If your not making a prediction however then «likely» or any or
wording is meaningless because your not putting putting your reputation up for that argument.
You can repeat words your pastor told you over and over again, but
your words are meaningless, they have no soul, no content.
If you don't do the deeds,
the words are meaningless.
Friend you need the guidance of the Holy Spirit to lead you into all truths, otherwise you're like a vehicle without fuel - you have no power to get you anywhere i.e.
your words are meaningless.
Words are just that, words, unless you can demonstrate the veracity of
the words they are meaningless.
For example, the assertion that words have their meanings only in their relations with other
words is itself meaningless if there is no claim to correspond with actual discourse.
That includes words, but
the words are meaningless to most people if only words come their way and no love, no caring, no relationship.
(Of course, all good - for - you foods in moderation... [I know,
that word is meaningless.]-RRB-
He has a lot of trouble with an unforgiving cop (Samuel L. Jackson), and with a district attorney (Stanley Tucci), whose
word is meaningless.
The ignorance here are astounding Please explain your claim with links to the facts as
your word are meaningless!
Considering this, I question the purpose of specifying «except in a prosecution for perjury or for giving of contradictory evidence» in section 51 if Staranchuk affirmed that similar
words were meaningless in section 13 of the Charter in cases involving deceit (Staranchuk at para 5).
Demonstrating your amazing abilities and quantifying your accomplishments with bold action
words are meaningless if they are convoluted in a format that is unreadable.
The words themselves are meaningless unless they are backed up with facts.
Not exact matches
The
word «engagement» has
been overused to the point that it
's a
meaningless filler
word.
Don't get bogged down with fluff and buzz
words that
are vague and
meaningless.
Without failure, success
is a
meaningless 7 - letter
word.
He compared it to looking at the page of a book, which
is meaningless when taken in as a whole and instead needs to
be looked at
word by
word.
all your many
words about seeing bacteria change and so on
is meaningless.
See, anything can
be «love» — so much so, the
word becomes
meaningless.
Of course, if you want to call whatever the explanation for the universe happens to
be «god» then the
word becomes
meaningless and everyone believes in god by definition.
If we try to define belief the way you propose then absolutely everything, true or false,
is a belief and you end up with the
word belief becoming
meaningless.»
Is it possible that the message of comfort for those devastated by the faltering world economy will
be nothing more than trite and
meaningless words if not accompanied by a biblical response where we, the church, become the Good News, the economic expression of God in flesh?
Written
words, without seeing my eyes, or
being in my physical presence, must express some semblance of feelings behind it, otherwise the
words, no matter how technically correct,
are meaningless.
Lots of
meaningless words intended to maintain the status quo and avoid the hard questions, such as «where
's the evidence for your delusions?»
At a purely physical level these
words are nothing more than a collection of
meaningless particles of graphite.
The idea of complete specificity of a future individual event
is, as Charles Hartshorne observed, a
meaningless assemblage of
words.
If they can not provide verifiable evidence for the existence of God, or any god, their
words are completely and entirely
meaningless.
God himself speaks harshly of
meaningless religious practices in his
word, so your comment «your religion...»
is also
meaningless.
To simply say that the Bible
is the
word of God, without explaining that,
is meaningless rhetoric.
Those
words are just the
meaningless blathering of a deluded individual.
In other
words his atheism
was meaningless.
As a consequence a generation has arisen in which sin
is an almost
meaningless word.
To talk in that fashion
is not to speak of a kind of
meaningless re-enactment of what went on in the creation; it
is to speak of a vital, living, and ongoing movement, where God knows and experiences (if that
word is, as I believe, appropriate to the divine life) that which has taken place, but knows it and experiences it with a continuing freshness and delight — and, if what has taken place has
been evil, with a continuing tinge of sadness and regret — such as must
be proper to the chief creative and chief receptive agency who
is worshiped and served by God's human children.
Without relationship theology
is meaningless, empty
words (the condition of much religion).
All the sky fairy and its son do
is mouth empty
meaningless words, why don't they DO SOMETHING.
To the thousands who
were reached and electrified by his
words it meant the difference between the suffering of a
meaningless fate and the liberating insight into the ultimate triumph of Jewish spirit which knows no defeat....
They can't understand that their
words are just
meaningless drivel.
The
words used in traditional forms have become
meaningless and have no performative value, or, if they have, it
is open to question whether the evidence for their effectiveness can
be found in church attendance or some kind of social action.
Please don't make that
word meaningless by having it apply to something for which there
is zero proof.
And that
is much more useful than David simply providing a new definition for two reasons: he
's seeking not necessarily to redefine, but to challenge already existing inconsistencies between our use of the
words and how people actually function, AND because such terms
are given their meaning collectively so redefining it alone would
be meaningless because it wouldn't draw on people
's real experience with their beliefs and views of the labels.
is entirely
meaningless — for I have no idea how you define those
words.
«I
am with you for all time» - the
words of Christ in Mt 28:20 can always
be rendered as
meaningless and so ineffective in such a view of reality.
Use of the
word «Catholic» before the schism
is kind of
meaningless.
As Manfred Mezger has pointed out, an opera may
be right and valid without an audience, but a service of the
Word is a call, and a call
is meaningless without a hearer.
Equally
meaningless is a discussion of
Word of God fixed at one pole, the Bible, apart from the other, the Church.
This excuse
is meaningless as the godsters say the bible
is the
WORD OF THEIR GOD.
Such
words must seem to many to
be pious and
meaningless platitudes, mere gestures of respect to the past and bare of that realism which the present moment demands.
Word, whether it be of God or of man, is properly understood as communication, and it is rather meaningless to discuss word in terms of one per
Word, whether it
be of God or of man,
is properly understood as communication, and it
is rather
meaningless to discuss
word in terms of one per
word in terms of one person.
His posts
are riddled with spelling and capitalization errors which, along with incorrect
word usage, render them essentially
meaningless.
We should all
be grateful to live in a country where free speech
is protected — whether it
's Dan Cathy
's comments on gay marriage or a protestor
's homemade sign — and we must
be wary of victimizing ourselves over something like this lest we render the
word «persecution»
meaningless.