Houghton Mifflin's splendidly browsable new reference book,
Women in Scripture, is so exhaustive even its sub - title is lengthy: A Dictionary of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, the Apocryphal / Deuterocanonical Books, and the New Testament.
All Year: The Bible (There are many translations available at biblegateway.com)- Anchor Bible Commentary Series - The Women's Bible Commentary, Edited by Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe - Living Judaism: The Guide to Jewish Belief, Tradition, and Practice by Wayne D. Dosick -
Women in Scripture: A Dictionary of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, the Apocryphal / Deuterocanonical books, and the New Testament, Edited by Carol Meyers, Toni Cravien, and Ross Shepard Kraemer - Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem - Discovering Biblical Equality: Complementarity Without Hierarchy, Edited by Ronald W. Pierce, Rebecca Merrill Groothuis and Gordon D. Fee - Women in the World of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancient Ways of Life by Lynn Cohick - God's Word to Women by Katharine C. Bushnell - Don't Know Much About the Bible: Everything You Need to Know About the Good Book but Never Learned by Kenneth C. Davis - «On The Dignity and Vocation of Women» by Pope John Paul II - The Year of Living Biblically by A.J. Jacobs
Unfortunately, Mollenkott then turns to a discussion of
women in Scripture and says, «So when I see a few passages that seem to come down on certain members of the human race or seem to humiliate or reject them, I am going to be very slow to say that the vast majority of passages (which say the opposite) are wrong.
I have surveyed three feminist approaches to the study of
women in Scripture.
It's refreshing to read through Bessey's spiritual and theological narrative peppered with thoughtful and insightful reflections on interpreting Paul's biblical stance on women, and a beautiful litany of
women in scripture and world history whom God has equipped and used to further God's purposes in the world.
Which story of
a woman in Scripture do you find most liberating and why?
Mary's virgin conception, as it were, is the telos of the conceptions by barren
women in the Scriptures.
Not only did John have doubts and questions, so did every great man or
woman in Scripture.
Not exact matches
Sheryl Sandberg's book on inspiration and advice for
women business leaders may someday be
scripture on how to claim their rightful roles
in the office and the boardroom.
The movement's website features personal stories of
women who are usually the only head coverers
in their churches, as well as arguments from
scripture to support the practice.
How is it that an inspired
woman could write
scripture (e.g., Mary's song), and an inspired
woman could determine for both a king and a high priest whether something is
scripture (e.g., the prophet Huldah
in 2 Kings 22 and 2 Chronicles 34)-- or at least could do these things
in the time of the Old Testament — but an inspired
woman can not now teach about God?
His respect for
women is established
in scripture as is His disrespect for the man - made rules of the Pharisees and their successors
in the Roman curia.
I went to a small town
in the midwest to work for a non-profit thinking it'd be like chicken - soup - for the soul... INSTEAD it was a fundamentalist nightmare... it was NOT just small town mindedness... I could hardly find a church with out people wondering — why is this attractive
woman in her early 30's unwed (or at least divorced with 3 kids) people were cold and unfathomable judgmental and sometimes downright hostile eager to quote
scriptures seemingly un-lead by the Holy Spirit.
If you want to say that two men or two
women is an abomination then you might want to read some more of that
scripture and you would find puting two seeds
in the same hole, working on sundays, wearing cloths with more than one color and lots of other dumb things are mentioned
in a list why do you all foucus on just one part of that list it has lots of abominations that we all do every day
The first enacts
in an imperfect but real way the one - flesh union of a man and a
woman, something
Scripture suggests is fundamental to the human community.
Even patriarchy's deepest plots have not wholly» silenced
women in the biblical tradition, nor does our knowledge of these infamous «proceedings» have to cancel other values of
Scripture for us.
The
scripture passage cited is clear example of how
woman were protected
in a culture where «virginity» was a pre-qualifying event for eligible marriage material.
And so it is ironic that many Christian complementarians / patriarchalists --(who advocate hierarchal gender relationships
in the home and church)-- seem to assume that egalitarians like me --(who support mutuality
in the home and church)-- must have gone off to a secular universities, majored
in women's studies, and come back to impose these «cultural values» onto
Scripture and the Church.
Not only are they
in denominations that will not ordain them, they are
in worship services where
women will never be able to read
scripture or preside at the table or,
in some places, take the offering.
Kirk then examines efforts to argue
in favour of the ordination of
women from
Scripture and Tradition, exposing the sparseness of the proposed evidence and uncovering remarkable deficiencies
in historical scholarship.
Then,
in the context of varying Christological perspectives
in contemporary
Scripture scholarship, he considers, one by one, Jesus» encounters with
women (although oddly Mary, the Mother of Jesus, is omitted from the list).
But Levertov disconcertingly puts us
in sharp contrast with the young
woman of
scripture.
We do know that when Christ did appear, it was
in fact the right time, as
Scripture assures us: «But when the time had fully come, God sent forth his Son, born of a
woman» (Galatians 4:4).
If you enjoy seeing Jesus from a new perspective, gaining insights into
Scripture, or have an interest
in how Jesus interacted with
women during His ministry, I highly recommend this book.
In the post-colonial, post-Atlantic slave trade world, it is crucial that peoples who have historically benefited from the sale and plunder of black women's bodies, justifying those practices with their readings of scripture learn to hear and the scriptures in our voices and through our eye
In the post-colonial, post-Atlantic slave trade world, it is crucial that peoples who have historically benefited from the sale and plunder of black
women's bodies, justifying those practices with their readings of
scripture learn to hear and the
scriptures in our voices and through our eye
in our voices and through our eyes.
Many
women have responded by listening, and with affirmation and encouragement, jus as Sian has done with saying she longs to be critiqued, does not want to have critique held back from her for her being a
woman and was appropriate
in affirming the critique of the «feminist» interpretation of
scripture I made as described.
Second, I believe
Scripture teaches that both men and
women are created
in the image of God (Genesis 1:27), which means both masculinity and femininity are - at some level - part of God's nature.
The teaching that men are to be the «spiritual leaders» of their homes is found nowhere
in Scripture, and yet I — along with far too many young evangelical women — spent hours upon hours fretting over this in college, worrying I'd never find a guy who was more knowledgeable about the Bible than I, who was always more emotionally connected to God than I, who was better at leading in the church than I, and who consistently exhibited more faithfulness and wisdom than I. (In fact, under this paradigm, I came to see many of my gifts as liabilities, impediments to settling down with a good «spiritual leader»
in Scripture, and yet I — along with far too many young evangelical
women — spent hours upon hours fretting over this
in college, worrying I'd never find a guy who was more knowledgeable about the Bible than I, who was always more emotionally connected to God than I, who was better at leading in the church than I, and who consistently exhibited more faithfulness and wisdom than I. (In fact, under this paradigm, I came to see many of my gifts as liabilities, impediments to settling down with a good «spiritual leader»
in college, worrying I'd never find a guy who was more knowledgeable about the Bible than I, who was always more emotionally connected to God than I, who was better at leading
in the church than I, and who consistently exhibited more faithfulness and wisdom than I. (In fact, under this paradigm, I came to see many of my gifts as liabilities, impediments to settling down with a good «spiritual leader»
in the church than I, and who consistently exhibited more faithfulness and wisdom than I. (
In fact, under this paradigm, I came to see many of my gifts as liabilities, impediments to settling down with a good «spiritual leader»
In fact, under this paradigm, I came to see many of my gifts as liabilities, impediments to settling down with a good «spiritual leader»!)
I'll start: I feel most at home
in a church that 1) takes its mission to care for the poor and marginalized seriously, 2) does not make assumptions about its congregation's political positions nor emphasizes political action to begin with, 3) speaks of
Scripture in terms of its ability to «equip us for every good work,» 4) embraces diversity (theologically, ethnically, etc.) and allows
women to assume leadership positions.
159:4.5 «Nathaniel, never permit yourself for one moment to believe the
Scripture records which tell you that the God of love directed your forefathers to go forth
in battle to slay all their enemies — men,
women, and children.
I had finally found a church that emphasized care for the poor, that studied
Scripture, that celebrated an end to nationalism, war, and hate, that provided equal opportunities
women in leadership, that stayed out of politics, and that spoke of God's inclusive love for all people... and it was
in New Jersey... and it was Reformed!
That is, you're using the whole of
Scripture and you have passages that are «proofs,» but you also have passages that are more about what it means to be made
in the image of God and, also, a
woman.
Write a blog post that highlights the feminine images of God found
in Scripture or that celebrates the importance of
women in the Church.
Two
women, two warriors, a song
in Scripture.
(One
woman told me that the only parts of
Scripture she recognizes are those found
in her hymnal, that she didn't know the difference between Psalms and Proverbs, and that she was shocked to learn that some of her favorite liturgy was taken directly from the Bible.)
The goal is to show how
scripture, tradition, reason, and experience all support a posture of equality toward
women, one that favorsmutuality rather than hierarchy,
in the home, Church, and society.
I'm super-excited — mostly because Ruth is one the most inspiring
women of valor found
in Scripture, and I just love highlighting all the ways
in which she broke the rules.
With all due reservations, we can (with Karl Barth) be glad that the Song of Songs is
in the
Scripture not as a cryptogram of theological meaning, but as the love song of man and
woman.
You may have communicated
Scripture on
women's roles
in the church and home, but you have missed the gospel that equips us to bridge the gap between God's good plan and the depraved world
in which we live.
Also, we normally focus on the eternal penalties of sin, because they are the most important, but
Scripture indicates temporal penalties are real and go back to the first sin humans committed: «To the
woman he said, «I will greatly multiply your pain
in childbearing;
in pain you shall bring forth children (Gen. 3:16).
Did King Josiah close his eyes so he would forget she was a
woman as she read and interpreted
Scripture in his presence, explaining, directly and personally, how that
Scripture would affect Israel and its king?
Single, married, divorced, young, old, SAHM, working outside of the home with kids - we should be leveraging the gift of a multigenerational Church and the examples we see
in scripture to see what we are doing aligns with what
women have been doing all through history.
umm...
In Rev 12 the scripture speaks about a sign in the heavens... Rev 12 1And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 2And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivere
In Rev 12 the
scripture speaks about a sign
in the heavens... Rev 12 1And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 2And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivere
in the heavens... Rev 12 1And there appeared a great wonder
in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 2And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivere
in heaven; a
woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 2And she being with child cried, travailing
in birth, and pained to be delivere
in birth, and pained to be delivered.
I do not believe there are some
scriptures in the bible that give any men or
women power to judge any body for is own believe.
Remember back then
women did not have an important significance
in biblcal
scriptures.
As Freud rightly taught, it takes only three parties — a man, a
woman and a child — to create the conditions for enmity
in the world, and the introduction of a fourth, as
scripture tells us, raises Cain.
Women in the Church representative Sally Barnes articulates a view shallow on
scripture and steeped on popular political correctness.
In preparing to teach a course, I looked through a folder of accumulated notes and realized that I first taught the course to an adult class consisting of three women: Jennifer, a widow of about 60 years of age with an eighth - grade schooling, whose primary occupations were keeping a brood of chickens and a goat and watching the soaps on television; Penny, 55, an army wife who treated her retired military husband and her teenage son and daughter as items of furniture in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and placing them in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she live
In preparing to teach a course, I looked through a folder of accumulated notes and realized that I first taught the course to an adult class consisting of three
women: Jennifer, a widow of about 60 years of age with an eighth - grade schooling, whose primary occupations were keeping a brood of chickens and a goat and watching the soaps on television; Penny, 55, an army wife who treated her retired military husband and her teenage son and daughter as items of furniture
in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and placing them in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she live
in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and placing them
in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she live
in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine,
in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she live
in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the
scriptures by which she lived.
Half - way houses, therefore, must be deemed faulty when they approve
women ruling men
in secular affairs (because
Scripture nowhere forbids it and sometimes exemplifies it) but not
in the church or home (because
Scripture requires male leadership
in both), or when they approve
women ruling
in today's church (because Paul's restriction on this seems to be culturally determined) but not
in the family (because biblical teaching on this seems to be transcultural and timeless).
Bachmann would never have been
in the position she is
in right now if it weren't for the
women and men who rejected those
scriptures in the past.