I typed at 108
words per minute on the 10fastfingers.com typing test, which is just over my usual 107 wpm.
Those measurements allowed me to hit 70
words per minute on the 10fastfingers typing test, which is well above my 60 wpm norm.
I typed at 106
words per minute on the 10fastfingers.com typing test, just under my usual 107 wpm average, and I managed to maintain my usual 2 percent error rate.
I managed to reach 72
words per minute on the 10FastFingers typing test, which is higher than my usual 65 wpm.
There's also no way I'm going to read articles at 425
words per minute on paper.
I hit 59
words per minute on the Ten Thumbs Typing Test, just below my usual 60 wpm.
That translated to firm, springy feedback, which enabled us to achieve 60
words per minute on the Ten Thumbs Typing test, noticeably higher than our usual 55 wpm average.
During the spring screening period, Maria read 89
words per minute on a grade - level passage with 87 % accuracy, which is below grade - level expectations (150 words, 95 % accuracy).»
Dr. Mark David Milliron comments, «While the new generations send text messages at 60 words per minute, the Baby Boomers text at six
words per minute on average.»
Not exact matches
When the
word «hot» appears
on the display, add the olive oil then brown the chops in batches
on both sides, about 3 to 4
minutes per side.
There have been thousands of
words of criticism, from pundits and Arsenal fans alike, blaming last weekend's defeat to Chelsea
on Per Mertesacker for getting himself sent off in the 20th
minute, but Arsene Wenger has come out in defence of the Big Flippin German saying that he has also been Arsenal saviour in the past, but he does agree it was a mistake by the experienced defender.
I sometimes shuddered imagining the sort of advertisements that would be run
on this theme, if money and time were no object: «Let's have Oliver Letwin in the foreground spouting gangster rap at 120
words per minute, and in the background we'll have Nicholas Soames and John Redwood break - dancing... yes, perfect!»
The software can determine whether the people are actually at their desks as well as very nuanced metrics of their computer usage, from number of
words typed
per minute and mouse clicks to where their eyes go
on the screen.
For a beginner to reach a speed of 40
words per minute, the person would need 56 hours of training
on a QWERTY keyboard (an average of four hours
per day during my two weeks of chicken pox) but only 18 hours
on a Dvorak keyboard.
The participants were asked to «point and click»
on letters — similar to using a normal computer mouse — to type specific sentences, and their typing rate in
words per minute was measured.
Indeed, the highest performing participant could,
on average, type nearly 8
words per minute.
For our final analysis, we conducted a stepwise regression in which the most powerful school level (systematic internal assessment and parent links) and classroom level (time in small - group instruction and time in independent reading) variables were simultaneously regressed
on our most robust outcome measure, fluency as indexed by
words correct
per minute on a grade level passage.
This reading fluency app allows kids to time themselves and calculates
words read
per minute on the spot.
Composite z - score
on three project reading measures: spring reading
words residual, spring retelling at reading level residual, and spring
words - correct -
per -
minute residual 2.
In the fall (for grades 2 — 3) and spring (grades 1 — 3) students were assessed
on words correct
per minute on a grade level passage, retelling
on an instructional level passage, and a
word list (again comprised of common sight
words and some
words with predictable spellings).
One student in Tier 2 of Response to Intervention increased from 30
words per minute to 96 and is now
on grade level — in just 3 months!
For every 10 % increase in the coding of coaching in
word recognition strategies, students» fluency score increased by 8.9
words correct
per minute on average.
If we note that students increased their scores by an average of 20
words correct
per minute per year (see Table 7) and that school scores
on the collaborative leadership scale ranged from 1.1 to 1.9 with a mean of 1.7 (out of a high score of 3), then we can surmise that, at least in principle, a school gaining one additional point
on the collaborative leadership scale could make up a year's worth of fluency performance.
For every 10 % increase in the coding of active responding, students» fluency score increase
on average by 5.4
words correct
per minute.
Words correct
per minute on passage from Johns (1997).
In the fall, children in grades 2 - 6 were individually assessed
on fluency (
words correct
per minute) based
on their reading of a BRI passage (Johns, 1997) that was one grade level below their grade placement.
For every 10 % increase in the coding of phonics instruction, students» fluency score decreased by 3.0
words correct
per minute on average.
The software automatically calculates the student's
words - correct -
per -
minute (wcpm) score
on each passage and averages the scores.
For example, by the end of first grade we want all children to read at least 40
words correct
per minute on a first grade reading passage and demonstrate a level of reading comprehension that is commensurate with this level of fluency which
on the DRA is a Level 18 or higher.
An individual report for each student provides the student's average
words - correct -
per -
minute (wcpm) score and general recommendations based
on the student's results.
And with Spritz working
on its new proprietary speed - reading app that may get you up to 500
words per minute or higher (I confess, as an «industry reader,» I'm intrigued), you might start seeing a morsel of Tolstoy from Lee and Love as pretty spacious stuff when it lands
on your iPhone as the cock crows.
Additionally, the typical conversational has around 140 - 180
words per minute and we can easily comprehend everything that was said, in audiobook terms that is playback
on 2x the normal speed.
So if I spent that 15
minutes per day writing
on a novel, every day for one year, I would finish a 90,000
word plus novel, a large paperback book, in 365 days.
We averaged 53
words per minute with a zero percent error rate
on Ten Thumbs Typing Test, a little below our normal 55 wpm / 1 percent error rate.
On the Ten Thumbs Typing Test, we scored 50
words per minute, compared to our usual 55 wpm.
On the IReST evaluation, those with glaucoma read 147 vs. the control group 163 words per minute (wpm); on the MNRead, those with glaucoma read 172 vs. the control group 186 wpm; and on the sustained silent reading test, those with glaucoma read 179 vs. the control group 218 wpm — a 16 percent slower reading spee
On the IReST evaluation, those with glaucoma read 147 vs. the control group 163
words per minute (wpm);
on the MNRead, those with glaucoma read 172 vs. the control group 186 wpm; and on the sustained silent reading test, those with glaucoma read 179 vs. the control group 218 wpm — a 16 percent slower reading spee
on the MNRead, those with glaucoma read 172 vs. the control group 186 wpm; and
on the sustained silent reading test, those with glaucoma read 179 vs. the control group 218 wpm — a 16 percent slower reading spee
on the sustained silent reading test, those with glaucoma read 179 vs. the control group 218 wpm — a 16 percent slower reading speed.
Using the So You Think You Can Type app, we scored anywhere from 102
words per minute to 48 wpm, depending
on which sample sentence we were given to copy.
On the Ten Thumbs Typing Test, we scored an average of 74
words per minute with an error rate of 1 percent using the Transformer Book's keyboard.
When I tried to type quickly
on the 10FastFingers.com typing test, I found my fingers stumbling over each other and was able to produce only 68
words per minute, a drop from my 80 - wpm average.
If the average American Adult has a reading speed of 300
words per minute, then it is reasonable to assume that a typical reader will focus his / her attention,
on average, to around 450
words on a typical blog (I have just pasted that threshold, so congratulations loyal reader for being above average).
has a reading speed of 300
words per minute, then it is reasonable to assume that a typical reader will focus his / her attention,
on average, to around 450
words on a typical blog (I have just pasted that threshold, so congratulations loyal reader for being above average).
Using Swift Typing Test Lite, we notched 27
words per minute with just one error, which is
on a par with our average touch - screen typing speed.
When I tested out the hybrid's keyboard
on the 10fastfingers.com typing test, I clicked my way to 74
words per minute, which isn't too far from my 80 - wpm average.
Taking the 10FastFingers typing test
on the Inspiron 11 3000, I clicked my way to a pace of 72
words per minute with 99 percent accuracy.
On 10FastFingers.com, I hovered near my typical average of 75
words per minute, but I consistently entered 10 or more incorrect
words during the 1 -
minute test.
My first two attempts
on 10fastfingers.com yielded 68 and 66
words per minute, short of my typical 75 wpm average.
When using the Ten Thumbs Typing Tutor test, we scored a rate of 86
words per minute with a 2 percent error rate, around the same rate we get
on a full - size ThinkPad.
If you're sitting there listening to a podcast and feeling like it's just sort of droning
on, well, that's because your brain can actually take in information at like 300 to 400 or 500
words per minute, while most podcasts are not spoken that quickly.
I tested my Apple Magic Keyboard against my WASD keyboard with Cherry MX Brown switches, and I was actually faster with the Apple Magic Keyboard by a couple of
words per minute,
on average.
Pro tip: Throw in a New York Times crossword digital subscription for $ 6.95
per month if you want to give yourself a 20 - 45
minute brain break
on a daily basis and learn cool new
words like epee and Erato.