Sentences with phrase «world know their point»

There are others who have no interest in getting themselves involved in the political decisions of their country which directly and indirectly involves voting during elections and most importantly making the world know their point of view during any key decision of government for the larger populace.

Not exact matches

(I am facing that problem head - on every day as I try to write my new book on what the world will look like in 20 years - knowing that I'm going to be laughably wrong at various points along the way.

You might be surprised to know that the business world was strongly in favor of profit sharing at many points in American history, typically when the concentration of wealth was a major public worry or the country was trying to come together after a crisis.

And unlike McDonald's, whose American roots are a selling point around the world, there are almost no Canadian companies who have done well internationally by trading on their association with the Maple Leaf — with the sole exception of parka - maker Canada Goose, presumably because Canadians are thought to know something about surviving bone - chilling winter weather.

I am looking for economic tipping points ie points at which everyone knew the world of economics had changed.

That point just illustrates to me the importance of staying invested in the market no matter what crazy headlines are being written nor what events transpire around the world.

«It's been kind of annoying having to deal with that and everything else that's been going on but at this point, you know, we're changing the world.

@Mike, Actually the spread of some religions does nothing to counteract the point that different regions began worshipping different gods, it simply displays the growth of cross cultural communications and reinforces what we already know, that the world is getting «smaller».

My point was merely to show that both a God of Love or a God of Wrath can be perceived from the text, and ultimately it is up to the reader to decide if the perception of what they know the world to be like and what they assume God — if He is real — to be like.

No longer am I merely pointing out faults in the world.

fred, They were atheists as far as your god is concerned, but I think the point was why couldn't an omniscient and omnipotent god have made itself known on all continents before the European invasion of the New Worlds?

As an atheist I have no problem saying «I don't know» if someone asks me if god exists or not, but the evidence points so far that god is fictional and I operate within a world were there isn't a god.

At this point, you probably know everything you need to know about the upcoming sequel to Jurassic World.

In a very short time, the focal points of world importance will no longer be represented exclusively by European states, and this will lead to a regrouping of forces.

No, Mel Gibson and his dad are right about Jewish people, they have done everything in the last 300 years to corrupt White Christian Western culture and countries and are at the point where they can make Europeans extinct through there lies and deceit of multi-culturalism and multiracialism, every single even in the past 300 years has been manipulated by Jews in order to take control of the world, and they white christians as being the main obstacle to obtaining that goal.

It is harder to see what one sees than anyone knows because it is easier, far far easier than on can suppose.That still point of the turning world — look!

No matter the style of evangelism, crusade, one on one, or whatever, non of it has much lasting value unless it points to a deeper relationship with Christ, and leads to a relationship with His body in this world, the church.

But I know infallibly that at this point I shall be asked: This intransigent Christian radicalism of yours, doesn't it really mean withdrawal from the world?

However, recent scientific advances in the realm of the quantum world have shown that there comes a point when objective testing and validity is no longer possible.

It's not been too great for me and some of the other members of the movement... It's been kind of annoying having to deal with that and everything else that's been going on but at this point, you know, we're changing the world.

Whereas they pointed to the pantheon of gods in their unseen heavenly world, the Bible pointed to one who was in no way to be identified with the gods of ancient man, but who was known to them in the sphere of human history as the deepest reality confronting them there.

I already know that it is actually just your imagination and delusional world - view that makes you say these things, but I enjoy pointing out the holes in your words, showing you the lack of connection between what you say and the real world.

Granted, the believers are perfectly happy relying on scientists and science to — I don't know — talk to people around the world instantaneously via this comment board, and then get in their cars, and fly in planes, and use electricity, and watch TV — all of those things based on science, and yet, when someone points out that scientists have mapped the human genome and other primates and can show, irrefutably, where the different primate families branched off — well, no, no no!

This understanding of God's relationship to the world has been enormously influential in contemporary philosophy of religion, especially since the publication in 1948 of The Divine Relativity from which the above quotation was taken.2 Although the consistency of divine relativity with the understanding of simultaneity in modem physics is a recognized point of contention, the question I wish to ask is whether the theory of divine relativity is metaphysically possible.3 How could it be possible for God to know and feel the different experiences of radically distinct subjects with equal vividness all at the same time?

@Chad and @Chuckles, You both make valid points about who knew what and when and I'll admit that I am not a WWII expert, but again saying that we, the world, did nothing but watch while 6 million Jews were killed, is misleading.

Gravitational Singularity is only a theory at best, and what it concerns is something of this world, that is infinite gravity and density — however, they are not really infinite but because all the known Laws of Physics breakdown at that point, they call them infinite, hence a created matter, so it can not possibly be self - existent nor «First Cause.»

My point was before going on the glove tangent, that when inventing something to disprove you can give it any supernatural abilities which do not have to conform to the known world and thus make disproving them essentially impossible.

At that point, before a new life has truly formed, if the mother KNOWS that bringing a child into the world in her current situation will do more harm than good, why should she not have the choice?

We are to show the world, by our actions (you shall know a tree by its fruit) not by constantly pointing a finger in their chest and saying you're wrong.

In pointing to the prior reality of I - Thou knowing, Buber is not setting forth a dualism such as is implied by Nicholas Berdyaev's rejection of the world of social objectification in favour of existential subjectivity or Ferdinand Ebner's relegation of mathematical thinking to the province of the pure isolated I («Icheinsamkeit»).

But we need to remember, as we have already pointed out, that India was well known in the West because of the vigorous commercial activities that went on between India and the Mediterranean world.

It is one of theologian John Cobb's important contributions that he points so clearly to this kind of causation, which we know so well, as providing a much better way of conceiving of God's causality in the world than the concept of a God who intervenes through external causation.

The point here is rather that some people have experiences that involve a reality beyond our known physical world.

Maybe he knew that for the world to survive to the point it is today, he had to destroy it (save one family).

As a material point in the world, the icon opens a breach through which the Transcendent bursts» (no less!).

They don't know much about the world at this point in their lives, but they may know more than we think.

In the sermon, Keller points out the personal, spiritual, and social implications of the parable, while arguing that «The Christian understanding of hell is crucial to understanding your own heart, for living at peace in the world, and for knowing the love of God.

The difference between you and me is that, when I read the Bible... I read it from the point of view of what I know about the natural world — as people know it today.

The fall of man is no longer taken as an event at the beginning of human history, nor is the «end of history» a literal conception of a point of time at which the world ceases to be.

See how close we are at this point in History to having the Bible translated into all of the known languages in the world.

For the present, however, the point is that the quality of the Spirit, and hence our criterion for knowing whether any given spirit is indeed to be linked with the Spirit of God, is for Christians the congruity which that spirit does, or does not, possess with what we have learned of God, God's character and purpose and manner of operation, through Jesus Christ in his revelation of the divine nature and agency in the world.

As it was pointed out by Olof Klohr of Jena, «The atheism of Marxism is, in essence, not the «No» to religion and God, but the «Yes» to the world, the «Yes» to the conscious formation of human life.

Something doesn't feel right, because from my vantage point, there is a world of difference between I don't know and I don't care.

One of the most well - known passages in Atlas Shrugged goes on and on about the evil of religion in so many ways; John Galt doesn't use this as an incidental point in his radio address but makes no bones that there is no religion in his world view.

Instead, Paul's only point in writing Romans 8:28 - 30 is to encourage Christians that no matter what happens to them, God is with them, will not abandon them, and just as He has had them in mind since before the foundation of the world, He will not abandon them to the trials and testing they are facing.

Seems to me that you can throw out the bible and obviously recognize that the world and life as we know it «will» end at some point.

It follows «that what we want to know about, from the point of view either of curiosity or of technology, chiefly resides in those aspects of the world disclosed in causal efficacy: but that what we can distinctly register is chiefly to be found among the perception the mode of presentational immediacy» (PR 169 / 257).

That was the starting point of a series of conquests which led to the creation of the greatest empire the world has ever known.

The only one who can not is Lucifer because he do not want to, God heart is not made of iron, if there are evil people alive in this world it is only because God want them to repent to, there are most evil people who as a children or teenager was sweet but because of another being became evil, Only God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chair.

At that point, Mr. Wright knew that he had a very intelligent son — one who could interact with the world but just couldn't control his body.