Not exact matches
this blog is not
working with me... I'll have to catch you guys on another post... it will not accept long post... This is my main point against the scientific
method argument; it is
consensus in the scientific community that most of our Universe is unseen.
However, since customer training is still in its early stages, there is little
consensus on what training
methods work best.
Second, we applied two strategies —
consensus scoring and a rank - ordering
method — to estimate comparability in Year 1 of the NH PACE pilot based upon the expert judgment of 85 teachers using 505 student
work samples.
Then he explained how it
works; that the process of peer - review is the best
method of establishing and progressing the scientific
consensus that we have.
The point then, is that the likes of Grimes hiding his own political motivations behind statistical
methods and the «scientific
consensus» isn't as much the
work of a conspiracy as it is simply the expression of bad faith.
The lopsided
consensus of
working (i.e. publishing in peer - reviewed specialist venues) climate scientists for AGW is justified by the established
methods of the Earth Sciences, on a firm foundation of basic Physics.