Sentences with phrase «women or men then»

If you want to achieve self confidence with women or men then it is well worth setting aside a little time to try the simple technique outlined in the article below.

If you are searching for Australian single women or men then you could do a lot worse than using the search panel above from PenPalsPlanet.com.

But before you go to the article let me remind you that if you are here for dating mature women or men then please take a serious look at our recommended dating service for mature singles, PenPalsPlanet.com.

If your are married woman or man then have a discreet affair as many dating sites offer discreet personals for casual sex or one night stands.

Not exact matches

If you give a woman — or a man, for that matter — without his or her knowledge a drug, and then have sex with that person without consent, that's rape.

To investigate the impact of not looking our best on our behavior, Stanford professor Margaret Neale and PhD student Peter Belmi asked a group of both women and men to write about a time they felt either attractive or unattractive and then quizzed them on their attitudes to inequality and hierarchy.

Instead, it requires coming to terms with the fact that masculinity trains men to have great difficulty recognizing women — or, indeed, anyone that presents as feminine — as persons, as agents, as authoritative and worthy of respect, and then making an effort to see and treat them that way.

Her advice is the same for any parent, woman or man, CEO or temp worker: get help where you can, share the load, and then «Let go of the guilt, tell your kids you love them, and go order pizza.»

If your marketing team is debating whether your persona is a man or a woman, or if you are bogged down finding just the right stock image of your persona, then you're focusing on the wrong things.

For if a man or a woman's body — or his or her status as a married person, or his capacity to be a father or hers to be a mother — doesn't matter for his or her sex life, why, then, should anyone imagine that the body of the Son of God matters, whether it is in a manger, on a cross, risen, or fully and really present under the signs of bread and wine?

Are you a fashionable man or woman who is also completely overwhelmed by the most impossibly simple task of modern life: putting on your pants and then your shoes?

«Dear Society, If you think a woman in a tan vinyl bra and underwear, grabbing her crotch and grinding up on a dance partner is raunchy, trashy, and offensive but you don't think her dance partner is raunchy, trashy, or offensive as he sings a song about «blurred» lines of consent and propagating rape culture, then you may want to reevaluate your acceptance of double standards and your belief in stereotypes about how men vs. women «should» and are «allowed» to behave.

The path to true financial security for a woman in the U.S. quite often entails getting breast implants and selling herself to the man with a 6 - series bmw or s - class benz, then divorcing him and taking his money.

Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a talking snake if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.

They influence our Government at ALL levels who in turn send the innocnet Men and Women who wear the uniform into harms way thus coming back in body bags, mental / physical ailments then having our OWN Government via the V.A. tell these brave souls «Sorry I can't help you» or nickel and dime their life long injuries.

New covenant or not, since you believe we are talking about the same god, then he most definitely ordered entire tribes — men, women and children — killed.

If you want to say that two men or two women is an abomination then you might want to read some more of that scripture and you would find puting two seeds in the same hole, working on sundays, wearing cloths with more than one color and lots of other dumb things are mentioned in a list why do you all foucus on just one part of that list it has lots of abominations that we all do every day

After all, when men and women get married then divorced and remarry, don't the new spouses hate when their husband or wife wishes to have relations with their first love?

If that man or woman is a true leader, and kind, and honest, and humble, then we will be all AOK, no matter what system we follow.

Gary: I think I agree with your point that «if 1 man and 1 woman was a normal teaching of Paul's» for all believers, then it follows that the text either means «this is only for the elders and higher positions» OR that the text was referring to some other situation, such as marrying a divorced woman.

If you believe in evolution, then there was no garden nor a first man or women that disobeyed God, (no original sin).

(3) Then, adding your note that Paul said that in Christ there is not man or woman to your symbol I got this one:

Now if that means that I have to say only women should stay home or that a man is the only one allowed to work, then cast that label aside and find something else to call me.

We who proclaim Christ ought to have enough faith that our Lord is what we claim him to be, to permit such men and women to have, if not full then some limited, participation in Christian life in the community of faith; for we are confident, or we should be confident if we really believe what we say about Jesus, that such fellowship with him in the company of his people will lead them more and more deeply into the true significance of his person.

If the ideal can not be lived out then I would hope that neither my daughters nor any other young man or woman would engage in premarital sexual relations except as the result of the most mature act of decision - making.

The hardest thing to accept as a Christian is that being a Christian is like climbing a slippery pole, you are always back sliding... We are all hypocrites, as we are an imperfect man or woman severing a perfect God... I find myself humbled to knowing that there are over 100 sins in the bible way to many to say, and not one is greater then another....

a0 Men wantading to force a woman to carry a child against her will.a0 Then you get this guy, who is so, totally, oblivadiadous that he denies comadmitadting aduladtry.a0 Clinadton aside, I ama0 sure Hillary dealt with him.a0 How could he be so vain or naefve to think that this wouldn't come out?a0 Shame on him, subadjectading his wife and famadily to thisa0 «crap».

After all, if marriage requires actions or relations unique to male — female unions, then to say that marriage is between a man and a woman is akin to a tautology, and we could perhaps regard the question of how we approach same - sex relationships as an altogether different issue.

If a man wants to have multiple wives or if a woman wants to have multiple husbands (Polyandry), then they should be able to do so as our country is founded upon the principles of freedom.

But if God is — that is, if the cosmic Love is inescapably there and not simply a speculation or wish on the part of us men and women and if God is also the divine, worshipful, and unsurpassable One who is concerned with and acts for his world in all its richness and variety, then surely the significant thing for us is to focus our attention upon that One.

Certainly individuals are different than nation states (by this I mean that as individuals our choices are clearer - not that we can not properly discern whether a particular war is or is not necessary - but even then its much much tougher) and matters of war and peace are very much filled with variables men and women as individuals would have an a very difficult task of unwinding to find some acceptable scenario.

It takes a lot of courage for me to speak out like this and if all this does is give hope to one person so they man or woman would be enabeld to got help for healing and / or someone who is mistreating think twice about what they are doing then I will have provided a service.

I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet» and then they silence women in the church... in a well - meaning way.

There simply were not enough baby boys born during the war years to provide husbands for the bumper crop of girls born in 1947,» 48, and ’49 (given the then - custom for women to marry men a year or two older than themselves).

The most decisive and interesting condition, as reported, consisted in the principle that if the woman did not affirm the man's self - image then no courtship ensued or was possible.

So you are acknowledging, then, that women never sit on a disciplinary council, whether it is convened to consider a man's or a woman's misdeeds, right?

but the woman or our society keep the war against Rome going for 1000 years then another 1000 when England took over the assault, their valiant struggle did not end until Christendom put are woman to the subservient side of the coin, and the dark ages followed, my point is your right men and woman can not do the same things men destroy, women create.

I would ask a homeless person if they want something to eat and if they say no then no i would not give to a homeless man or woman, in other words they would not need the money.

I think most of the Americans are in lost... as most of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave of material things...

When I met sometimes with merry companions, and my heart was ready to sink, I would labor to put on as cheerful a countenance as possible, that they might not distrust anything, and sometimes would begin some discourse with young men or young women on purpose, or propose a merry song, lest the distress of my soul would be discovered, or mistrusted, when at the same time I would then rather have been in a wilderness in exile, than with them or any of their pleasures or enjoyments.

Is it any wonder, then, that he expected some women in Corinth to prophesy, but challenged others to «remain silent,» or that he advised the women at Ephesus not to seize authority over men but to «learn in quietness and full submission»?

A picture of him with his arms around someone other then his wife (man or woman)?

O Mankind wake up... educate urself to the truth and get out of the darkness... and fear ur Lord who created you from one soul and He created his wife from him and then men and women from them... fear your Lord that you will be meeting Him after this short life... you are here for a test of «Free Will» whether you fear the Lord who created you or fear your delusion / imaginations... and you are heading towards your Creator...

For a peasant woman's child in occupied territory in an out - of - the - way corner of the Roman Empire to have become the man he did, attracting what looked like flash - in - the - pan attention during his brief years of ministry, unknown to most of his contemporaries and viewed as an upstart, a wonder - worker, or a fanatic by most of those who knew about him, dying a felon's death deserted by most of his close and trusted friends with the incredible rumor then circulated that he had risen again — what chance had he of any lasting fame?

Now I stand firm on this conviction that yes... an homosexual man or women can come to faith and be saved by Jesus Christ and have their sins forgiven through the blood of Jesus Christ but through the sanctification of the Holy Spirit they would not carry on committing the act of homosexuality because they would be «convicted» — now where there is no conviction of sin then where is the fruit of the Holy Spirit in that man or women?

He would then rise from the dead, defeating death, and ascend into heaven, and if a man or woman will repent, and put their trust in the redeeming work of Christ, God will demonstrate His loving - kindness, grace, and mercy towards them by forgiving all of their sins and granting them everlasting life.

I lean towards the third view... but I admit it is the most difficult of the three views... Christ's priorities appear to be «love in motion» flowing in almost unpredictable directions as dictated by the greatest need: — He heals a slave rather than rebukes slavery; — He heals a man at a pool, then leads the man to belief, then says «cease from sinning»; — He heals many others and says «go and sin no more» to but a few; — He shares money with the poor but establishes no long - term aid; — He touches lepers; He converses with seeking Pharisees; He debates with other Pharisees; He lives with Samaritan outcasts for two days; — He acknowledges the five «marriages» of the Samaritan woman as «marriages»... and then remarks about her current co-habitation... but then moves to higher priorities; — He seems so very focused on internal holiness and not on external holiness; — He violates the Sabbath; He says He is Lord of the Sabbath; He even says that the Sabbath was created to assist man, rather than man created to serve the Sabbath... thus turning the entire concept of the Law into one of assistance rather than being chained to obedience; — He insists on impartiality in the way we bless others, even if we call them «evil» or «good».

It's no ones fault, but mine, but somehow I always felt offended as a woman that any man would have the gall or nerve (gasp) to be more attracted to an ugly hairy man then a round, beautiful woman.

All I see here is a guilty man ashamed of that which he should not be ashamed of and a woman lacking in confidence basing her definition of their relationship on the physical rather then the emotional (or in this case the spiritual).

If we lay aside our opinions, biases, views, mindsets... etc and honestly and objectively look at what the Bible says and teaches then we can only conclude that women are not to be pastors, preachers, or teachers over men.