Sentences with phrase «worried about coal»

I'm personally worried about coal prices spiking alongside oil like in 2008, but EIA estimates about 120 years worth or reserves which do not have the same recovery problems relating to oil.

In Harrodsburg, Kentucky, residents like Pamla Wood are worried about coal poisoning their water.

«People ask me why they should worry about coal fires and want me to give them some numbers and hard facts, but the reliable quantitative data are not there at the moment,» Prakash admits.

Gore was no dummy, he knows what he's doing telling people in Tennessee and Kentucky that they have no worries about coal.

Gore was no dummy, he knows what he's doing telling people in Tennessee and Kentucky that they have no worries about coal.

Not exact matches

As North American producers massively ramp up plans to export coal to Asia, B.C. figures large in their plans — and in opposition efforts of citizens worried about climate change.

Puerto Rico also has more contaminants to worry about thanks to the coal industry, which has been stockpiling coal ash in southern Puerto Rico.

«With a vegetable grill topper, the size of vegetables doesn't become a limiting factor and you don't have to worry about slices falling through the grate and into the coals,» she explains.

Many of the representatives at COP 22 are worried about a Trump presidency because he has called climate change a «hoax,» pledged to «cancel» the Paris agreement, repeal many of Pres. Barack Obama's climate initiatives and has promised to revive the U.S. coal industry.

FOR people worried about the feminising effect of oestrogen - like chemicals in the water there is now a modern - day equivalent of the canary in the coal mine: a genetically modified fish in a bowl.

It's more important and intelligent to fix the gut when it comes to the immune system than to worry about rubbing coal tar on a person with psoriasis or treating a patient with rheumatoid arthritis with steroids to reduce their inflammation.

The bill aims to thread various needles, for instance including measures to encourage a shift from coal and oil to natural gas (which produces roughly half the emissions per unit of energy) but in ways that won't alarm environmentalists worried about impacts of expanded gas drilling.

Environmentalists will rejoice at this, but the trend is so swift that owners and operators of electric power systems are legitimately worrying about whether the decline of coal will undermine reliability of the electric grid and also make the nation too dependent on natural gas.

* The government insists that dealing with global warming is way down the priority list and since our economy is booming because of mineral exports (including heaps of coal don't you know) we should concentrate on that and not get too worried about the water situation.

If industry - generated aerosols have a more limited cooling effect than originally thought, we can clean up and scale down dirty coal plants without worrying too much about consequent sudden jumps in global temperatures of up to 2 degrees C (if I remember the upper limits of earlier studies correctly).

See also::: Cats More Lethal to Birds Than Wind Turbines,:: America Celebrates Endangered Species Day,:: Coal State Rep Worried About Bats and Birds,:: Common Eco-Myth: Wind Turbines Kill Birds

So from the start it seems safe to concede that coal is under attack, but it isn't clear that it is an Obama War on Coal that the industry should be most worried abcoal is under attack, but it isn't clear that it is an Obama War on Coal that the industry should be most worried abCoal that the industry should be most worried about.

Sounds to me like Big Oil and Big Coal have nothing to worry about.

I've generally been more worried about the GCF supporting natural gas than I have been about coal, but now I feel slightly less confident.

seems river deltas have more to worry about from «green» hydro power than coal or oil.

Is this to say developing nations shouldn't worry about CO2 emissions, and that western nations can not point their fingers at them and say «hey, why should we cut our CO2 emissions when they are building their THIRD coal plant?»

There is no worry about that now, Ott said, even with the announced closure of several coal and nuclear plants, including two FirstEnergy plants in Ohio and another in Pennsylvania.

Waller said the dip in Teck's stock price is likely related to a plunge in the entire mining sector Tuesday, rather than the explosion and investor worry about halted coal production from Greenhills.

While coal supporters worried about how this could impact future projects, some environmentalists thought Ecology's decision would actually send a positive message to other companies.

Operating cost for electric cars is $ 0.50 to $ 0.75 per mile versus $ 0.10 for gasoline powered cars once battery replacement costs are included By 2020, Chinese PER CAPITA emissions will be higher than America's Does not believe that the 0.6 degree temperature rise to date is the West's «fault,» but does believe that China is the future problem Whatever U.S. does about emissions reduction and what people do as individuals is totally trivial in face of the fact that China is adding huge amounts of coal fired generating capacity The most meaningful emissions reduction strategy today would be to convert China from coal to natural gas The claim that there are more frequent or more intense hurricanes and tornadoes as a result of AGW is not scientifically supported We can reduce emissions, but it is important that we do the RIGHT things (and NOT the WRONG ones) Not worried about «peak oil;» coal can be converted to liquid fuel

If regulators worry about the state of the global economy, they may ease up on regulations - good news if you are burning coal, bad news for Camco and EcoSecurities.

Carbon capture, though, has attracted opposition from people who oppose coal mining, itself environmentally damaging, and others who worry about injecting carbon dioxide deep below the earth's surface.

Conversely, a PacifiCorp spokesperson told the Los Angeles Times consumers shouldn't worry about the utility's coal heavy portfolio, saying the additonal renewable energy will help California's clean energy goals.

Meanwhile it gets used to soften the impact of the idea of new build coal, everyone talks about capturing the carbon and there's nothing to worry about.

But for coal producers, there is absolutely zero benefit for customers to worry about CO2....

For those who worry about CO2 emissions, CO2 emissions from ultra-supercritical coal - fired plants are nearly the same as from NGCC plants.

The world is still warming as a result of coal burned in power stations that closed decades ago, and no one suggests that we should not worry about this.

Note that coal exports would also help lower the trade deficit, which groups like CAP seem worried about.

Concrete makers in Virginia say Dominion Energy doesn't need to worry about running out of customers for its 30 million tons of waste coal ash.

Does that mean continue flying, don't worry about changing light bulbs, don't worry about trying to capture carbon or shutting down coal - fired power stations?

In Oregon, for example, Governor Kate Brown signed a bill that will move the state to 50 percent renewable energy production by 2040 and end the state's use of coal power by 2030; in Montana, sagging demand and economic pressures caused Arch Coal to scrap its plans for a massive strip - mining operation on federal land; and in a recent Gallup poll, 64 percent of Americans said they worried a «great deal» or «fair amount» about global warming, up from 55 percent only a year coal power by 2030; in Montana, sagging demand and economic pressures caused Arch Coal to scrap its plans for a massive strip - mining operation on federal land; and in a recent Gallup poll, 64 percent of Americans said they worried a «great deal» or «fair amount» about global warming, up from 55 percent only a year Coal to scrap its plans for a massive strip - mining operation on federal land; and in a recent Gallup poll, 64 percent of Americans said they worried a «great deal» or «fair amount» about global warming, up from 55 percent only a year ago.

I think that if you have solar energy, the most effective thing is probably to add it to the grid and avoid using coal and / or natural gas to generate electric power and now you do not have the CO2 to worry about.

I'm a very risk - averse person and I worry much more about the planetary life support system than the bottom line of the coal industry.

Economy vs. Environment: We've Heard This Before The debate that has surfaced in Nunavut is not unlike ongoing debates elsewhere regarding the development of coal, oil, and natural gas: Some Inuit argue in favor of the economic development that would result from mining, while others worry about the environmental consequences.

And now, as supposedly seriously worried people about the health of our climate, explain the «Critics on Wind Power» how you want to supply the other 96 % (408.000.000.000.000.000 BTU) of energy to the world without the extremely expensive and difficult technology for burning coal in a clean way.

Global warming was a big turn - off factor for coal - but even more people were worried about how coal - plants lowered the quality of the local environment.

That growth in coal consumption was the primary driver of the record levels of global carbon dioxide emissions in 2011, causing a leading energy economist to worry that «the door to a 2 °C trajectory is about to close.»

It is staying ahead mostly by building hydro, and in the tropics that releases a lot of methane (and displaces people and destroys habitats), in some cases so much that it's «dirtier» than coal, so being renewable isn't much of a plus if you're worried about GHG emissions.

It is quality will last years and do not have to worry about guests pouring hot coals in the garbage or in the woods.