You are showing
the world through this art form that you believe and praise God.
Lastly, I am hopeful your testimony is good for
our world through demonstrating that one can be deeply thoughtful, skeptical, and human and still have the power to elicit profound change.
All science is, is the philosophy of gaining knowledge about the material
world through observation and experimentation.
His art offers a lens to see
the world through the blunt, non-politically correct perspective of someone who's lived through his experiences.
Suddenly they find themselves surrounded by people with quite different priorities, who view
the world through much different lenses, and who care about different things.
He believes that world engineering students, freed from the obsolete slogans of yesterday and alert to the necessities of tomorrow, can help lead
the world through a scientific - design revolution.
Nevertheless, there are a great many faithful believers that struggle toward daily balance: the demands of responsibility in a capitalist society, seeking to hear God's voice, living in a seemingly self - sufficient world, vastly expanding that
world through belief in a spiritual reality.
We know that we experience
the world through the medium of our bodies.
You know, understanding
the world through observation and rational conclusion, rather than through believing everything that an old book of myths tells us.
In it, he not only includes the best explanation of mimetic theory I have read so far, but he then ties in the accompanying themes of the scapegoat mechanism, how Satan casts out Satan through violence, and how Jesus reveals all this to
the world through His ministry, life, death, and resurrection.
The struggles for economic justice, political freedom and cultural renewal are elements in the total liberation of
the world through the mission of Christ.
It is human nature.I would would have my own version of what happened if I was there.We all see
the world through different lenses.Same situation, different interpretation.
Many church leaders believed that the dream of saving
the world through democracy was simply a political way of expressing the mission of the church.
Hence, Hartshorne says that God has direct access to all parts of
the world through immediate social relations after the fashion of human minds» being immediately aware of the states of their brain cells.
If you know God then you see only the one true God and as you brought to my attention I then view
the world through that lens.
God speaks to
the world through its fullness and its roughness as well as from its particularity and its religious traditions.
Learn to scorn the praise of men, Learn to lose with God; Jesus won
the world through shame!
He can view
the world through our eyes as a close personal friend.
Performances in the confessional mode in a ritual context are «primarily concerned with identity and self - disclosure»; in the political (or ethical) mode performance «is oriented more toward affecting
the world through direct social and political action.»
Such listening is seeing
the world through another person's eyes.
And if this is a legitimate interpretation of the meaning of such statements, then there seems to be no irresolvable conflict between Hartshorne's metaphysical God and Karl Barth's triune God who is only known through his self - disclosure to
the world through Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit.
What is said by such statements as «Christ died for us,» or «God sent his son into the world that
the world through him might be saved,» or «God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself» can not be said otherwise.
While the state portrayed itself as a peace society that had exterminated the causes of war, capitalism and fascism and opposed NATO armaments, the church spoke of the priority of peace in personal and interpersonal life because God has reconciled
the world through Jesus Christ.
A Response to Responses») writes: «Today the uniqueness of Jesus can be found in his insistence that salvation or the Reign of God must be realised in
this world through human actions of love and justice, with a special concern for the victims of oppression or exploitation.»
The Bible teaches that God impressed his intelligibility onto
the world through creation by the Word.
The Qur» an is a purely divine work, a textual revelation which reached
the world through a heavenly Messenger, the Faithful Spirit, the Archangel Gabriel, who deposited it in the heart of Muhammad.
Some men in minority cultures are finding, as they move into the middle - class
world through job or profession, that friendship between women and men is possible and that a companionship marriage can be more satisfying than the one they have grown up with and married into.
As we look to the years ahead, we need to do so with discernment and hope about what God is doing in
the world through his churches.
These people would not allow any religion but Christianity to be seen in a good light if taught in classes in the USA, when history proves that, Christianity is the reason so many people in the USA have been motivated to lynch black people, make gays second class citizens, fought against woman being allowed to vote, hunted down and killed others from different denominations, force all other's to pay for their «work» whether in the USA or around
the world through tax exempt status, gifts or «Faith - based initiatives».
What matters is the world view which men imbibe from their environment, and it is science which determines that view of
the world through the school, the press, the wireless, the cinema, and all the other fruits of technical progress.)
1 Corinthians 1:21 For since in the wisdom of God
the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe.
Here is God's word to back me up: John 3:17: «God sent his Son into the world not to judge the world, but to save
the world through him.»
It's an opportunity to see people through a more personal lens — meeting them in their context and territory, seeing
the world through their eyes.
So the more we gaze into the heart of Christ, the more we will see
the world through his eyes.
... We can use
the world through technology because it is made in a rational manner.
In the development of Christian thought it has been stressed that the Spirit of God, while indeed the Spirit come from God the Father, is the Spirit who is mediated to
the world through the Son.
Through their maternity homes, they empower women and teenage mothers around
the world through partnerships and sustainable fair trade product development.
Rather, it can become a community of conviction, participation, personal relationships and discipline, in which men and women can reorient themselves to
the world through the rediscovery of its center in the gracious activity of God.
Luther in these instances was anticipating our contemporary biblical scholarship, which was a later German gift to the Christian
world through the Graf Welhausen School in the 19th century and through the work of Rudolf Bultmann in the 20th.
In the creation of
the world through long evolutionary processes, God has made man «in his own image» — that is, with spiritual qualities akin to those of God.
The difference lies mainly in the fact that the earlier exponents of the social gospel thought of the coming of the kingdom of God as progressive growth toward a better
world through the conquest of these social evils.
In short, Jesus not only practiced and taught and recommended peace, but in some profound way he brought about peace for us and for
the world through his death and resurrection.
Or, in the Revised Standard Version: «Therefore as sin came into
the world through one man and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all men sinned» (Romans 5:12).
It arises out of a particular stage of
the world through its «objectification» or nonconscious «prehension» of the systematically arrayed actualities in its past (PR 5lff / 81ff.)
I could go on, but the fact of the matter is, if you use just the bible to map out a timeline it's a little wonky but doable because for over 2000 years its had revisions and edits so that it would make more sense, if you want to really look the history of
the world through geology, ice core samples and what not, it'll paint a very different picture.
In other words, God saves
the world through the overwhelming power of rationality, rather than by force.
«For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that
the world through him might be saved» (John 3:17) The problem with the second view is that, again, God judges the world in righteousness.
All perceive
the world through their nationalistic eyes.
In his book Celebration of Discipline, Richard Foster writes, «We are to change
the world through prayer.»
That is what individuals DO N'T want, they don't want a rigid set of doctrine or beliefs; they want to feel connected to others and themselves and
the world through respect and compassion, not flog an ideology that tells them what to believe and how to act and on what basis to judge and often condemn others.