These columns and editorials came on the heels of a strongly
worded amicus brief filed by 15 state attorneys general, including Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman, in support of the energy industry last week.
As promised, the New York Public Interest Research Group has submitted an
amicus (friend of the court)
brief in support of the lawsuit that challenges the
wording of the ballot proposal on casino expansion that voters will be asked to decide on Election Day next month.
The old saying goes that a picture is worth 1000
words, so if your
amicus brief was limited to five pages at roughly 250
words a page you would have 1250
words to state your position (after previously submitting a 25 page
brief -6250
words).
For example, Feldman analyzed the quality of Supreme Court merits briefs using a composite of features such as passivity, wordiness, sentence length, and tone.63 He found that
brief readability was positively associated with the percentage of
brief language adopted in the opinion and that the association was highly significant.64 Similarly, Collins et al. analyzed the «cognitive clarity» and plain language of Supreme Court
amicus briefs.65 They measured cognitive clarity using the dictionary - based Linguistic Inquiry and
Word Count program (LIWC), which relied on an index of categories that relate to cognitive clarity such as «causation, insight, discrepancy, inhibition, tentativeness, certainty, exclusiveness, inclusiveness, negations, and the percentage of
words containing six or more letters.»