happens to go my way.»
If the
Court is satisfied that no further argument or evidence than the parties can
at once adduce is required as may be sufficient for the decision of the suit and that no injustice will result from proceeding with the suit, the
Court may make a determination
at the «first
hearing», which takes place after the plaint and written statement have been filed, before the «
hearing of the suit» where
witnesses are examined.
It may comprise: advice on complying with pre-action protocols; exploring the different avenues available for alternative dispute resolution (ADR); providing clients with a glossary of terms they will be come across in the
court process; instruction sheets in plain English to explain aspects of procedure and the essential law to be applied (translated to be available in Welsh or foreign languages); how to provide disclosure; preparing
court documents such as
witness statements, case and costs summaries, chronologies and skeleton arguments; complying with the Rules in relation to service of documents, the preparation of statements of case, the appointment and instruction of expert
witnesses; the importance of CPR Pt 36; or how to prepare for and what to expect
at a financial dispute resolution (FDR) or a final
hearing / trial.
After 13 years the Mississippi Supreme
Court has finally conceded that Jeffrey Havard is entitled to a hearing at the trial court level on whether or not the new evidence about the expert witness Steven Hayne's testimony warrants a new t
Court has finally conceded that Jeffrey Havard is entitled to a
hearing at the trial
court level on whether or not the new evidence about the expert witness Steven Hayne's testimony warrants a new t
court level on whether or not the new evidence about the expert
witness Steven Hayne's testimony warrants a new trial.
The rules for summary trial (see Rule 216) also allow the
Court to issue orders requiring experts or
witnesses to be cross-examined live
at the
hearing.
[18] The
court heard from the defence expert medical
witness, Dr. Michael Ford, a spine and trauma surgeon
at Sunnybrook dealing with serious fracture cases.
Just as in traffic
courts in other areas of the state, you may present
witnesses and evidence
at a
hearing before an ALJ and be represented by an attorney.
At a
hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on
Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet,
witness after
witness testified about patent trolls who use the threat of ruinous defense costs to pressure companies into paying settlements on vague and overbroad patents.
WASHINGTON, DC — Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) Interim President Karen Pearl will testify next week as a public
witness at the Senate
hearings for Supreme
Court nominee John Roberts, PPFA announced today.
If the defendant makes a basic showing in the application that there is a basis for the
hearing, the
court will grant a
hearing at which the parties will have the right to testify, present other
witnesses, cross examine
witnesses, and present appropriate documentary evidence.
At the very least, the Collaborative Process avoids time and cost - consuming litigation and adversarial proceedings, such as depositions, examinations of multiple expert
witnesses, and the time consumed when attorneys have to be paid to wait for hours to be
heard, as well as the
court hearings themselves.