Sentences with phrase «worries than warm»

Because sunlight is needed to form ozone, and the reaction is more vigorous at higher temperatures, cold, cloudy cities have fewer worries than warm, sunny ones.

Not exact matches

I would love to move to a state with enough land and a warmer climate for my sons to ride their race bikes, my daughter to have the horse she dreams of and me to finally be at peace, I also believe that there should be someone home with the kids no matter what their ages are and as a single Mom with no family support or father involvement being at home for me is even more important, especially now that they are teenagers, There are no more nap times or time outs and the things you worry about during this age are so much more dangerous than falling down and hitting their heads as toddlers.

The risks associated with future toxic waste from the oil sands are, in some ways, more worrying than the much more widely known global warming ones.

i was always worried the warm butter would affect the combination rather than having it chilled or at room temp.

Since it doesn't emit warm mist, it's far safer than warm mist devices, meaning you can run it all night without having to worry about it running dry or your infant potentially burning themselves.

They are much more worried about terror than global warming.

Not to worry though, because what chance is there that our scientific study results could even be related to foreign relations, other than, you know, research on global warming or acid rain or fish populations or avian - flu transmission or mad - cow - disease transmission, or ozone depletion or....

Poblano peppers are so great because they are more warm than spicy; my less adventurous guests didn't have to worry about breathing fire.

I never felt so grateful for my body, for my big hips, my cellulite, my frizzy hair, my long gangly toes, and all the idiosyncrasies that make me unique, than when I watched dozens of women afflicted with cancer, most now living without one or both of their breasts, practice yoga without any sense of comparison or competition, without trepidation or worry, or when I received the warmest hugs from these women, without a shred if insecurity or inhibition.

Don't worry: Your body will quickly condition itself to the exercises, and when you're done, you'll feel warmed up, rather than worn down.

Also, as far as outerwear, I had a winter baby and was worried I would need a warm coat but we ended up having a milder than usual winter and I was running so hot from being so pregnant that I didn't need any coat to button, or really any coat, period.

You don't have to worry about nylons, that the skirt will raise when you sit down and show more of your legs than you would like, they are much warmer on cold weather, plus you don't have to wear heels unless you want it because everyone knows that a skirt without heels is dull.

PRESS RELEASE — May 31 — A survey released today by PARSHIP.co.uk, a UK scientific online dating service, proves that loneliness is the biggest cause of stress for singles, with more sleepless nights being caused by worry about solo status than by credit card debt, work pressures and global warming.

What better way to melt your worries away than to lose yourself in the warm climes and immersive culture of a European city?

While I'm posting (I can see how you guys get into this) I'm also very uncomfortable with your notion of «tacit knowledge:» it certainly seems to be tacit knowledge in the blogosphere that the chances of the climate sensitivity (equilibrium warming on indefinite stabilization at 560ppm CO2, for the non-enthusiasts) being greater than or equal to 6 degrees are too small to be worth worrying about (meaning down at the level of an asteroid strike).

(Don't worry about a conflict of interest here; the book, Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast, has been out of print for more than a decade).

[Response: I assume that by your «we're doomed» statement you are saying you worry that in the event it is not warmer in 2001 - 2010 than 1990 - 2000, that this will damage our ability to get the word out.

If you were in a situation where there was initially more precipitation than radiative cooling could handle, then the atmosphere could just warm up until the radiative cooling increased — though then you'd have to worry about how much the warming affects precipitation, etc..

Don't worry, there is more than talking going on from the Global Warming debate.

Artic climatologists are worried that the knee of the curve has already been reached on global warming reaching the positive - feedback stage because the ice loss this year was so dramatically greater than the trend of previous years.

Apart from these last concerns, the WAIS is much less worrying than the GIS, because the huge thermal inertia and albedo effect of the EAIS, the antarctic continent itself, and the large amount of antarctic sea ice in the southern winter, all act to reduce the degree of warming for the WAIS (whereas the GIS is the victim of various unfortunate circumstances which amplify warming there).

No global warming alarmism needed, nothing to worry about unless you own beachfront property, and even then, a tsunami is a much bigger threat than sea level rise.

There is, in fact, little more evidence of worry about global warming now than there was when this question was first asked in 1989.

The fact that a majority of Americans don't believe global warming will pose a threat to them in their lifetimes makes it perhaps less surprising to find that significantly less than a majority of Americans say they worry a great deal about it.

Although there have been fluctuations on this measure of worry over the years, the percentage of Americans who worry a great deal about global warming is no higher now than it was 19 years ago.

Despite the enormous attention paid to global warming over the past several years, the average American is in some ways no more worried about it than in years past.

However, since more Americans express little to no worry about global warming than say this about extinction, global warming is clearly the environmental issue of least concern to them.

Americans are less worried about global warming in 2015 than they were in 2014, when 34 percent said they worried about warming a «great deal.»

And I'm worried that if governments keep saying what they're doing is organized at stopping warming at 2 - degrees, then the people who are actually on the front lines of climate change — coastal cities, farmers and so on — are going to think about preparing for a world that's 2 degrees warmer, when in reality the evidence seem to suggest they should be preparing for a world that [has warmed] a lot more than 2 degrees.

Here is an example of what I'm getting at: * Climate change is a myth or conspiracy - The temperature record is phony - the consensus is just politics * Climate change is unproven - The models are wrong - One hundred years isn't enough evidence * It's not our fault - Volcano's emit way more CO2 - It could be natural variation * A warmer climate is nothing to worry about - It was warmer in the middle ages - A warmer climate is a good thing * Mitigation will destroy the economy - We don't know enough to act - Reducing fossil fuel will destroy us * It's too late or someone else's problem - Kyoto is too little too late - The US absorbs more CO2 than it emits This is very rough example, but if you think it is headed in the right direction, I'd be happy to go through your guide in more detail and come up with something concrete - just give me the word.

Mankind needs to worry much more about UHi than it does (possible) fractional warming caused by CO2.

-LSB-...] you can accept all the basic tenets of greenhouse physics and still conclude that the threat of a dangerously large warming is so improbable as to be negligible, while the threat of real harm from climate - mitigation policies is already so high as to be worrying, that the cure is proving far worse than the disease is ever likely to be,» Ridley said in the 2011 Angus Millar speech on «Scientific Heresy,» reposted in its entirety at the skeptical blog Watts Up With That.

He says that rather than global warming we should be worrying about stratospheric cooling and the resultant loss of ozone which he categorises as disastrous.

The thermal expansion coefficient of water is very temperature dependent; warm water expands a lot more than cold for a given heat input, so this is very worrying and a double whammy so to speak.

If we had said to Hanson in 1988 come back in 2008 (ie the thirty years alarmists say is necessary to confirm a trend) we could now have patted him on the head and said «Don't worry Jim satellite data shows that it is no warmer now than when you raised the matter in 1988!»

A new study raised worry over finding that the last time ocean temperatures were this warm, or 125,000 years ago, sea levels were up to 30 feet higher than they currently are.

A large and determined fraction of the public were convinced that global warming worries deserved only scorn, and most of the rest gave the problem a far lower priority than the economic and political issues of the moment.

Only during the short periods around noon on sunny days — when the skin layer is warmer than the water below — is there any point in worrying about how long energy from DLR remains in the skin layer and what fraction is lost upward rather than downwards (warming the ocean).

Politics remain a powerful predictor of Americans» worries about global warming, with more than half of Democrats saying they worry about it a great deal, compared with 29 % of independents and 16 % of Republicans.

Seems to me many people who have little knowledge of climate science or substantive knowledge of actual impacts of warming (like the medical doctors worried about asthma) adopt as a default position to «do no harm»... IOW no matter the plausibility of the claimed harm, better to take whatever steps are suggested than to be possibly responsible for harm.

I am much more worried about cooling than warming.

However, the extent to which Americans take global warming seriously and worry about it differs markedly by age, with adults under age 35 typically much more engaged with the problem than those 55 and older.

If human CO2 does actually have something to due with increasing the rate of global warming, whatever scientific evidence you wish to choose shows that the puny amount we add, (less GHG than what termites emit), not only doesn't amount to anything worth worrying about at all — it is so small that it is IMPOSSIBLE to have an effect worth worrying about.

If that is your argument then there is surely nothing to worry about as no climate model has ever predicted that winter will become warmer than summer.

Not only do I worry about lives that may be lost to GW, but also about all those souls who will end up in a lot hotter place than a globally warmed world, because they refuse to mitigate GW.

Based on survey data gathered between 2008 and 2014, people living in the central US tended to be less worried about global warming than the national average, while residents of drought - stricken California showed noticeably more concern.