Sentences with phrase «world gdp»

According to the World Economic Forum, by 2027, 10 % of world GDP will be reflected in blockchain.

The project explored the ability for distributed ledgers to support and adhere to the international standards for payment systems, known as PFMIs (Principles for Financial Markets Infrastructures) set by CPMI (Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures) under BIS (Bank for International Settlements), representing countries from around the world that together make up about 95 % of world GDP.

Under low - growth scenarios (A2 and B2), world GDP would double by 2020 and increase more than 10-fold by 2100.

The damages caused by 10 °C of warming are typically reckoned at 10 — 30 % of world GDP (33, 34), roughly equivalent to a recession to economic conditions of roughly two decades earlier in time.

I often hear claims that there are $ 600T of derivatives contract, with the implication that over a decade of world GDP could vanish at any minute.

How do you distinguish the contribution of carbon to total world GDP as opposed to, say, increases in civil liberties in those countries that have contributed the most to world GDP growth?

Let's start off by attributing 50 % of the increase in total world GDP since 1750 (adjusted for inflation, of course) to «carbon» (i.e. the availability of a reliable source of energy).

What is so strange for $ 20 trillion in 87 years????? Estimating current global GDP conservatively at 70 trillion, and assuming no growth (which is impossible), 20 trillion amount to * less than * 3.3 ‰ of the cumulative world GDP for 87 years!

If stabilization costs x % for world GDP, for a few companies, there is a much larger impact on profits.

The value of SCC is that, if it is grossly over stated, as it seems to be, then correcting the value of SCC is the way to demonstrates that GHG emissions are not a major threat to the economy and we can and should move on to more important issues — like restoring world GDP growth.

I certainly support those things and find it hard to believe that diverting 1 % of world GDP to solving the climate / energy problem will prevent us from doing all that other good stuff too.

This assumes world GDP and population will keep increasing.

Van Beers and Van den Bergh (2001) estimated that in the mid-1990s transport subsidies amounted to 225 billion US$, or approximately 0.85 % of the world GDP.

Over the same period, world GDP has increased from $ 7.3 trillion to $ 62 trillion in constant dollars, or at a CAGR of 4.4 % (or roughly three times the rate of population growth (data from Wiki).

«If this trend continued or intensified with rising global temperatures, losses from extreme weather could reach 0.5 % -1 % of world GDP by the middle of the century.»

Divide the company's GHG footprint by its contribution to GDP, as measured by gross profit (or EBITDA + Operating Expenditures for nonprofits or startups and other cases when a company is not generating revenue) divided by world GDP, and approximate growth rates through 2050 using analyst or internal financial forecasts to derive the Carbon Intensity Reduction Rate.

CRITICAL — serious drop in food production, serious water shortages, significant sea level rise, political unrest, major drop in world GDP, major animal extinctions and millions of human deaths.

But the sums of $ $ involved in the upfront costs of higher efficiency are small compared with total world GDP, total world investment, or, I emphasize, the huge sums that would have to be invested to meet the «crunch» Andy refers to.

Yes, enviros will claim there is a $ 200 billion subsidy in unpaid social costs — fine — but they will not mention the benefits of a $ 18.6 trillion US economy the FFs make possible, not to mention the world GDP.

You get far more money than the US GDP or the world GDP.

Travel and tourism's contribution to world GDP has fallen to less than 9.3 % this year — from 9.6 % in 2008.

Then longer term, there's a whole other land - grab ahead — Alphabet's US revenues still represent 47 % of total revenues, about double the US share of world GDP — that would suggest huge / long term upside growth potential in digital advertising revenues across the rest of the OECD, and particularly in emerging / frontier markets (which are now leap - frogging straight into the digital / smartphone age).

Because in reality my current allocation isn't that major... OK, versus most portfolios, perhaps it is — but emerging / frontier markets share of world GDP now equals that of developed markets!

And second, if you include holdings which have been (re --RRB- allocated elsewhere in my portfolio, my overall Ireland allocation is still a substantial % of my entire portfolio & obviously remains a massively overweight bet when you consider the Irish economy's a merely fractional share of world GDP.

Coincidentally, this leaves me smack - dab at a benchmark weighting, with the UK now representing just 3 - 4 % of world GDP — worth remembering each time you think you're underweight (or realise you're actually massively overweight).

This pernicious anomaly causes investors to blindly invest in home market stocks for a disproportionate percentage (vs. world GDP share, for example) of their portfolio.

If, on the other hand, you're v conscious of home bias (and share (s) of world GDP) but decide to focus on home market investment because of compelling valuations, that makes perfect sense.

At the very best, we can probably hope he's got 30 % of his portfolio in foreign stocks (when the US is about 25 % of world GDP), but v often the sad reality is that he's got zero direct foreign exposure.

8 Well, I guessed this wrong by a bloody multiple... The rather depressing answer is that Irish GDP constitutes only about 0.23 % of world GDP.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is projecting China's share of the world GDP will rise from 11 % in 2011 to 28 % by 2030.

USA's share of the world GDP is projected to shrink from 23 % to 18 % over the same period.

Just as an example, the Sleepy portfolio is 20 - 26 % Canada for instance, when we're roughly 8 % of world GDP.

Ooops, mistake in my previous post... I said Canada was roughly 8 % of world GDP, but it's only 2.5 % (roughly).

China is roughly 11 % -15 % of world GDP depending on whose numbers you use, yet it has less than 5 % weighting in VT..

This is true if you look at relative percentages of world GDP.

Ireland accounts for a whopping great 0.3 % of world GDP, and yet I've got 16 % of my portfolio invested in the Emerald Isle (yes, please visit, all tourist revenues gladly accepted)!?

I'm confident 16 % is far lower than the average Irish investor (and US investors are just as bad — how many realize US GDP is now just 22 % of world GDP?).

Considering the US share of world GDP, and its reserve status, USD exposure remains perfectly sensible in your portfolio (even without a positive USD perspective).

% of world GDP, Andrew Langford, COR, default, Emerald Isle, Europe, European sovereign debt crisis, Event Driven, Fairfax, FBD Holdings, Greece, home bias investing, Ireland, Irish value investing, ISEQ, Prem Watsa, Price / Book, Return on Equity, taxes, Thatcher, Total Produce, Trinity Biotech, UK, Wilbur Ross

They enjoy some key advantages — younger / faster growing populations (with far lower entitlements), labour costs that are a fraction of developed market costs, control of a major portion of the world's natural resources, low / stable debt ratios, a 50 % share of world GDP, and GDP growth expected to be twice that of developed markets.

-- First, we need to start with US GDP, which was $ 14.6 trillion in 2010, for a No. 1 country ranking and a 23 % share of world GDP

The Developing Markets Fund (ODMAX) offers investors exposure to emerging market businesses that appear likely to grow at a faster pace than world GDP.

World GDP may grow at 5.2 percent this year versus just 2 percent growth in the U.S, according to IMF forecasts.

In 1945, just after World War II, the United States accounted for 50 % of the total world GDP.

A major release of methane trapped in the frozen seabed off Russia could accelerate global warming and cause $ 60 trillion in damage, almost the size of world GDP, it said.

World GDP was forecast to fall to its lowest rate since World War II and in the UK GDP was down 2.4 % in the first quarter of 2009.

Post-war recovery was much easier in the US, which I believe held 45 % of world GDP in 1945.

We represent 27 % of the world GDP and that has decreased since 2006.

However, world GDP growth is expected to become more synchronised in 2006 as activity increases in both the euro area and Japan.

China makes up 15 percent of world GDP but just 3 percent of world stock market capitalization.