Sentences with phrase «works referencing not»

Wryly, these works reference not any Dutch master proper, but a brand of cigars whose packaging co-opts Rembrandt's The Sampling Officials of the Amsterdam Drapers» Guild to commercial ends.

Not exact matches

You wouldn't hire an employee without checking references and looking at their past work.

Edwards even worked a reference to past work into the new video, as ad nerds will definitely get a laugh at theLEGENDofKARL's not - so subtle take on the «Mad World» «s emo - soundtrack style during one particularly violent scene.

You write «economy - wide automation of jobs is not a technological impossibility; it is a psychological impossibility» with reference to people's unwillingness to believe we could automate ourselves out of work.

«Hence, if these employees were unable to work during the September survey reference pay period because they had evacuated, or because their establishments were not open for business due to power failures or other effects of the hurricanes, they were not included on September payrolls.»

I wrote an improvement of Alicia's email based on these concepts: — specificity of: target b2b and expected results — be educational with numbers and reference to a case study — do nt talk bad about outbound marketing, but tell him how to do it better — write even shorter to the point — social proof: drop big companies of other industries — scarcity: this email is sent to 10 competitors but we only work with the first per city

The benefits they may have received — such as the knowledge of how a production or accounting office functions or references for future jobs — are the results of simply having worked as any other employee works, not of internships designed to be uniquely educational to the interns and of little utility to the employer.

The lab says CryptoPunks are «almost an ERC20 token» in that they can be viewed in a wallet, though «none of the other methods are the same since you're not transferring a simple balance, but need to reference which specific Punk you want to work with.»

That, for example, is why few folks are willing to criticize their colleagues or former companies: 1 today's former co-worker or former manager is tomorrow's angel investor or job reference, and memories are long and reputations longer.2 That holds particularly true for venture capitalists: as Marc Andreessen told Barry Ritholtz on a recent podcast, «We make our money on the [startups] that work and we make our reputation on the ones that don't.»

So I reference that weekly to check out what's working and what's not, make sure that my risk / reward ratios are in place.

ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to do some work to reference a credible study.

Although the book is best regarded more as a presentation of the Supreme Court's religious - freedom work than as a direct study of the questions underlying that work» the work of constitutional scholars, for example, is for the most part only referenced, not engaged» it is, nonetheless, recommended.

Less noticed than references to homosexuality in Pope Francis» widely circulated remarks to the press on the Rio - to - Rome papal airplane was this comment on developing a theology of women: The role of women doesn't end just with being a mother and with house work... we....

Anyway the point was penacost not referenced in either of those works.

Frost & Hirsch is a good reference for what does not work.

1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women, children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women / children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns families against each other, those that love family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your family, you are an infidel)

If the product of their work is not taken seriously» as, for instance, an invaluable reference in a synod of bishops dedicated to a program of comprehensive reform» it may be a very, very long time before people of their quality will make a comparable effort to help the bishops with much of anything.

It is specifically with reference to future questions not yet named that the Jesus of John 14 - 16 promised further leading and «greater works.»

Christian is here speaking of the concept «event» as used in Whitehead's earlier works; the term doesn't change its reference in the later works, though it practically drops out of the picture as being a less than ultimate concept (corresponding to the notion of a structured society) which gives way to the category of «actual entity» as the term descriptive of ultimate, concrete reality.

The creation.com article has defects with respect to the reference to Behe's work (which ironically argues for multi-residue protein mutations occurring all the time), but with respect to the Lenski 2008 article, as hypothesized mechanisms they are not «incorrect»; however, neither are they «correct.»

Nonetheless, as Frege writes to Husserl, it is sufficient if poetic strings or works of art have a sense, but for scientific work, i.e., to be useful, we must not lack a reference.

Not proven beyond a doubt but by referencing various written works by many of his «disciples» and others (monks etc) over 600 years AD who all had the exact same story though threatened with death etc it seems HE did live.

In the first place, Whitehead's conception of God was not fully worked out or the various references to God, even within Process and Reality, well integrated.

Citing formerly wrought judicial language, she calls the reference «ceremonial deism» and pointedly insists that it does not intend to place the speaker or listener in «a penitent state of mind,» create «spiritual communion» or invoke «divine aid.»

My friend didn't spill the beans on any specifics, but perhaps that explains why so many Christian songs sound like they maybe started out as a run - of - the - mill love song before the writer realized that by adding a few references to Heaven, this could work as a pretty decent worship song.

The only thing that would put us in «good standing» with the ex-gay and similar folk would be to admit we are gay and always will be («reparative» therapy doesn't work and denial ends in repression taking the form of promiscuity), and most of us aren't called to celibacy (in the only Biblical sense of the term, as Jesus makes reference to and Paul discusses at length).

I wouldn't have said anything if you merely said you didn't like it, but you attributed things to her work that are directly contradicted IN THAT VERY WORK you were referencwork that are directly contradicted IN THAT VERY WORK you were referencWORK you were referencing.

Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz

The one reference that didn't work for me was 2 Timothy 2:10 (NIV) «Therefore I endure everything for the sake of the elect, that they too may obtain the salvation that is in Christ Jesus, with eternal glory.»

The world of the text designates the reference of the work of discourse, not what is said, but about what it is said.

I referenced hermeneutics and if you're so curious, I'd suggest you do your own research (be aware, it takes hard work and in depth study) and not rely on someone from a CNN comments section.

[39] Regarding chronology, Timothy Barnes, in Tertullian, op cit., points out that this treatise, which comes from the period before Tertullian became a Montanist, does not yield more precise information when the criteria regarding historical allusions, references to other works, doctrinal progression and style, are applied.

These references suggest Whitehead's familiarity with Creative Evolution and Bergson's other works, to be sure, but the ideas are not utilized in any sense remotely resembling an evolutionary cosmology, or suggesting any real influence of Bergson's own variation of «emergent» evolution (cf. PR xii / vii, 33 / 49, 82 / 126, 107 / 163, 114 / 174, 209 / 319, 220 / 336, 280 / 428, 321 / 489).

Rather, Whitehead worked out a sophisticated account of concrescence that (a) allows the use of «before» and «after» in reference to the various stages of concrescence while (b) also affirming that each stage of the concrescence is fully present to every other stage.30 In finite entities, the concrescence has «bounds,» that is, we can assign temporal limits «within which» a finite concrescence takes place.31 God's concrescence is not so bounded.

The point David and the others are making and the NT makes as well in reference to even Jesus is that you can go through all the motions of God given things (works!)

In all of these we can not fail to note — whatever else is the work of the Word — the sharp, specific references to the throbbing life of contemporary human history.

Is it too far fetched to infer from the reference to shepherds and wise men in the first few pages of SMW that he did not begin serious work on his lectures until the winter vacation, in an atmosphere of Christmas preparations?

If not, then they will be discredited, and all without reference to anything but human working principles.

Fact: you don't understand how carbon dating works «Furthermore you can claim 4.5 billion all day long but SCIENCE states that is a meaningless number unless you state what that number is in reference to» WRONG.

This what could be expected when your source is not the scientific literature, but rather a «How Stuff Works» website which in turn references other non-primary literature sources: http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/life/evolution/origin-of-life-on-earth5.htm

The baptismal reference, then, is not just to baptism as a salvific event in its covenant pledge but also to baptism as protecting one from evil spiritual forces... One has in this work a massive piece of scholarship that seems to have laid to rest some options for interpreting 1 Pet 3 and certainly must be consulted by anyone working on this passage in the future.

Where so many solutions are possible, and so much hangs on the evidence of a single verse, it is not easy to choose; but two considerations point to the verse being the work of the author himself and having a special reference to the story of the last chapter, or to a part only of the gospel.

Furthermore, it has insisted — and rightly — that Christianity is a faith and not a philosophical or ethical system; it is a faith in which affirmations are made about an historical person in whom God is believed to be specially at work; it has insisted that we have to do with a tradition which has been nourished by the lives of holy men and women, by saints and scholars, but which is based upon the gospel, whose grounding is in the scriptural record and witness and which therefore can not exist without constant reference to that «deposit» of God's self - revelation.

the bible has lists of many sins that are punishable by death some that are punishable by exile and some that are punishable by tribunal and taking of property when the bible refers to all sins being the same it is they are all an abomination to the lord not a reference to how serious a sin they are do you really believe that murdering a 2 year old with acid is the same kind of sin as calling in sick to work when your not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG it is unbelievable how ignorant you all are and how you think you can turn the bible on itself a true Christian that has read thoroughly and has no agenda like ms cnn here does knows the difference

Other references are made to Duhem but not to the only person to write a monograph on the life and works of Pierre Duhem: Stanley Jaki.

If you need to refer to your own work which is currently unpublished, then please do not include this work in the reference list.

I have a self - imposed rule that my bookmarks bar must remain relegated to academic links and references, lest I get distracted when I come online to do work (which I can't seem to escape — but perhaps it's for the better!).

I don't know if it's completely wrong to reference another famous cook's work, but Paula Deen's Tomato Pie is yummy.

Going by the logic of the article I made reference to, that partnership will not work.

Gettleman talked about building quality depth and working with Eli Manning and Odell Beckham Jr., and how you «don't quit on talent» in reference to troubled cornerback Eli Apple.