Sentences with phrase «women in the hospital setting»

She has worked with women in hospital settings and at their homes through their labors.

The fact is that neonatal death in otherwise low risk women in the hospital setting is quite rare.

Not exact matches

At Vellore, Ida Scudder (1870 - 1959), daughter of an American missionary doctor; established a medical training centre for women, and later also for men, which, like the hospital at Ludhiana in the north, was to set standards for medical care.

I've heard some women were able to have lovely natural births in a hospital setting.

If a woman feels comfortable in a hospital setting, she will not feel threatened or fear, her labour should hopefully be fine as much as possible and she will hopefully have as great a birth as possible.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) shared just today what I think is their first policy statement specific to homebirth, and as one would anticipate, they concur «with the recent statement of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists affirming that hospitals and birthing centers are the safest settings for birth in the United States while respecting the right of women to make a medically informed decision about delivery» (2013, 1016, abstract).

Though most mothers still give birth in a hospital setting, more and more women are electing to have their babies in birth centers or even in the comfort and privacy of their own homes.

This comes on top of the already - existing divide between the two views of childbirth, with midwives emphasizing the safety of natural births in a familiar, comfortable setting, while the American Medical Association contends women are best off in a hospital, where life - saving technology is nearby if something goes awry.

It is possible to have a water birth in a hospital or home setting; most hospitals have specialist birthing pools but some women prefer to hire a birthing pool and give birth at home.

This new set of NICE guidelines concluded that healthy women with straightforward pregnancies are safer to give birth at home, or in a midwife - led birth centre, than at a hospital with the care of an obstetrician.

In a hospital setting, though, a woman can't follow in the footsteps of her fellow mammal mothers and relocate if she feels like she isn't safIn a hospital setting, though, a woman can't follow in the footsteps of her fellow mammal mothers and relocate if she feels like she isn't safin the footsteps of her fellow mammal mothers and relocate if she feels like she isn't safe.

I found that 87 % of women who planned nonhospital birth agreed with the statement, «Generally speaking, giving birth in a non-hospital setting is at least as safe as giving birth in a hospital for low - risk women» (69 % strongly agreed).

It is a comprehensive online course that teaches women what they need to know about planning and carrying out the birth that they want in all settings - the hospital, birthing center or at home.

I'd like to see an effort to assess what makes home births lead to better outcomes for women, and an attempt to replicate those factors in a hospital setting.

Although unforeseen events and emergencies can occur in any birth setting, some of which can be best handled in a high risk hospital, a low risk healthy woman entering the typical U.S. hospital expecting a normal vaginal birth is subjected to a routine barrage of procedures and interventions that dramatically increase the risk of complications and problems, with potentially longstanding physical and emotional ramifications for both mother and baby.

We welcome the recommendations that all hospitals achieve Baby Friendly Status and that women should have free access 24/7 to lactation consultants within hospital settings and also free access in the community.

The Bradley Method has been the source of confidence for many women having babies in a hospital setting where they have been able to have a natural birth without being pushed into interventions they don't want.

I would love to see a system here similar to Canada, where the midwifery training includes cross-training in home, birth center, and hospital settings, allowing midwives to care for women in all locales.

If homebirth was so safe, hospital birth would never have come into being; anyone who's read novels set before modern obstetrics, anyone who's spent ten minutes reading nonfiction about any historical period or paid attention in history class, knows that pregnancy / birth was a * major * cause of death for young women.

Commenters here repeatedly insinuate that women are selfish for being afraid of abusive providers in a hospital setting.

It is also possible that the unique health care system found in the United States — and particularly the lack of integration across birth settings, combined with elevated rates of obstetric intervention — contributes to intrapartum mortality due to delays in timely transfer related to fear of reprisal and / or because some women with higher - risk pregnancies still choose home birth because there are fewer options that support normal physiologic birth available in their local hospitals.

While the NICE guidelines make it clear that women should be free to choose the birth setting they are most comfortable with, they point out that the risks of over-intervention in the hospital may outweigh the risks of under - intervention at a birth center or at home for the majority of expecting mothers.

I could see from working within the hospital setting, that there was a tremendous need for additional in - home support for breastfeeding women.

In 2012, the home birth rate in Oregon was 2.4 %, which was the highest rate of any state; another 1.6 % of women in Oregon delivered at birth centers.11 Before licensure became mandatory in 2015, Oregon was one of two states in which licensure was not required for the practice of midwifery in out - of - hospital settings.12 Although the 2003 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth distinguishes planned home births from unplanned home births, at the national level there is still no way to disaggregate hospital births that were intended to occur at a hospital and those that had not been intended to occur at a hospitaIn 2012, the home birth rate in Oregon was 2.4 %, which was the highest rate of any state; another 1.6 % of women in Oregon delivered at birth centers.11 Before licensure became mandatory in 2015, Oregon was one of two states in which licensure was not required for the practice of midwifery in out - of - hospital settings.12 Although the 2003 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth distinguishes planned home births from unplanned home births, at the national level there is still no way to disaggregate hospital births that were intended to occur at a hospital and those that had not been intended to occur at a hospitain Oregon was 2.4 %, which was the highest rate of any state; another 1.6 % of women in Oregon delivered at birth centers.11 Before licensure became mandatory in 2015, Oregon was one of two states in which licensure was not required for the practice of midwifery in out - of - hospital settings.12 Although the 2003 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth distinguishes planned home births from unplanned home births, at the national level there is still no way to disaggregate hospital births that were intended to occur at a hospital and those that had not been intended to occur at a hospitain Oregon delivered at birth centers.11 Before licensure became mandatory in 2015, Oregon was one of two states in which licensure was not required for the practice of midwifery in out - of - hospital settings.12 Although the 2003 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth distinguishes planned home births from unplanned home births, at the national level there is still no way to disaggregate hospital births that were intended to occur at a hospital and those that had not been intended to occur at a hospitain 2015, Oregon was one of two states in which licensure was not required for the practice of midwifery in out - of - hospital settings.12 Although the 2003 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth distinguishes planned home births from unplanned home births, at the national level there is still no way to disaggregate hospital births that were intended to occur at a hospital and those that had not been intended to occur at a hospitain which licensure was not required for the practice of midwifery in out - of - hospital settings.12 Although the 2003 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth distinguishes planned home births from unplanned home births, at the national level there is still no way to disaggregate hospital births that were intended to occur at a hospital and those that had not been intended to occur at a hospitain out - of - hospital settings.12 Although the 2003 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth distinguishes planned home births from unplanned home births, at the national level there is still no way to disaggregate hospital births that were intended to occur at a hospital and those that had not been intended to occur at a hospital.

If all low risk women were being cared for by midwives in out of hospital settings, we would see better outcomes, healthier mamas and babies, and women would be able to tell their birth story with confidence that they had control.

Studies in Australia, 13 Canada, 14 and the United States15 16 have concluded that in some settings midwife managed home birth can be associated with as low a perinatal mortality as hospital birth for low risk women, reviving the debate over the need to allow women genuine choice.17 18

«Until a woman's cervix is dilated to 3 or 4 centimeters, she usually doesn't need to be in the hospital setting,» says Elliott Main, M.D., medical director of the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative.

«Such emergencies would always require the transfer of women by ambulance to the hospital as extra medical support is only present in hospital settings and would not be available to them when they deliver at home.»

If you don't have any other options read women giving birth in a hospital for detailed information on how to set yourself up for success.

Research also suggests that women who use hospital - based birthing centers are more likely to have a normal vaginal birth and more likely to be breast - feeding six to eight weeks after delivery than those who give birth in a typical hospital setting, said Ellen Hodnett, a professor of nursing at the University of Toronto and a review author for the Cochrane Collaboration Pregnancy and Childbirth Group.

Hypoglycemia, Going Home / Discharge, Supplementation, Mastitis, Peripartum BF Management, Cosleeping and Breastfeeding, Model Hospital Policy, Human Milk Storage, Galactogogues, Breastfeeding the Late Pre-term Infant, Analgesia and Anesthesia for the Breastfeeding Mother, Breastfeeding the Hypotonic Infant, Guidelines for Breastfeeding Infants with Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, or Cleft Lip and Palate, Use of Antidepressants in Nursing Mothers, Breastfeeding Promotion in the Prenatal Setting, Engorgement, Breastfeeding and the Drug - Dependant Woman, Jaundice, Non-Pharmacologic Management of Procedure - Related Pain in the Breastfeeding Infant, Allergic Proctocolitis in the Exclusively Breastfed Infant, Preprocedural Fasting for the Breastfed Infant

Natural birth does not have to be confined to your home, and many women do have a birth without any interventions in a hospital setting without chants going on and incense burning in the background.

IBCLCs can be found in a wide variety of settings including private practice, working with home birth midwives, hospitals and birth centers, pediatric and obstetric offices, public health clinics such as the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program as well as many other settings.

However, in the models of care that they examined all women gave birth in the hospital setting.

A woman has the right to choose the birth she wants, but she needs to make sure that she knows what she can and can't do in a hospital setting.

Today, Anne has extensive training and clinical experience in women's health and maternity care, in both in - hospital and out - of - hospital settings, including water birth.

Above all a woman should never be forced to give birth in either a hospital or home setting if she is not comfortable.

Although I think homebirth takes on a set of risks a hospital is in many cases equipped to handle in a time frame that provides the best chance for life, I don't deny a woman's right to choose either for her family.

Midwives are trained in listening to the woman and taking her health as well as infants» health into consideration and getting mom and babe to hospital if emergency arises which she is unable to perform miracles for in a home setting.

There are plenty of women who plan to give birth in the top rated hospital, with this or that doctor, with this or that medication and are so set on it until they end up giving birth in their car!

I trained in a hospital setting and I firmly believe that certified nurse midwives have our place and are very useful in the healthcare setting, BUT I also know that many women are not well informed about the bitrth process and the dangers involved.

All sorts of hilarious errors — using one type of data (ICD10 code data from «white healthy women» and essentially comparing the best possible data from one set of hospital data related to low - risk births to the worst possible single set of data related to high - risk at - home births)-- if you use the writer's same data source for hospital births but include all comers in 2007 - 2010 (not just low - risk healthy white women), the infant death rate is actually 6.14 per 1000, which is «300 % higher death rate than at - home births!»

I am a midwife who has worked part time in a hospital setting caring for women, families and babies.

Women all over New York State are unable to attain the excellent care of midwives in hospitals, birthing centers and in the home setting.

TRUTH: While midwifery by its nature is low intervention, the same pain management options exist for all women who deliver their babies in a hospital setting, regardless if they choose a doctor or midwife.

Her understanding and experience of birth has been gained over almost forty years of birth work; supporting birthing women, their partners and families at over one thousand births in home and hospital settings.

The findings can therefore be generalised to any setting where women's pregnancy and delivery are managed in a hospital setting.

But in a hospital setting, it is far easier to manage a floor of laboring woman who are attached to monitors, than women bouncing through the hall on yoga balls, leaking amniotic fluid everywhere and high - fiving each other (maybe).

Five studies offered the intervention in the context of Baby Friendly accreditation of the hospital, and are unlikely to be generalisable to settings where this standard of care is not available to all women.

Thus, midwife - led continuity models of care aim to provide care in either community or hospital settings, normally to healthy women with uncomplicated or «low - risk» pregnancies.