The first and third waves, which were
the work of nonbelievers with overt ideological hostility to Christian belief, are matter for another study.
Not exact matches
As anyone familiar with my own
work will expect, I have many serious reservations about this book, the most inclusive being that I do not think the author helps either the
nonbeliever or the believer to understand the problem
of faith and New Testament criticism.
CNN: My take: «Atheist» isn't a dirty word, congresswoman Chris Stedman, author
of «Faitheist: How an Atheist Found Common Ground with the Religious,» writes that when Rep. Kyrsten Sinema's campaign said «the terms non-theist, atheist or non-believer are not befitting
of her life's
work or personal character» it implied that there is something unfavorable about
nonbelievers.
Yet despite minor structural differences at Vanderbilt and elsewhere there was an inflexible understanding at
work: that a rigorous academy would not harbor learned discourse about religion in its central precincts unless conducted with the systematic detachment
of nonbelievers.
«For when Gentiles [
nonbelievers] who do not have the Law do instinctively the things
of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the
work of the Law written on their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets
of men through Christ Jesus.»
The real myth, in other words, may be that there can be religious freedom at all in the modern state without a strong religious tradition acting both as a curb to the state's power on behalf
of believers and
nonbelievers alike and also as an alternative narrative within which people can
work out their individual visions
of the good life.