Sentences with phrase «worry about most of the time»

Whatever the reason, it's nothing to worry about most of the time.

That makes it a pretty easy stock to not worry about most of the time.

The voice acting is also quite good, and really causes the player to feel like they're invested in the well - being of the main character, as well as the supporting cast, even though you're worrying about yourself most of the time.

Malwarebytes is designed to run alongside a normal antivirus program so you shouldn't have to worry about this most of the time — especially if you're just using the free version.

Not exact matches

Taylor explains: «When times are tough, you've got fewer new customers coming into the market, so you have to worry more about holding the loyalty of your most valuable customers.

Most of them even have deals available for first - time customers, in case you're worried about committing to one of these.

And that is what I spend most of my time worrying about now: We were the disrupter.

Most of the stocks in this sector are trading at fair value or slightly above — the sector is trading between 14 and 18 times earnings — but Ronan says not to worry about the pricier P / E.

Most of the time as a homeowner, you won't face any spikes in your payment (adjustable - rate mortgages are one exception), and you won't have to worry about being tossed out on the street if your payment becomes too expensive.

Perhaps you're thinking that if you simply do short - term trading stocks and ETFs with the most relative strength to the major indices, there's not much of a concern to worry about market timing because these stocks will outperform.

It can be difficult to have the correct perspective when you are following the markets on a daily basis, but most average investors don't have to worry about this type of lump - sum, point - in - time investment performance.

I think most entrepreneurs, rather than making a mistake in picking a niche, make a mistake in «playing at business» — getting business cards, spending tons of time on optimizing their website, etc — before they need to worry about any of that.

These include being frequently interrupted or talked over; having decision - makers primarily address your male colleagues, even if they're junior to you; working harder to receive the same recognition as your male peers; having your ideas ignored unless they're rephrased by your male colleagues; worrying so much about being either «too nice» or «sharp elbowed» that it hurts your ability to be effective; frequently being asked how you manage your work - life balance; and perhaps most difficult of all, not having peers who have been through similar situations to support you during tough times.

If people spent as much time in God's Word as they did worrying about what God «told them», most of this confusion would disappear.

And yet, in America, most folks own at least two cars and spend a good deal of time worrying about getting fat.

Billy Graham is one of the most spiritual men of our time... I do nt think you will have to worry about beng there when all things come to pass... i do nt think you will be in the same place... I commend him for supporting Chic fil a they have a right to stand by what they believe... they are not saying they will discrimnate or hate gays they just do nt support them..

Most of the people that you admire because of their success are not spending time worrying about what everyone else is doing.

Like most European church leaders at the time, Pius XII worried about the threat of communism and viewed himself as a mediator for peace.

Advocates of these diets claim that you don't need to worry about calories as much when you're eating whole food sources, and most of the time they're right.

Bout time some of our fans stopped worrying about trying to look like the most «loyal» fan and started demanding real change.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

i know there is not much to write about but people try to find some kind of» story» when there is none, national managers don, t think about the players clubs they, ll play their best players if they are available not worrying if they have a game soon afterwards they already don, t have enough time with their players so have to make most of it, i believe wenger is managing giroud, getting him fit, fresh in view of a long season and is doing it while he has most of the squad fit im sure we will reap the rewards with giroud not having a spell of 10 games without scoring.

From my point of view I have not spent too many moments in the last 18 years worrying about our ability to score — spent most of the time fretting about conceding so I am not concerned or worried about our strike options of Giroud / Welbeck / Sanchez / Walcott and Podolski.

I have also heard multiple times that people are worried about his competition level, when Boise State had a tougher strength of schedule than most of the Big 12 teams, Arizona, Virginia, Tennessee....

Most of the time, the marks left by diapers aren't really anything to worry about and don't actually bother your baby.

Even though most parents don't seem to be worried about their own screen time, most of them are worried about their child's electronics use.

It also, in most cases, leaves you plenty of time to worry about the giant hole in your family finances... [Read more...]

I was so worried about this but most of the time the disposable liner didn't stay where I wanted it and the meconium got on the diaper anyway.

Most moms find their parenting stride eventually, creating a balance over the things they worry about and the times they let go of all the what ifs and just enjoy watching their little one grow.

Many women worry about low milk supply, but most of the time, there is nothing to worry about.

As far as I can see, the whole NCB thing is just sugar coating for «suck it up ladies, the pain won't kill you and most of the time you and the baby will survive, so you don't need to worry about it, stop being so entitled and just have your baby in your living room already».

Even though most babies develop healthily and at their own pace, it's quite normal for parents to worry from time to time about their baby's acquisition of mental and physical skills.

Don't worry about causing too much strain on your neck or shoulders either because most on the time these types of bags are fitted with some sort of comfort padding to protect your skin and muscles.

Swaddling is an old - time technique for comforting infants, and it doesn't present the risk of overheating which most new parents worry about.

Originally published on Mother's Guide to Sanity Most parents spend an abundant amount of time worrying about what goes into their baby without realizing the great value of observing the substance that comes out.

What I like specifically is that the foot lining is not long like on most of these buggies I won't need to worry about keeping feet and shoes clean all the time.

Infants spend most of their time sleeping, but you should not always be worried about their safety if you follow the following valuable tips.

Your baby will spend a lot of time sleeping on his or her back while sleeping at night, and it is also a time where the baby is subject to the risk of SIDS, so this is probably the most important time to worry about.

Remember, most children worry about something at one time or another — and not only is it perfectly normal, but a child who exhibits sensitivity may even be more aware of the world around them.

Most of our customers are still in that season of life where we're worried about the transition from crib to toddler bed, and of course railings are a necessity at that time!

It also, in most cases, leaves you plenty of time to worry about the giant hole in your family finances maternity leave brings.

«I have to say most members of the public, 99 % of the time are very pleasant to me when they stop me on public transport all over the country - but you do worry about your public safety.

Most importantly — in an age when voters worry about the believability of politicians» promises — it's deliverable» — The Times (#)

This, said Clemmons, is because «what matters most to businesses are bottom - line results, whereas in academia, a lot of folks still spend precious time worrying about whether or not minorities are intellectually inferior, when in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.»

My research indicates that the Siberian peat moss, Arctic tundra, and methal hydrates (frozen methane at the bottom of the ocean) all have an excellent chance of melting and releasing their stored co2.Recent methane concentration figures also hit the news last week, and methane has increased after a long time being steady.The forests of north america are drying out and are very susceptible to massive insect infestations and wildfires, and the massive die offs - 25 % of total forests, have begun.And, the most recent stories on the Amazon forecast that with the change in rainfall patterns one third of the Amazon will dry and turn to grassland, thereby creating a domino cascade effect for the rest of the Amazon.With co2 levels risng faster now that the oceans have reached carrying capacity, the oceans having become also more acidic, and the looming threat of a North Atlanic current shutdown (note the recent terrible news on salinity upwelling levels off Greenland,) and the change in cold water upwellings, leading to far less biomass for the fish to feed upon, all lead to the conclusion we may not have to worry about NASA completing its inventory of near earth objects greater than 140 meters across by 2026 (Recent Benjamin Dean astronomy lecture here in San Francisco).

A rapid, fluttering heartbeat is scary, for sure, but most of the time, palpitations are nothing to worry about.

In addition, most of the time, we worry about uncontrollable things, which we try to control leading us into a loop.

Most people, most of the time, don't need to worry about what particular muscle is being used; your nervous system typically takes care of that quite efficiently without conscious thought, and more often than not, focusing on the movement itself is more beneficial than focusing on individual muscMost people, most of the time, don't need to worry about what particular muscle is being used; your nervous system typically takes care of that quite efficiently without conscious thought, and more often than not, focusing on the movement itself is more beneficial than focusing on individual muscmost of the time, don't need to worry about what particular muscle is being used; your nervous system typically takes care of that quite efficiently without conscious thought, and more often than not, focusing on the movement itself is more beneficial than focusing on individual muscles.

That said, my personal opinion is that unless you're doing intense cardio for long periods of time (45 — 60 minutes or longer) every single day, most people don't need to worry about catabolizing muscle — provided they also do strength training a few times a week and eat right every day — i.e. get an adequate supply of macronutrients (protein, carbs, fats) and micronutrients.

This is something that happens most of the time, so you do not have to worry about it so much.