In short, this isn't your old professor's
world of life science.
The world of the life sciences and digital health isn't exactly known for its gender diversity.
Not exact matches
The slice
of patients above the age
of 60 consumes about 85 %
of the drugs and devices and diagnostics out there,» says Justin Stephenson, senior
life sciences analyst at Vancouver - based independent investment dealer Haywood Securities Inc. «That is only going to get significantly bigger in the western
world, which is the main market for Canadian health - care products in the next five to 10 years.
Shortly thereafter, in 1992, just as Berners - Lee's
World Wide Web had come to fruition, Neal Stephenson was inspired by the recent invention, which led to him publishing Snow Crash, a
science - fiction novel that illustrated much
of today's online
life, including a virtual reality where people meet, do business, and play.
As he prodded the prime minister, Nye, best known as the host
of the 1990s PBS show «Bill Nye the
Science Guy,» and more recently for the Netflix series «Bill Nye Saves the
World,» cited a study by a group called The Solutions Project that concluded Canada could
live entirely without fossil fuels if it fully embraced renewable energy sources.
If you've always dreamed
of a
world where all marketing's
science, technology, and psychology finally align behind truly making a difference in people's
lives, this is the trend you've been waiting for.
Our vision is to one day see a
world where degenerative brain diseases do not exist and
science and technology play a direct role in extending the healthy
lives of ourselves and our loved ones.
I came away from this recent conversation with a deeper understanding
of the ethical risks posed by AI, insights into behavioral data
science, and cautious optimism that we can use these tools and technology to create the financial
world we want to
live in.
«The arrival
of the Johnson & Johnson Innovation, JLABS model to MaRS» West Tower reinforces Ontario's position as one
of the
world's leading
life sciences clusters,» said Brad Duguid, Minister
of Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure.
You can clearly see how the allied
sciences and complementary developments
of these trends will reshape our
world, our
lives, and our work.
Because
of a court case in Louisiana that expressly forbid Biblical Creationism being taught in school
science classes, the wording changed and the authors removed references to catastrophism, a
world - wide flood, a recent inception
of the earth or
life, the concept
of kinds, or any concepts from Genesis.
I will have to
live my whole
life surrounded by a
world filled with mental midgets who have fooled themselves that faith and belief in deities is the answer instead
of using their minds to work out problems, study
science and figure out how we leave this planet when it becomes inhabitable in 4 billion years.
Science has proven the
world to be billions
of years old, and has proven that
life has existed on this planet for hundreds
of millions
of years.
Just remember that even two
of the 20th century's greatest scientist Werner Von Braun and Albert Einstein both attributed to the existence
of the
world and
life to intelligent design and trusted
science to search out the evidence to back it up.
and being aware
of your environment, being respectful
of those
of all beliefs and none beliefs, and
of our
world, and its about personal responsibility, with that said why is is such a bad thing to believe in something greater than yourself, how can somebody
live there
life without believing in something, what kind
of life is that,
life is meant to be discovered, its one big mystery, and all the
science in the
world can still not prove how we exactly came to be?
But you should at least be honest and know that one who believes in the forensic
science of origins
of life has to have as much faith in the person asserting the theory as one has to have believing God was the witness to the event and told man kind how the
world came about in simplistic terms.
The International Information fundamentally represents the dominance and penetration
of the technocratic culture into the
life of the peoples in the third
World, either in the form
of science and technology transfer, or in the form
of economic development and coqercial advertisement, or in terms
of the inculcation
of military values such as national security doctrine and peace propagenda.
Science does explain all your questions, you just simply refuse to believe that evolution, over millions and billions
of years, could result in the wonderful
world we
live in.
Vannevar Bush, for example, a former president
of MIT and director
of the government's Office
of Scientific Research and Development during the war, published an influential article in the Atlantic Monthly which «offered an amazingly prescient view
of the effect
of science on the
world economy and
of computers in daily
life.»
But the fact
of the matter is that as powerful as
science is, it has a long way to go before it can offer anything nearly as complete and practical and useful to the subjective
lives of human beings as the teachings
of the various
world religions.
We must take pains to show that acceptance
of Jesus Christ as Lord does not carry with it the three - storey universe; that to be a Christian does not imply that one believes that God is the immediate cause
of all that happens, however true it may be that he is «first» and «final» cause; and that the findings
of modem
science as to how God in fact works in the
world only illuminate the central truth that in Christ he has worked with a singular intensity and (as we might say) directness to bring to men wholeness
of life.
The indeterminacy that
science has found at the levels
of matter (uncertainty),
life (chance mutations), and human existence (freedom) are essential cosmological ingredients if the autonomy
of the
world is not to collapse into the being
of the Creator - God (in which case it would no longer be a
world distinct unto itself).
We have to begin to realize that laws and codes
of conduct handed down in a time before
science, before understanding biology and evolution, before our
world was so grossly overpopulated, should no longer govern our
lives, even if we otherwise subscribe to the faith.
But in the modern
world several
sciences have converged to press home to us the rational conclusion that each individual man is a psychosomatic unity, a
living physical organism whose various organs, both physical and psychical, can only function as part
of the total organism.
1) Evidence
of God in
Science & Math: Reading some
of the
worlds leading cosmologists (Hawking, Dawkins, Ross, Behe), etc., they make long and interesting claims
of the intricacy
of the universe and the balance
of the natural elements and gravitational forces necessary for
life to exist on this planet.
So, for instance, with the discovery
of the New
World and the rush
of Catholic missions to far - flung lands, many Catholics understood that they were
living in a new era
of exploration, industry, education, art, literature, devotion,
science, and philosophy.
We
live in a
world rightly fascinated by the mysteries
of the universe and
of science, and what we learn over and over again is how small and fragile we really are.
As a christian and one who has
lived in the
world of science all my working
life the answer is that God was the orgin
of life that started in a way that is still largly unknown to both the religious and scientific communities.
You're
living in a fantasy
world Jason and you're completely ignorant
of science.
With that in mind, I generally discount all
of the
science and knowledge that has been developed throughout human history as being useful for
living in the
world we understand, but not truth by any means.
In other words, they have neither gone the way
of experience - rich evangelicalism, nor have they offered an experience that relates honestly to people informed by
science and a humanistic
world - view in their own
lives.
In one sense the discovery
of human individuality was necessary for the development
of human rights, the economic individualism orientated to profit and free market produced the modern economy; the separation
of human being from nature coupled with the autonomy
of the
world of science helped the development
of technology; and the autonomy
of different areas
of life like the arts and the government, each to follow purposes and laws inherent in it, did make for unfettered creativity in the various fields.
Strangely enough, those groups which denied the importance
of the material side
of life, including Christian
Science, appealed largely to people who were richly blessed with the
world's goods.
We can not share in this mythological picture, continues Bultmann, because we
live and think within «the
world - picture formed by modern natural
science» and within «the understanding man has
of himself in accordance with which he understands himself to be a closed inner unity that does not stand open to the incursion
of supernatural powers.
Look at how «advanced» (lol) our
science is... we can create so much... re-engineer
life... on the verge
of being able to create
life... yet look at our
world... how un-civilized we are!
What actually happens with Gutiérez and others close to him is something like this: they turn to the social
sciences for help in understanding the dynamics
of the
world in which they
live; among those they read is Marx, who describes a
world in which a «class struggle» is going on.
how will religion explain pre-big bang, parralell
worlds the countless other scienctific possiblities
science will eventually locate... how about the discovery
of another intelligent
life form?
This directs attention to the concrete subjects doing
science or scholarship, as well as the
life -
worlds of everyday
living and the social institutions within which those subjects do
science and scholarship.
Just as
sciences, technologies and scholarly disciplines arise out
of and return to the
life -
worlds of everyday
living and dying, so the logical and theoretical methods
of argumentative discourse arise out
of and return to participatory «fusions
of horizon» in the «mutual agreements»
of historical narrative praxis (BOR 144ff, TW 113ff).
Beyond astronomy, the more one understands about the physical
sciences and the
world we
live on, the more you come to see that it is too dang perfect to be the result
of some random, godless cosmic event.
But as I hope my earlier analysis
of the scientific writing on
life extension made clear, there is no working picture or vision
of what our
lives, as individuals or
living in common, might actually be like in the
world that
science might bring about.
The liberal theology has never yet been given sufficient credit for having taken the new
science — the new
world view
of the nineteenth century, the conception
of growth and evolving
life — and trying to reconceive the nature
of God so as to make His relation to such a
world intelligible.
So far as I understand the matter, the conditions
of reasonableness in our situation are secular, even if not secularistic, conditions, i.e., they demand the unqualified acceptance both
of the method and
world - picture
of modern
science and critical history and
of the reality and significance
of this
world of time and change, which is the context
of our
lives as secular men.
The chapter headings give us an overview
of the work: Ignorance
of Scripture is ignorance
of Christ: the theological project
of Joseph Ratzinger; The critique
of criticism: beginning the search for a new theological synthesis; The hermeneutic
of faith: critical and historical foundations for a biblical theology; The spiritual
science of theology: its mission and method in the
life of the church; Reading God's testament to humankind: biblical realism, typology, and the inner unity
of revelation; The theology
of the divine economy: covenant, kingdom, and the history
of salvation; The embrace
of salvation: mystagogy and the transformation ofsacrifice; The cosmic liturgy: the Eucharistic kingdom and the
world as temple; The authority
of mystery: the beauty and necessity
of the theologian's task.
It may be called modernism, but surely one can
live in the modern
world, accepting its
science and engaging in its work, without falling into idolatry
of the modern.
It follows in the footsteps
of the very best
of the
science fiction genre in forcing us to ask uncomfortable questions about the
world we
live in.
Hitherto, in the eyes
of a
Science too much accustomed to reconstruct the
world on one spatial axis extending in a line from the infinitely small to the infinitely great, the larger molecules
of organic chemistry, and still more the
living cellular composites, have existed without any defined position, like wandering stars, in the general scheme
of cosmic elements.
Here and there it may be, we can catch a glimpse
of the wonderful order in nature, the regularity
of the stars, scattered over the wide spaces
of the universe yet obedient to one law; the order to be found even in the microscopic
world, as also within visible things concerning which
science has given such amazing information in recent years; the order in the construction
of a flower or
of an animal, from the flea to the whale, a noteworthy obedience to law even in the
life of man.
Heck without incest there wouldn't be anyone
living in the south and Chad wouldn't be here to share his simple visions
of science and the
world.
«
Science,» she writes, «is important for exactly the same reason that the study
of history or
of language is important — because we are beings that need in general to understand the
world in which we
live, and our culture has chosen a way
of life to which that understanding is central.»