International tensions could peak, and with unpredictable leaders like Kim - Jong Un taunting
the world with nuclear weapons (which fall under the domain of Uranus), this energy could be volatile.
especially in
a world with nuclear weapons and religious politicians!!
Not exact matches
Looking to the success of the post Cold War - era, when the
world dismantled 90 % of its
nuclear weapons, Nunn and Lugar maintain that safe denuclearization can be achieved
with proper planning.
«I think the greatest threat to the
world and to our two countries, and to all countries, is the marriage of militant Islam
with nuclear weapons, and specifically the attempt of Iran to acquire
nuclear weapons.
Neytanyahu delivered a visual - heavy presentation Monday that claimed to prove Tehran secretly pursued developing
nuclear weapons, in a bid to undermine support for the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the 2015 agreement signed
with six major
world powers to curb its
nuclear program in exchange for economic sanctions relief.
These facts are consistent
with what the United States has long known: Iran had a robust, clandestine
nuclear weapons program that it has tried and failed to hide from the
world and from its own people.
These facts are consistent
with what the United States has long known: Iran had a robust, clandestine
nuclear weapons program that it has tried and failed to hide from the
world and from its own people,» the White House said in a statement.
As I wrote a couple of weeks ago, a war
with North Korea is the markets» biggest geopolitical black swan, because it would likely be cataclysmic,
with hundreds of thousands dead, the
world's fifth - largest metro area, Seoul, suffering massive destruction, and perhaps even
nuclear or chemical
weapons unleashed on Japan or U.S. bases in the region.
In the immediate context of The Challenge of Peace this conviction was focused specifically on the question of
nuclear weapons and whether they might ever be morally used; the United States bishops» answer was No, and in this they concurred
with a wide range of opponents of
nuclear weapons around the
world.
Thus we live now
with the fruits of the actions of early industrial capitalism,
nuclear weapons used in
World War II, the Green Revolution, widespread deforestation.
The search today for some minimal order under law must go on in the threatening
world of nations, some armed
with nuclear weapons, and others preparing to be so armed.
In recent years, as scholars have explored Ronald Reagan's foreign policy
with greater access to primary - source documents, something utterly baffling to the conventional wisdom of his time (and ours) has come into focus: Reagan, determined to win the Cold War, was also eager to rid the
world of
nuclear weapons.
Until the monster
weapons of the
nuclear powers are controlled by
world structures of peace and justice, mankind flirts daily
with extinction.
Since January of this year,
nuclear abolitionism — or at least the call for the intentional pursuit of the goal of a
world without
nuclear weapons — not only received honorable mention in President Obama's inaugural address, but was the centerpiece of two speeches (5 April in Prague; 24 September at the United Nations) and a joint statement
with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (1 April in London).
But when
world leaders
with nuclear weapons, as an extreme example, make serious global decisions because they believe their mythology to be history and their intuition to be the voice of the invisible man in the sky directing their actions — that makes me terrified!
This is not a political debate but the comment shocked me all the same.What War?Do you actually believe there will be a war
with a country
with Nuclear weapons and the
world will survive it?
Korea likely sees us for the hypocrites we are, thus, doesn't want to be told by the only people in the history of the
world to ever use
nuclear weapons, what to do
with theirs.
All three of the main political parties are stuck in a dangerous Cold War time warp, unable to see that the
world has changed and that modern security threats such as climate change and fundamentalism can't be tackled
with nuclear weapons.
By divesting the state from any business
with corporations who fuel Iran's terrorist activities and pursuit of
nuclear weapons, we are doing our part to make the
world a safer, more secure place.
It would suggest to allies and enemies the
world over that use of
nuclear weapons is acceptable, and they might set their own parameters for using such
weapons, which could be at odds
with our own parameters.
Shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn yesterday rebuked the Labour leader over Trident
with a warning no one wants to live in a
world where only North Korea has
nuclear weapons.
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R - Willsboro), a long - time critic of the agreement, agreed
with the White House's decision, calling the deal a «deeply flawed agreement that provided the
world's largest state sponsor of terror
with billions of dollars while failing to stop their path to
nuclear weapons capability, and failing to address Iran's ballistic missile program.»
Most of the
world's countries have agreed a treaty to ban
nuclear weapons, but
with the
nuclear powers boycotting it, will it make a difference?
It's a busy time for
nuclear - policy analysts: Just days after President Obama told a crowd of 20,000 in Prague that the U.S. had a «moral responsibility» to take the lead in ridding the
world of
nuclear weapons, two groups have come forward
with their own blueprints for doing so.
Iran's attempt to develop
nuclear weapons will not be the last challenge faced in a journey that began
with the
world's first fission bomb test during World W
world's first fission bomb test during
World W
World War II
Personally, I agree
with getting rid of the
world's
nuclear weapons, but I think the United States should be last.
The Manhattan Project refers to the effort to develop the first
nuclear weapons during
World War II by the United States
with assistance from the United Kingdom and Canada.
The
world's
nuclear enrichment programs should be under international control to prevent the development of
nuclear weapons after the new arms deal
with Iran expires in 10 to 15 years, said Frank von Hippel, a senior Princeton University research physicist and a former security advisor during the Clinton Administration.
Series creator Hideo Kojima has been making Metal Gear games
with publisher Konami for close to 30 years, creating sequels and prequels that bounce back and forth between the future and the past of a labyrinthine fictional
world of spies, cold wars and walking
nuclear weapons bearing the series» name.
Set against the backdrop of the early 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, The Man from U.N.C.L.E. centers on CIA agent Napoleon Solo (Henry Cavill) and KGB agent Illya Kuryakin (Armie Hammer), two foes forced to put aside their differences, to team up on a joint mission to stop a mysterious international criminal organization, bent on creating
nuclear weapons with the goal of
world domination.
Robert Duvall, Téa Leoni, Elijah Wood, Vanessa Redgrave and Maximilian Schell must reconcile
with the end of the
world when
nuclear weapons fail to deter the killer celestial body, actually splitting it in two.
For three decades the Metal Gear franchise has been more - or-less a «tactical espionage action» game — in the narrative a «deep state» government is creating walking bipedal tanks armed
with nuclear weapons, and a soldier from a core group of familiar characters must sneak and infiltrate the enemy base in order to save the
world from annihilation.
The stage is already set as we find out from a torn newspaper clipping that the
world has been hit
with nuclear weapons and it is the «End of Mankind» as the headline reads.
The plot, in case anyone's forgotten, concerns the recruitment of legendary soldier Solid Snake; forced out of retirement to confront a terrorist organisation who have made threats to the US government and are holding the
world at ransom
with the threat of a
nuclear weapon.
LONDON, 26 January, 2018 — The Doomsday Clock, which judges the threat to
world peace and the environment, has advanced significantly,
with nuclear weapons and climate change held largely responsible.
If the problem is
nuclear weapons, beyond supporting the new
nuclear ban treaty, what can the
world do to eliminate
nuclear weapons everywhere, starting
with these actually existing
weapons?
Muller and Andrews find themselves between two extremes: the imperialist «let the third
world chew on humanitarian intervention» (small smart wars, drones, renditions, Gitmo, NATO humanitarian intervention — third
world has noticed the difference North Korea, India, Pakistan, (not Israel) have developed
nuclear weapons — Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria have not) and the autarchical / regional conglemerations
with no participation or involvement from the imperialist countries.