Not exact matches
King Sweeney and Blakeman rejected the amendment, arguing that it would require their entire law firms to disclose all their clients, placing them and the firms
at a
competitive disadvantage for all legal
work.
The big firms and ABSes will be able to take on investment, use the skills of non-lawyers for
work that is not strictly legal, and collaborate with one another on big - idea solutions, software, resources, etc. «Solosmalls» would be hard - pressed to do the same, which will put them
at a serious
competitive disadvantage.
The Motion Judge found that «the plaintiff is
at a
competitive disadvantage given her age in the broader job market, having virtually no
work experience outside that of the defendant, a not for profit organization.»
If you are considering
working somewhere you don't currently live, you probably feel as if you're
at a
competitive disadvantage compared to those who reside in relative proximity to the job.