«Go up to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun «If
those words mean anything to you then prepare to be excited, as Russian games publisher GFI has announced that Cannon Fodder 3 is in development (licensed... Read more
Look how none of
your words mean anything to me because I know my own worth.
its called CONTEXT... does
that word mean anything to you?
'' @CoachJFranklin We have 22 «commits» (as if
that word means anything to those millennials) but no fullback, why are you such a FRAUD»
We'd * love * to have this in their report characterized as a miscarriage of post publication analysis (assuming that odd
wording means anything close to what I think it means)...
Not exact matches
A couple of years back, there was a phenomenal (and by phenomenal, I
mean completely offensive, juvenile and NSFW) video about an animal called the honey badger, who just doesn't care about
anything (or in the
words of the video, doesn't give a s #!
None of these are by any
means the final
word on
anything, but they do address some of the biggest mistakes I see investors make.
Anyone could prove
anything if
words have no
meaning.
«Positive» is just a
word in this case, it does not
mean «good» or «progressive» or
anything we would associate with the
word «positive» in human social interactions or human perceptions.
A few
words taken out of context can
mean anything the speaker chooses but the understanding within the context is a different matter.
And these people have been taught for so long to take their religious leaders at their
word and that their religion
means more than
anything that they don't care whether the person is lying or not.
I know that many people associate «Messiah» with the Christian Bible, but this is a
word meaning: «an anointed one», or «to anoint», so, technically, what does that have to do with
anything?
sry, i
meant the
word «perspectives» and the
word i spelt doesn't look
anything like this so i corrected myself.
But if
words like «church» and «god»
mean anything, they are not things we can chase anyone from — or force anyone to come to.
With carefully chosen
words and images charged with first - century political
meaning, he constantly reminded his followers that they were to be a set - apart people, a people who lived counter-culturally by loving their enemies, praying for those who persecuted them, lending without expecting
anything in return, and surrendering allegiance to a crucified and risen Lord.
Take «narly,» for instance — a
word which, in my limited acquaintance, seems capable of an almost infinite range of
meanings, indicating
anything from enthusiastic approval to violent hatred.
Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the
word then that
word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have
anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he
mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.
The author uses the
words «sin willfully» (note that in the Greek it does NOT say «go on sinning») which can be taken out of context to
mean just about
anything, but IN context it specifically is referring to the forsaking of Christ in the face of persecution.
What I do believe is that we need to really know Jesus to know God — Although text
meaning can change Jesus who is the
word of God — His personality doesn't change...... so when you read behind the text and see the personality of Jesus — you get to know Him for who He is and then I can test
anything the bible or text say against His character for truth!
But if we try to accept that, I don't see how we can think
anything about
anything -
words like «love» «good» etc. lose all
meaning.
They'll just say the same
words, which are great
words, but after a while they stop
meaning anything.
Since the Greek
word for tower can
mean any high or expensive building, it is a synonym for
anything important.
I am not saying disappointment on your article, my only point is that its faith, and only God can judge the correctness... The
word of God cultivates the mind, and the seed of faith should bloom in its natural way, urging
anything to study by
words and its
meaning is in - vain because the use of that will not gain you
anything from God, but yes maybe in politics and people like you.
And when I started a public radio program on religion, ethics and
meaning seven years ago, I was also quite aware that I was inviting people to put
words around something as intimate as
anything we try to talk about, and as ultimately ineffable.
You don't have
anything to say to the
words I am placing in front of you other than personal attacks, which
means your position is weak and you lack the skills to reason beyond what you've been told by someone else.
Beloved, do the
words of Jesus
mean anything?
It is the type of Christian who would rather talk about doctrine, theology, and the
meanings of various biblical
words and passages without ever actually doing
anything.
If you had your preacher here to tell you the
meaning of the
words I wrote, you would understand my
words to have
meant that anytime
anything mentions atheism it sends the christians into a tizzy, like its an assault on their personal beliefs, Atheists have know for ever that there are christians around.
Witness we must, by
word and deed, if the gospel is to
mean anything more to the world around us than an inherited body of moral platitudes, eminently respectable but of doubtful practicality.
However, in sheer vacuity, none of these
words would
mean anything.
If
words inherently don't
mean anything, then it could be argued that de Man's Nazi
words didn't
mean anything incriminating.
We do not say that in what follows there is
anything like a full account of the
meaning of the pre-existence of the Son or of the
Word, but, whatever else that doctrine may or may not
mean, it does
mean this.
«No
words mean or can say
anything, except as one knows, with inexpressible and unsayable immediacy, what the
words are pointing at or showing, independently of the
words themselves.
This is at the very center of the crisis of the family since the
word means, if it
means anything, that certain people exist on special terms with each other, which terms are more or less unconditional.
These
words are symbolic of the Yehudi's life and are the most fitting for its close; for of all of the characters in this novel, deeply religious though they are, it is only he who has declared God's oneness, only he who has refused to work for redemption with external
means and who has refused to accept a division of the world between God and the devil or a redemption that is
anything less than the redemption of all evil and the recognition of God as the only power in the universe.
What John Paul saw, and what the Council Fathers addressed in the declaration's final draft, is that
words like goodness, freedom, and beauty don't
mean anything without an anchor.
In the Hebrew language of the Old Testament, the
word used for «worship» — shachah —
means more to bow down than
anything else.
shuuut up with your blasphemy, only priests of the ancient
word would cry blasphemy that
word does not
mean anything anymore unless you will go and stone the writer to death.
Some scholars have thought that the
word refers to a relapse into barbarian or nomadic customs some time before the apostleship of Muhammad, but it should be taken to
mean the falling away from the pure monotheism of Abraham and Ishmael to the idolatry which, more than
anything else, the Prophet denounced with all his power.
Among other things, he opposed in a pamphlet the idea that marriage between a non-Sayyid man and a Sayyid's daughter should be forbidden; he opposed the custom of regarding Sayyid as a hereditary title, like Sharif, for descendants of the Prophet, for the
word does not
mean anything more than gentleman, or the title Mr. Of course such a pamphlet caused a break with the Organization for the Good, for it included several Sayyids.
«Textual ambiguities also make it clear... that whatever Job's last
words may
mean, they convey
anything but a simple confession of sin,» Balentine writes.
The FDA, in order not to create «confusion» in people who see the
word coconut to
mean it is actually is a tree nut, decided to rule that
anything containing coconuts be labeled as a «tree - nut».
For these graduate students, the
word «gourmet» now carries a new
meaning that brings to mind
anything but the real definition of gourmet.
Manuka honey was discovered back in 1990 by Prof Molan and because they didn't know what made manuka honey anti-bacterial he coined it unique manuka factor (UMF) and non-peroxide activity (NPA), however, this doesn't
mean anything it was
words he created.
It's not only springtime, but Easter as well, and if that
word should
mean anything to you, it's that chocolate rabbits and hard - boiled neon eggs are moments away from entering your culinary periphery.
Not to think their
words don't
mean anything right now, because they do.
We old farts will sit in our chairs and continue to judge but pretty soon our
words just won't
mean anything anymore and the world will keep on turning!
than Ozil when both are inform and is Ramsey not a better box to box player than Cazorla when both are inform and do not even deny even if you have your own opinion.Why not put Cazorla in Ozil's position and put Ramsey in the box to box position where he plays best.Can you imagine Giroud on the wings and Mertesacker at right back.I for one still stand by my
word that Ramsey is a better box to box player than Cazorla yet peeps will deny.Which position did Ramsey play when he was at his best some seasons ago.To me he is better than him in that role.I remember the man utd match last season yh.Also Cazorla can do
anything Ozil can do and do it better including shooting.I
mean what is this we are not accepting the realities of the team but we ourselves are forging our favourites into the team.Do this and you will see we will be better.I just do not get it at allllll.Please share your views on my comment on what you think
At any rate who cares if Le Coq ai nt going to the euro's it does nt affect us, it also worth noting that the season ticket letters go out in a few weeks wich
means we will be linked to every player under the sun until that time is done and then we'll end up with noone new cos as Wenger said last season «there are no available players out there who are better than what we have» nice play on
words there the key
word being «Available» No one is available unless its on a freeand that
means they are too old or are sh!t Wenger just wont spend the money that we do have but he has too if he wants to win
anything worth a damn
But these lists aren't
meant to be the final
word on
anything.