And most seasoned staff members have refined their own personal standards for what constitutes appropriate
workplace alcohol use.
In the absence of evidence of an existing
workplace alcohol use problem, it concluded that a dangerous workplace was not, on its own, reason...
In the absence of evidence of an existing
workplace alcohol use problem, it concluded that a dangerous workplace was not, on its own, reason to implement such a policy.
In Irving, eight incidents over a fifteen year period were found not to reflect a significant problem with
workplace alcohol use.
Not exact matches
(2) may require that employees shall not be under the influence of
alcohol or be engaging in the illegal
use of drugs at the
workplace;
These restrictions will be similar to those
used to control the consumption of
alcohol in public spaces and
workplaces.
Both sides agreed that proper safety procedures were paramount to preventing
workplace accidents and that such procedures included preventing drug and
alcohol use at the
workplace.
«What Association Executives Need to Know About Drug and
Alcohol Use in the
Workplace,» Minnesota Society of Association Executives (St. Paul, Minnesota, September 17, 1996)
Similar to policies relating to the consumption of
alcohol in the
workplace, employers should ensure they have clear
workplace policies prohibiting the non-medical
use of marijuana in the
workplace and clearly outlining the consequences of employee impairment as a result of such non-medical
use.
Hopefully the Supreme Court will
use this opportunity to lessen the legal ambiguity surrounding the
use of mandatory random
alcohol testing in safety - sensitive
workplaces, as the provinces have been divergent on this issue.
The Supreme Court of Canada has concluded that a
workplace policy which provides for random
alcohol testing is not justified when there is an absence of evidence of an existing problem with
alcohol use in the
workplace, even where the
workplace is considered inherently dangerous.
A majority concluded that the random testing policy was unjustified because there was an absence of evidence of
alcohol use in the
workplace.
Further, the Supreme Court noted that safety has never been held to justify random testing even in the case of «highly safety sensitive» or «inherently dangerous
workplaces» such as railways and chemical plants or those that pose a risk of explosion in the absence of a «demonstrated problem with
alcohol use in that
workplace» (CEP at para 45).
As affirmed by the Task Force, drug and
alcohol use or impairment in the
workplace can pose a danger to everyone in the
workplace, including the person who is impaired.
Workplace policies dealing with recreational marijuana and medical marijuana should largely reflect policies created to address any other use of prescription medication, drug and alcohol use in the w
Workplace policies dealing with recreational marijuana and medical marijuana should largely reflect policies created to address any other
use of prescription medication, drug and
alcohol use in the
workplaceworkplace.
The cases of Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. Irving Pulp & Paper, Ltd and R. v. Smith, among others, confirmed that Canadians have a constitutional right to
use medical marijuana and that employers must balance their interest in mandatory drug and
alcohol testing to produce a safe
workplace with employee privacy interests.
However, the report does not deal with how employers will control the
use of cannabis in the
workplace and how it will impact their drug and
alcohol policies.
Today, a majority of the Supreme Court of Canada upheld an arbitration award which concluded that a random
alcohol testing policy for
use in a safety sensitive
workplace was not justified.
The decision demonstrates the importance of having a well - prepared fitness for duty policy and a proper
alcohol and drug testing policy in place in dangerous
workplaces, as well as the need to get legal advice before terminating workers for substance
use.
«We're starting to get more calls on it and absolutely I think it's going to be a function of being clear in setting expectations and reminding employees of expectations around drug and
alcohol use in the
workplace and that may require employers to take a look at current policies and make sure they still read how they want in light of the new legislation coming down and provide refresher training on expectations,» says Cukierman.
United States About Blog Thousands of employers
use WorkExcel.com to educate employees, train supervisors, reduce risk, enhance
workplace wellness tips, and have more effective Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and for
alcohol / drug training.
She has worked in the areas of child obesity prevention, health promotion, seniors» mental health,
alcohol warning statement labelling,
alcohol use in teenagers, nutrition literacy, Indigenous health behaviour,
workplace health promotion and evaluation, health policy development, and qualitative research methodologies.