There are many ways to stay fit, but the best way is to balance the energy consumed to the energy utilized (in other
words calories eaten should be equal to the calories burned).
Not exact matches
ok just a
word of advice to anyone truly
calorie counting... firstly you shouldn't be... you just need to
eat a balance and everything will balance for you... restricting is never good....
«The
word «detox» has a negative connotation, but it's really OK to do some
calorie control for a day or a couple of days after a period of heavy
eating,» advises De Fazio.
In other
words,
eating more
calories than you need and having chronically high levels of insulin in the bloodstream will keep the body in «fat storage mode», while feeding your body with less
calories than it normally burns will make it turn to its stored fat as an energy source.
In other
words: Yeah, 10,000 steps is great, but if you follow up those 10,000 steps by buying a 500 -
calorie hamburger — and, more generally, spend the rest of your day
eating junk — you can still gain weight and face all sorts of unpleasant negative health outcomes.
In other
words,
eating itself costs
calories — every process from chewing and swallowing to the production of enzymes and muscular contractions in the stomach costs energy.
You see, «diets» do get one thing right: You DO need a «
calorie deficit» in order to burn fat... in other
words, you still need to use up more
calories than you
eat.
When I hear the
words Whole - food / Plant - based or WFPB for short, I think of an
eating pattern that is strongly centered around whole (or at most very minimally processed) plant foods and that minimizes animal food and highly refined plant foods to at most occasional feature of the diet constituting a few percent (10 % at most, IMHO) of
calories.
In other
words, the bean group was asked to
eat more food and the cutting
calories group was asked to
eat less food.
In other
words, let's say you're
eating 800
calories a day in just drinking coke.
In other
words, in general, you would want to
eat more foods that are more
calorie dense.
In other
words, I
eat healthfully, but don't terribly restrict
calorie intake that much.
As a general guide I list below the various names of
eating styles without using the «D»
word, using an approximate 2,100 -
calorie per - day
eating plan as an example.
The findings indicate that daily energy expenditure may be an «evolved physiological trait largely independent of cultural differences;» in other
words,
eating more than the number of
calories most human bodies are «wired» for could mean you'll gain weight — even if you're exercising religiously
It all has to do with your intake and your output, in other
words it is all about the
calories that you
eat.
Intuitive
eating isn't a diet in the true sense of the
word; it doesn't require restricting your
calories or food.
In other
words, if one is
eating a
calorie - restricted diet, but not feeling ravenous or deprived, and continuously gaining fat or unable to lose fat, is this likely to be a leptin problem?
We have no way to verify how many
calories these people are
eating or burning before and after they lost weight, so we have to take their
word for it.
In other
words, if you
eat 100
calories of protein, your body burns 25 % of those
calories just digesting the protein.
In other
words, if you
eat the same volume of food, you will consume much less
calories.
Plus, as you consider quality nutrition rather than quantity of
calories, you will be
eating real, whole, life - giving foods that keep your body healthy and in balance (in other
words, at an appropriate weight).
In other
words, in some people they
eat calories and they get warm, other people they
eat the same amount of
calories, they don't get warm, they store fat.
In other
words, working out before breakfast directly combated the two most detrimental effects of
eating a high - fat, high -
calorie diet.
In other
words, if you
eat enough protein, you will feel less hungry and
eat fewer
calories.
Used in conjunction with the other
eating guidelines, obtaining 30 to 40 % of your
calories from natural sources of proteins will speed up your metabolic rate, in other
words, «burn» more
calories.
In other
words, counting
calories often creates a disconnect between your hunger levels and how much you
eat.
In other
words, even though they
ate the same total volume of food, they consumed fewer
calories.
The authors dared to hypothesize that modest, regular chocolate consumption might be
calorie - neutral — in other
words, that the metabolic benefits of
eating modest amounts of chocolate might lead to reduced fat deposition per
calorie and approximately offset the added
calories (thus rendering frequent, though modest, chocolate consumption neutral with regard to weight).
In other
words, «Lite Brand X» may actually have MORE
calories than «Regular Brand Z.» Also, some pets simply
eat more of the diet food to make up for lost
calories, so even if you feed a lite formula, measured amount is still necessary.