We've been told they are the last
word on climate matters, that they represent the consensus of the world's science community — and that they are based on rigorous, peer - reviewed research.
Not exact matches
Update, June 19, 10:30 p.m. Joe Romm has written a long post
on Climate Progress
on the Orwellian aspects of a «good» Anthropocene — «
Words Matter When Talking Global Warming: The «Good Anthropocene» Debate» — and Hamilton has a long essay in Scientific American warning that «The New Environmentalism Will Lead Us to Disaster.
These
words signal entry into libertarian fantasyland — nothing to do with
climate, not
on topic, nothing to do with the practical politics of the
matter (libertarians poll less than 1 % in national elections.)
In other
words,
climate scientists can (and do) change their opinions
on man - made global warming (or any other scientific issue, for that
matter).