Sentences with phrase «world with nuclear weapons»

International tensions could peak, and with unpredictable leaders like Kim - Jong Un taunting the world with nuclear weapons (which fall under the domain of Uranus), this energy could be volatile.
especially in a world with nuclear weapons and religious politicians!!

Not exact matches

Looking to the success of the post Cold War - era, when the world dismantled 90 % of its nuclear weapons, Nunn and Lugar maintain that safe denuclearization can be achieved with proper planning.
«I think the greatest threat to the world and to our two countries, and to all countries, is the marriage of militant Islam with nuclear weapons, and specifically the attempt of Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.
Neytanyahu delivered a visual - heavy presentation Monday that claimed to prove Tehran secretly pursued developing nuclear weapons, in a bid to undermine support for the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the 2015 agreement signed with six major world powers to curb its nuclear program in exchange for economic sanctions relief.
These facts are consistent with what the United States has long known: Iran had a robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program that it has tried and failed to hide from the world and from its own people.
These facts are consistent with what the United States has long known: Iran had a robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program that it has tried and failed to hide from the world and from its own people,» the White House said in a statement.
As I wrote a couple of weeks ago, a war with North Korea is the markets» biggest geopolitical black swan, because it would likely be cataclysmic, with hundreds of thousands dead, the world's fifth - largest metro area, Seoul, suffering massive destruction, and perhaps even nuclear or chemical weapons unleashed on Japan or U.S. bases in the region.
In the immediate context of The Challenge of Peace this conviction was focused specifically on the question of nuclear weapons and whether they might ever be morally used; the United States bishops» answer was No, and in this they concurred with a wide range of opponents of nuclear weapons around the world.
Thus we live now with the fruits of the actions of early industrial capitalism, nuclear weapons used in World War II, the Green Revolution, widespread deforestation.
The search today for some minimal order under law must go on in the threatening world of nations, some armed with nuclear weapons, and others preparing to be so armed.
In recent years, as scholars have explored Ronald Reagan's foreign policy with greater access to primary - source documents, something utterly baffling to the conventional wisdom of his time (and ours) has come into focus: Reagan, determined to win the Cold War, was also eager to rid the world of nuclear weapons.
Until the monster weapons of the nuclear powers are controlled by world structures of peace and justice, mankind flirts daily with extinction.
Since January of this year, nuclear abolitionism — or at least the call for the intentional pursuit of the goal of a world without nuclear weapons — not only received honorable mention in President Obama's inaugural address, but was the centerpiece of two speeches (5 April in Prague; 24 September at the United Nations) and a joint statement with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (1 April in London).
But when world leaders with nuclear weapons, as an extreme example, make serious global decisions because they believe their mythology to be history and their intuition to be the voice of the invisible man in the sky directing their actions — that makes me terrified!
This is not a political debate but the comment shocked me all the same.What War?Do you actually believe there will be a war with a country with Nuclear weapons and the world will survive it?
Korea likely sees us for the hypocrites we are, thus, doesn't want to be told by the only people in the history of the world to ever use nuclear weapons, what to do with theirs.
All three of the main political parties are stuck in a dangerous Cold War time warp, unable to see that the world has changed and that modern security threats such as climate change and fundamentalism can't be tackled with nuclear weapons.
By divesting the state from any business with corporations who fuel Iran's terrorist activities and pursuit of nuclear weapons, we are doing our part to make the world a safer, more secure place.
It would suggest to allies and enemies the world over that use of nuclear weapons is acceptable, and they might set their own parameters for using such weapons, which could be at odds with our own parameters.
Shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn yesterday rebuked the Labour leader over Trident with a warning no one wants to live in a world where only North Korea has nuclear weapons.
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R - Willsboro), a long - time critic of the agreement, agreed with the White House's decision, calling the deal a «deeply flawed agreement that provided the world's largest state sponsor of terror with billions of dollars while failing to stop their path to nuclear weapons capability, and failing to address Iran's ballistic missile program.»
Most of the world's countries have agreed a treaty to ban nuclear weapons, but with the nuclear powers boycotting it, will it make a difference?
It's a busy time for nuclear - policy analysts: Just days after President Obama told a crowd of 20,000 in Prague that the U.S. had a «moral responsibility» to take the lead in ridding the world of nuclear weapons, two groups have come forward with their own blueprints for doing so.
Iran's attempt to develop nuclear weapons will not be the last challenge faced in a journey that began with the world's first fission bomb test during World Wworld's first fission bomb test during World WWorld War II
Personally, I agree with getting rid of the world's nuclear weapons, but I think the United States should be last.
The Manhattan Project refers to the effort to develop the first nuclear weapons during World War II by the United States with assistance from the United Kingdom and Canada.
The world's nuclear enrichment programs should be under international control to prevent the development of nuclear weapons after the new arms deal with Iran expires in 10 to 15 years, said Frank von Hippel, a senior Princeton University research physicist and a former security advisor during the Clinton Administration.
Series creator Hideo Kojima has been making Metal Gear games with publisher Konami for close to 30 years, creating sequels and prequels that bounce back and forth between the future and the past of a labyrinthine fictional world of spies, cold wars and walking nuclear weapons bearing the series» name.
Set against the backdrop of the early 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, The Man from U.N.C.L.E. centers on CIA agent Napoleon Solo (Henry Cavill) and KGB agent Illya Kuryakin (Armie Hammer), two foes forced to put aside their differences, to team up on a joint mission to stop a mysterious international criminal organization, bent on creating nuclear weapons with the goal of world domination.
Robert Duvall, Téa Leoni, Elijah Wood, Vanessa Redgrave and Maximilian Schell must reconcile with the end of the world when nuclear weapons fail to deter the killer celestial body, actually splitting it in two.
For three decades the Metal Gear franchise has been more - or-less a «tactical espionage action» game — in the narrative a «deep state» government is creating walking bipedal tanks armed with nuclear weapons, and a soldier from a core group of familiar characters must sneak and infiltrate the enemy base in order to save the world from annihilation.
The stage is already set as we find out from a torn newspaper clipping that the world has been hit with nuclear weapons and it is the «End of Mankind» as the headline reads.
The plot, in case anyone's forgotten, concerns the recruitment of legendary soldier Solid Snake; forced out of retirement to confront a terrorist organisation who have made threats to the US government and are holding the world at ransom with the threat of a nuclear weapon.
LONDON, 26 January, 2018 — The Doomsday Clock, which judges the threat to world peace and the environment, has advanced significantly, with nuclear weapons and climate change held largely responsible.
If the problem is nuclear weapons, beyond supporting the new nuclear ban treaty, what can the world do to eliminate nuclear weapons everywhere, starting with these actually existing weapons?
Muller and Andrews find themselves between two extremes: the imperialist «let the third world chew on humanitarian intervention» (small smart wars, drones, renditions, Gitmo, NATO humanitarian intervention — third world has noticed the difference North Korea, India, Pakistan, (not Israel) have developed nuclear weapons — Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria have not) and the autarchical / regional conglemerations with no participation or involvement from the imperialist countries.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z