Sentences with phrase «word analysis of»

Not exact matches

Not an in - depth analysis of the routes Funchess ran, about adjustments he made, about the game plan Panther coaches devised, but still: Positive words about players and coaches, giving credit where credit is due.

In other words, they require an analysis of their market before the actual work begins.

Michael Toth, a data scientist at fintech company Orchard, decided to do a sentiment analysis of the letters, comparing the number of negative words such as «loss,» «difficult,» «bad,» and «risk» with the number of positive words, such as «gains,» «top,» «excellent,» and «advantage.»

This conclusion comes care of Global Language Monitor (GLM), an Austin, Texas - based language analysis firm, which scoured blogs, Twitter, Facebook and 250,000 global news outlets to determine the year's most popular words.

Then, the artificial intelligence platform digests the information and predicts outcomes based on its analysis of the data, such as bill sponsors, committees, and the actual wording of the legislation.

Copywriter Salaries Copywriting Examples Start Learning Copy Now Copywriting Tools Consulting As A Side Job How To Become A Copywriter Make a Copywriting Portfolio Copywriting Books and Courses Freelance Writing for Beginners Swipe File Copywriting Guides: The State of Copywriting 2018 Direct Mail Marketing Guide One Pager Examples Sell Me This Pen Leading Questions Why Use Images vs Text How To Write A Brochure Headlines That Sell Using Ear Plugs To Write Writing Guides Three Tiered Pricing Different Pricing Examples How To Make A PDF Billboard Advertising Guide Write an AirBnB Description How to Write a SWOT Analysis Job Interview Questions How to Write a Memo How to Write a Testimonial Make Money Licensing Music How to Create a Tagline Work From Home Successfully LinkedIn Recommendations Choosing The Right Photos How to Start A Conversation How to Sell Art Online How To Become A Life Coach Best Business Podcasts Tone of Voice in Copywriting Workplace Communication Skills Power & Trigger Words For Sales Content Marketing Guides: Writing Advertorials Easiest Font to Read How To Write A Follow Up Email Cold Email Like A Boss S&P 500 Company Slogan Effective Sales Letters How to Write a Newsletter How to Write an About Page How to Get Your Posts Seen Making A Content Mill Real Estate Flyers Get First Photography Job Email Open Rate Examples Content Writing vs Copywriting Become A Famous YouTuber Story Arcs for Content Marketing Copywriter Mentality: Writers Block Copywriting Quotes Psychology of Marketing Taking a Workcation to Think Health / Wealth / Love Test How to Interview Someone Get a Job or Start a Business?

November 16, 2017, Austin, Texas — Truth has been named the 2017 Word of the Year for Global English (#WOTY2017) by the Global Language Monitor, in its eighteenth annual global analysis.

In other words, spend time understanding the company's ability to survive until the eventual turnaround and what the downside (margin of safety) is if your analysis proves wrong.

With strict capital controls and a state - controlled stock exchange that is volatile and risky, the tangible reassurance of evergreen property has made it a «fungible commodity,» in the words of Anne Stevenson - Yang, co-founder of Beijing - based equities analysis firm J Capital Research.

In an attempt to clear some of the fog of campaign rhetoric on how economists actually use the R word, and what it really signifies, I called Craig Alexander, the C. D. Howe Institute's vice president, economic analysis.

This is precisely why he argued that judges often need, through careful historical analysis, to consult the original meaning of the words in the legal text.

Offred also creates her own subversive counter-texts and continually practices the mental acts of poetic synthesis and analysis, remaking distinctions that the State elides and reviving the language for which she hungers in this famine of the Word.

Aware and concerned, the progressive church moves beyond itself in word and deed, but it tends to stop, short of an analysis - of and actions - against the strictures of injustice, even while it promotes programs to alleviate misery.

So, not only does his analysis seems to be horridbly lacking, but you have further miscontrued what he said as you do not understanding the meaning of even the English words in question.

Bu tthe effort of trying to live a good christian life got to much ad i was disollutioned.Spent ten years as a backslidden barely believing christian and then in recent years as a transformed renewed Christian and i finally got it.It is all about a relationship with Jesus Christ and working in submission to the holy spirit he is the one that inspires his word he brings it to life.If you want to understand the word we must apply it to our lives then it becomes part of us thats the difference between knowledge and understanding not just knowing the word but living the word.The bible is a book useful for living not just a theoretical analysis or a history book.Jesus is the living word its through him that he opens his word to us without the holy spirit in us the carnal mind can not comprehend Gods word it a mystery.It was designed that way so only those who are truly seeking God shall find him.brentnz

his analysis of sundry maxims and «verbal museums» like Bartlett's supports the claim that quoting is a quintessentially human proclivity: «Can one even think without the words of others?»

Trible's careful attention to the repetition of the word «pity» has produced this reading, and certainly the many pages of verbal and structural analysis show this to be her strength.

The point I wanted to make is that God invites His people to study His Word in depth, to use the minds that He gave us and renewed, to gradually discover the deep levels of His progressive revelation, and to compare the internal consistency of His message to claims from other religions which invariably crumble upon thoughtful analysis.

In any case, as someone else pointed out, this is just using a text recognition analysis for certain words; noticeably missing is the contents / context of those tweets.

This was not, as we shall see on further analysis of the image, a naive biblicism that equated God's Word with the literal words of the Bible.

While I admit that I can not read those languages, I have read what the original verses said along with critical analysis of the words in context of the timeframe that they were written in.

«With the help of a text analysis program, the researchers found that Christians tweet with higher frequency words reflecting positive emotions, social relationships»

Fourth, as used in most evangelical discussion, the term is a philosophical judgment controlled by categories alien to Scripture; it is a slogan based on «how God ought to have inspired the Word» which has been substituted for careful patient analysis of what the Bible does teach about itself.

Democrats are liberals who, in a correct analysis of their political situation, assiduously avoid using the word that most commonly describes them.

I understand my own analysis of what is wrong with the word to be in fundamental agreement with Paul.

Van Buren uses the services of linguistic analysis to repudiate any content - meaning for the word «God.»

Let us not say that it shows a lack of analysis or the influence of Babylonian or other groups» thinking, that theologians and philosophers have understood the nature of God much better, so that we should drop the idea of a «Word» with reference to God.

Detailed comparative analysis of individual sections or pericopae in the synoptic gospels has confirmed the hypothesis that during the lengthy period before the writing of our earliest gospel individual sayings and incidents in Jesus» ministry were — note the verb — used: as they were worked over and adapted, their context and wording may have been altered beyond recall.

The objection, from the standpoint of language analysis, is that they have not paid adequate attention to the normal use and meaning of words.

The overall suspicion, in other words, is that somehow Christian faith has lost its «transcendent» element, that It has been «reduced» to «horizontalism» at the expense of «verticalism,» that it has become nothing more than «ethics» (and left - wing ethics at that), that «social analysis» has replaced theology, that revolution has replaced revelation — and that Karl Marx is the source of all the difficulty.

Another advantage of this terminological clarity emerges in the analysis of the famous Roman Catholic apologist Monsignor Ron ald Knox, who pointed out in his sermon «The Cross «Word of Creation» (published in his 1942 collection In Soft Garments) that order must not be confused with design.

Although it's written by a researcher who focuses his analysis upon American believers and churches, and although he sometimes gets a little too «visionary» and formulaic for my taste, you might find a couple of nuggets of truth in his words.

You can't say Reihan offers sound analysis, because nine times out of ten he offers no analysis at all beyond calling a topic «interesting» — or his favorite word, «fascinating» — and saying you should read more about it.

The book does not, perhaps, offer the most daring of speculative analyses nor is it the last word in Trinitarian theology, but it is full of good, solid Catholic doctrine.

Theologians influenced by positivism, whose adherents saw reality as strictly that which can be experienced through the senses and knowledge as that which can be obtained through a narrow definition of the scientific method, and linguistic analysis, which purported that the only proper function of philosophy is the study of the usage of words and sentences, also treated science and religion as separate realms, distinct «language games,» each with its own set of rules.

There is also delicate analysis of how God works through decisions of humans whether or not they are responsive to God's word through the prophet.

His position is that intensive analysis of all the fundamental categories of language discloses either unavoidable paradoxes or the reality of God as an indispensable aspect of the categories» meanings.12 In his own words, «Language is bound to generate paradox if one attempts to purify it of all theistic implications; standard language is essentially theistic.

We are at present calling attention to the return by certain philosophers to primitive understandings of the spoken word in order to revive language smothered under the small heading of verificational analysis.

If one does a comparative analysis of various Bible translations, of the same exact scripture, they will often find the word hell or sheol, hades, pit, or grave.

Hopefully this technical analysis will illuminate Whitehead's lyrical words towards the end of Process and Reality:

Perhaps our discussion of the sickness of words should conclude by hesitantly entertaining the possibility that the reason is more profound, transcending all our analyses.

The Word of God, far from being solely the object of a preacher's analysis, is primarily the subject of revelation.

From these view - points, a word can no longer be in the real sense an «event» for the hearer; for by means of correct analysis he can have in view beforehand all the possibilities of what may be said to him.

In the final analysis, the substance of the revelatory word of promise is the gift of God's own self to the world.

The divine Word may address one reader as he follows Paul's analysis of the gospel in Romans 1 - 8, and yet another is left cold by the involved argument.

In other words, Ogden's analysis of various descriptions of experience is informed by two distinctions, both of which apply to the noetic pole of experience: a twofold distinction between nonsensuous and sensory modes of experience and a threefold distinction of what Whitehead calls «the feeling of the ego, the others, the totality,» that is, of self, other, and whole (PP 84).8 This comprehensive hermeneutical grid then permits an explanation of what he claims is a «sense of ourselves and others as of transcendent worth,» as precisely an «awareness of ourselves and the world as of worth to God» (PP 86f) Y Ogden notes that such an evidently theistic explanation is not open to empirical or experiential confirmation on either of the two more restrictive descriptions which, as he observes, must either «refer the word God» to some merely creaturely reality or process of interaction, or else., must deny it all reference whatever by construing its meaning as wholly noncognitive,» if they seek experiential illustration for such a sense at all (PP 80) 10

In 2015, Francis wished his closest collaborators a merry Christmas with a lengthy, gloomy rundown of «curial antibiotics,» via an acrostic analysis of the Latin word misericordia.

While a theological analysis of other candidates would suggest many equally troubling assumptions of their evangelical followers, no candidate is more identified with the word evangelical as is Trump.

Consider the wording of the first text Brueggemann puts forth in support of his analysis, a portion of the Song of Moses:

One frequent criticism of the new hermeneutic's «word - event» concept is that it is empty and contentless, something like the «blik» of language analysis.