If this was a real - life scenario, my father in law would run screaming from the room — I'm pretty sure he's still upset
women got the vote.
«In this 100th anniversary year of
women getting the vote in New York State, New Yorkers will be able to send a strong message that they are fed up with corruption and dysfunction in Albany.»
At the weekend Hinds brought history to life and at a stroke did more than any of the recent Vote100 celebrations to show why it really matters that
women got the vote a century ago.
In the United States,
women got the vote in 1919 via the 19th Amendment.
It's been 100 years since
some women got the vote in the UK.
We pick up the trail of the female suffrage campaigner coined «Queen of the Mob» by the press, 100 years after (some)
women got the vote
Not exact matches
As it is, we've
got Gloria Steinem and Madeleine Albright telling young
women to
vote for Clinton because she's a
woman.
And for those of you keeping score at home,
women got the the right to
vote 97 years ago.
We should celebrate the anniversary of
women getting the right to
vote, but there's still work to be done.
It is the «if Ne «groes or
women get the right to
vote» or «if Hilary Clinton
gets in...»... or even «Don't let Al Gore in..
the unborn
get more rights then a living, breathing,
voting woman?
I'd
vote for a Mormon, Catholic, Jew, Muslim, white guy, black guy,
woman, gay, midget — anyone who can
get results.
One of my outside vendors told me that
women get what they deserve based on who they
vote for.
A candidate isn't going to
get anywhere with most conservative evangelicals if they support a
woman's right to chose, or if the candidate supports strict separation of church and state, and maybe even opposition to teaching Creationism is going to lose their
vote.
So even though I think abortion is morally wrong in most cases, and support more legal restrictions around it, I often
vote for pro-choice candidates when I think their policies will do the most to address the health and economic concerns that drive
women to
get abortions in the first place.
When I claim that label, I'm connecting not only with a number of active feminists who are working today to help
women, but with an ongoing history of feminists who
got women the
vote, who made birth control happen, who
got women into positions of power in the government, who worked to rectify racial inequality and fight against things like mandatory sterilization of welfare recipients.
I know that
votes like these can make Christian
women feel like less - than, but I believe, deep in my bones, that things will
get better for
women in the Church.
During the fight to
get the bill passed, North Carolina lawmakers
voted down amendments that would have created pro-choice alternatives such as «Trust
Women.
The US is quick to jump on Iran or Pakitan, but in those countries
women can: Go to School (including university),
Get a job,
Vote, Drive Cars, DO NOT have to wear a Burka (hijabs are RECOMMENDED NOT ENFOCED), do not have to be accompanied by a male reletive.
Well, we recently had our elections here in Rutherford County, and it's humbling and sad all at the same time ¯ humbling to see the number of folks who give themselves selfishly to causes they believe in, humbling to see men and
women subject themselves to the mauling they
get when they run for office, humbling to see folks waiting to
vote in the heat of this miserable Tennessee summer we're having, but also sad to see how insular and crimped a lot of us have become.
Petercha, I'll
vote for the person who has a clue and knows that there are no «unborn babies», that
women have a right to determine what is best for themselves, and that the government has no business regulating who can
get contraception.
We've managed to
get women the
vote in the civilized world in the last century, despite religious norms.
Once he's
got the
womens»
vote with this latest ruse, what's he going to do to
women?
I heard a journalist from the Vatican on the news yesterday saying that the next pope is going to have to draw a line in the sand to prevent
women from
getting ordained and
voting, etc., while at the same time make
women feel that they are still a part of the church.
Then they
get a
woman to run around with Mitt to try to
get the
woman vote.
I'm on the right, and while I certainly don't feel hate towards this
woman, it is clear that she is just a token black for Romney to try and
get some of the black
vote, which he has about 0 % of at the moment.
Then we are going to try to
get the Hispanics and
women and Blacks and moderates to
vote for either a religious extremist or a Mormon stiff in November.
«I would have and could have
voted to allow that to go through, if I felt like we had tightly defined the ability for a
woman and a doctor to be making this decision together and not have the Legislature
get too deep in the weeds of how we would describe when that was appropriate.»
So is he going to
get rid of
women's right to
vote too because it's not what HIS religion dictates?
As recently as the 1980s, female flight attendants in the United States could be fired if they
got married, and
women's right to
vote wasn't universally enforced in Switzerland until 1990.
The more we
vote, the more likely we are to
get mom - friendly,
woman - friendly policies.
When Sweden was debating nearly a century ago whether
women should
get the
vote, one argument against it was that elections would cost twice as much!
She should
get credit for taking on the Housewife's League, campaigning for
women's
votes in Switzerland and presenting her views in a persuasive Glaswegian style.
I'm heard that they are
getting nervous about the suburban
woman vote that has in recent years gone overwhelmingly for Dems.
Where once we had a great battle of ideologies in public life, between the socialist left and the capitalist right, between authoritarians and liberals, now we have only the coffee house gossip of whether Keith Vaz will
get a knighthood for his
vote on 42 days and the identities of the «thirty
women» Nick Clegg says he has slept with.
The
woman will only
get the
votes of those naive enough to think they can change the system, and those who are sexist enough to cast their
vote based on sex instead of issues.
Since the man has won in the past, the man has more experience, and everyone else is saying they will
vote for the man, the man will
get nearly all the
votes that would have otherwise gone to the
woman.
As she declared in her maiden speech: «
Women have
got a
vote now and we mean to use it.»
While he used the party as a way to highlight
women's issues and prove his campaign's socially liberal positions — and even
got Hillary Clinton to join him in touting it — critics dismissed the party as an effort to siphon
votes from the labor - backed Working Families Party.
«I think these two races are going to come down to who can
get the
vote out,» said Libby Post of Capital
Women, a progressive organization formed in response to Trump's election that's backing Doran and O'Connor.
Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul was among a group celebrating the centennial of New York
women getting the right to
vote in Kenmore Sunday.
We have seen labours idea of
getting women elected, thats failed, they were hand picked by Blair to
vote for him not to question him.
As the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment
gets closer, U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is calling for the creation of a national panel that would provide support to local interests seeking to educate people about the drive for
women's
voting rights.
When I asked Hochul about the change from opposing to supporting Gipson, she offered that she and Cuomo «feel very strongly that Senator Gipson will be the
vote we need to
get the full
Women's Equality Agenda through the legislature.»
This is a con artist trying to
get the
women's
vote when he has the worse record when it comes to hiring
women in his own administration and the ones who have worked for him have all run.
Robert Rich
got the nod for a second term as town justice with 1,751
votes on the Democratic, Republican, Working Families and
Women's Equality Party lines; two write - in
votes were cast.
He not only had Hillary, but also Bill Clinton appear at
get out the
vote rallies, he met with Orthodox Jewish leaders, and sent emails to
women voters touting his support for the Women's Equality Act, an issue he has campaigned for in bus tours across the s
women voters touting his support for the
Women's Equality Act, an issue he has campaigned for in bus tours across the s
Women's Equality Act, an issue he has campaigned for in bus tours across the state.
«This ad is made up entirely of lies because Jack Martins can't run on the truth, which is that his record consists of raising taxes in Mineola and
voting against
women every chance he
gets.
The state Conservative Party has now codified its threat that any lawmaker who
votes «yes» on gay marriage will be politically punished, passing a resolution that states «any elected official or potential candidate who does not support marriage as defined between one man and one
woman» won't
get Row C «in any election».
He
voted against equal pay for
women every chance he
got in the Assembly and opposes a
woman's right to choose even in cases of rape or if her life or health are in danger.