The lack of a limitation period means
workplace sexual harassment incidents have a long life — and could come back to haunt employers many years after they occur.
Failing that, the best defence to
a workplace sexual harassment incident is by properly responding, handling and resolving it.
Not exact matches
The
incident that left her family devastated also propelled them to spend the next 15 years advocating for changes to prevent
sexual harassment in the
workplace.
Each
incident underscores how
workplace training on responding to
sexual harassment isn't superfluous.
The airlines» comments fit with broader studies that estimate three of every four
sexual harassment incidents in the
workplace in United States go unreported.
So far, 215 claims of various inappropriate
workplace incidents including
sexual harassment have been investigated, as Business Insider previously reported.
With more
sexual harassment cases coming into the light, a debate is developing on how to stop similar
workplace incidents from emerging in the future.
As a result of several
workplace incidents, the complainant alleged that she had been subjected to discrimination on the basis of sex and family status as well as
sexual harassment.
How these
incidents or complaints of
workplace harassment and
sexual harassment are investigated and dealt with are set out in the Act.
«Disagreeing with the trial court's grant of summary judgment, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has held that 3
incidents over two years, combined with other testimony showing continuing problems in the
workplace, is enough to require a jury [to] sort out whether a restaurant should be held liable for
sexual harassment...»
It will require that all
incidents and complaints of
workplace sexual harassment be appropriately investigated, that a complainant be informed of the results of the investigation and any corrective action, and that the employer's
workplace harassment program be reviewed at least annually.
The trial judge found that the
incidents complained of took place outside the
workplace, the employee had made a timely apology to the victim which he had accepted and several of the
incidents alleged to have amounted to
sexual harassment and breach of the employment contract in fact was found to be «consensual conduct among friends».
The victim later held a press conference and indicated that there was more than one
incident, and lashed out at her employer for not taking her written complaints seriously and not acting on them accordingly to protect her and prevent
sexual harassment from continuing in the
workplace.