Sentences with phrase «worry about the defence»

I am not worried about our defence at all.

Less worried about defence holding will be a quality player with more game time and kolasanic will add real strength... So with kos and mustafi and Monreal seems to me we could let Gabriel go

The Gunners have already kept three clean sheets from six games, including the Community Shield and were unlucky with that equaliser from Leicester because of the injury to Koscielny, while Everton's second should not have stood for two reasons, so with all the players up to match sharpness, I am not too worried about the defence.

i'm only worried about our defence bro

Worry about the defence and team WHEN he has gone.

I don't understand why everyone is so worried about our defence, CB's don't need to be rotated at all often and Chambers has shown he can play there quite comfortably.

Not having to worry about your defence fills attacking players with the confidence to play freely and go forward.

With the new formation, I am not so worried about the defence now.

Not exact matches

The reason that people get worried about Per is that he can't run after Sturridge, or Aguero, or any one fast, but I'll tell you this; If your sweeper at any club whatsoever ends up chasing strikers so many times that it becomes notable, then there is something wrong with your defence.

That way the Man City defence will not be able to focus on one flank and not worry about pace down the left.

Its only our defence that I'm worried about.

It's not the defence we should be worried about after all they won us the most points in England last yea.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

With this attacking force, you won't have to worry to much about our defence???

We should all be still worried about that disorganised defence.

With either Alexis Sanchez or Joel Campbell on the other flank and with Mesut Ozil pulling the strings, the Liverpool defence and especially their full backs will have their hands full and will have all sorts of problems, and that should allow our own full backs to get forward and give them even more to worry about.

I have no worry about Liverpool n City their weakness in defence ll always mean Arsenal ll still top them but Chelsea however, they top us with 9points which is huge n the big question isn't if Chelsea ll drop points, cos they ll, they cnt go on 32games - winning streak, but will Arsenal capitalize on the dropped points n if they manage to won't they also still drop points at decisive points.

Mate move on... Walcott had a couple of decent crosses all game rest of time just a waste of a player... What makes me laugh is the talk of defences fearing his pace... They don't as he doesn't actually pose a goal threat which is what defenders really worry about....

In come Jack Wilshere, Walcott and Giroud and we also have the combative Coquelin in the holding midfield position so the young Gunners in the team can express themselves without worrying too much about leaving the defence exposed.

But with our top players available and the defence only needing to worry about Adebayor or Soldado, then I really can't see this being any less than a massacre in Arsenal's favour....

With no Walcott or Welbeck, Arsenal have lost a huge amount of pace up front and we really need that pace to give the United players a real worry about pressing forwards and pressuring our shaky defence.

With the trickery of Hazard and Moses, the strength of Lukaku and the precision passing of Mata and Oscar, Chelsea have enough to offer going forward and will give Madrid's defence something to be worried about.

As stated before, in the 4 -5-1 Gueye is left alone in front of the defence, which means he doesn't get the opportunity to push forward and win the ball in the midfield as he has to worry about leaving space in front of his centre - backs.

Im more worried about central defence.

For the first time in the game, nerves seemed to affect them, their defence dropping ever deeper, worried about Walcott racing in behind them.

Get the defence to worry about keeping the ball away from their goal and not doing Cruyff turns in their own box.

Well said, well played Tottenham whindeserved the win, but I'd like to say there is much more to come from this arsenal team, for the briefest moments in the game I witnessed enough to see when we get a head of steam and some form, we will be very difficult to stop going forward, as for defence, do city worry about that?

General Sir David Richards warned Ministry of Defence officials in a memorandum published by the Sunday Times that he was worried about the impact on morale of soldiers» experience between deployments.

Worries about the levels of public spending and the impact of defence cutbacks on troops in Afghanistan may be behind the change of heart.

The Tories have broken the rules and taken their seats but have now been told not to worry about it, effectively inviting politicians across the country to go ahead, break the rules and just claim ignorance as a defence.

But during a grilling by Commons Defence Committee, Mr Fallon said he shared MPs» worries about the traumatising effect the new police probe could have in ageing vets.

«Tory members reject bailout for Portugal and replacement taxes; they support second look at defence budget; and worry about rhetoric on cuts Main Should the Government be doing more for the Churches... or vice-versa?»

But officials at the US defence department and the ultrasecret National Security Agency remain reluctant, worried about compromising America's ability to eavesdrop on the rest of the world.

Turning all of a warchief's bodyguards against him before setting up a deadly ambush is a very rewarding experience, but so too is deciding that, actually, your army is probably strong enough to take the fort without worrying about stripping away every last one of its defences in advance.

This isn't a post in explicit defence of Vicarious Visions» decisions, though, it's rather a worried statement about the state of the headlines chosen to present their explanation for this slight physical shift.

And I'm not worried about that because I believe that in the meanwhile, we have that time to develop less carbon intensive forms of energy production, to walk away from the rising sea levels, and to build further inland, develop sea defences, etc, etc..