Sentences with phrase «worse city fuel»

Switching into the 6 - speed dual - clutch automatic — which, unusually, gets slightly worse city fuel - economy than the manual — there's little low - speed intractability.

Not exact matches

But the alternative of giving Scotland the ammunition to leave the UK, turning London from the booming city of Europe to a neurotic basket case and fuelling the already deep sense of fuming anxiety of those that supported Remain is much worse.

«These bags, they're made of petroleum products, fossil fuel, so that's bad for climate change,» he said on NY1's Road to City Hall.

The Volkswagen Touareg Hybrid is cancelled for 2016; this gas - electric SUV was previously the most expensive Touareg in the lineup, but provided worse fuel economy than the TDI models, at 20/24 mpg city / highway.

Fuel mileage is not as bad as I have heard, the sticker is about right, 16 in the City, 20 on the highway.

Fuel economy isn't bad for a truck, with it pulling 15 mpg in the city and 22 mph on the highway.

This is far from a bad thing, as real - world fuel efficiency for the Escape Hybrid (last built in 2012) shows as 34 - mpg in city driving and 31 - mpg on the highway.

With EPA - rated fuel efficiency of 17 miles per gallon city and 25 mpg highway, Caprice Classic will not win the economy sweepstakes; however, the mileage isn't bad for a large car with a 305 - cubic - inch (5 - liter) V - 8 engine and automatic transmission.

That falls significantly below the EPA's estimates of 28 city mpg and 40 highway, but if experience has taught me anything about three Car Tech editors sharing a car that claims a sporty pedigree, it's that our observed fuel economy is usually something of a worst - case scenario.

Fuel mileage, rated at 20 mpg city, 26 highway, isn't bad.

For a four - cylinder, the engine doesn't sound half bad at wide - open throttle, and it's fairly fuel - efficient, netting EPA ratings of 23 miles per gallon in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.

The Sienna $ 1,130 AWD upcharge isn't bad, but all - wheel - drive costs you about 10 % on fuel economy: 16 mpg city, 23 mpg highway, 19 mpg combined, vs. 18/25/21 for front - drive, which is another 1 - 2 mpg short of the class leader Odyssey.

Though it's not inherently a bad feature, we feel the traction benefits are outweighed by its cost ($ 1,850) and impact to fuel economy (26 / 31mpg for the city and highway respectively, versus the front - wheel drive Juke's claimed 28 / 32mpg ratings).

Considering the displacement and power, fuel economy isn't bad, either, returning 16 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway according to the EPA.

Fuel mileage is an EPA - rated 23 mpg in the city, 33 mpg on the highway, not bad for a 150 - horsepower car that weighs just shy of 3,000 pounds.

Fuel economy isn't bad for the turbocharged engine, with 17 mpg city and 25 mph highway.

The 2.0 - liter engine is well - matched to the five - speed manual transmission, and fuel mileage — 23 mpg city, 30 mpg on the highway, on regular gas — isn't bad, but the four - speed automatic transmission is actually rated a bit higher, at 24 mpg city, 32 mpg highway.

Oddly enough, the fuel - saving features of Subaru's CVT give it worse mileage than the manual (estimated at 21 mpg city and 28 mpg highway compared to the CVT's 19/25 rating).

My truck says the estimated mileage is 15 city / 21 hwy I drive normal and my mpg highway is 16 mpg and city 12 this has been my worst truck in fuel consumption, you can even see a dirty black tailpipe, dealer says, if it does not show codes it is fine it drives great and I like it except the mpg and no dic switch for a Lt I guess as not to scare us for the estimated mileage it was going to show honestly, if I had known of this poor mpg I would still be buying ford trucks, they always gave about 19 to 23 mpg my wife love it and at the same time hate it because it didn't came with running boards like all my other Fords other than that it is a great truck with poor mpg

Given the LX470's weight of about 4,700 pounds and the fact that it is always in four - wheel - drive, fuel mileage, while not great, isn't bad for the genre: 15 mpg in the city and 18 mpg on the highway.

Audi says the result is a 0 - to - 60 mph time of just 3.6 seconds, a top speed of 190 mph and not - too - bad EPA fuel economy ratings of 15 mpg city and 25 mpg highway.

Fuel mileage isn't bad at all with 18 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway.

Fuel economy is good in the city, very bad outside.

And fuel mileage wasn't bad — EPA - rated at 22 mpg city, 31 mpg highway.

The four - speed automatic is nicely matched to the engine, and the resulting fuel mileage — 21 mpg in the city, and 28 mpg on the highway — isn't bad, and regular gas is recommended.

Even with the 2.4 - liter's 16 - valve dual VVT (variable valve timing) technology, fuel economy is abysmal, mustering 20 mpg in the city and 23 on the highway, which is worse than some larger SUVs.

The fuel mileage isn't bad either with 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.

Not bad, given — if nothing else — grim fuel mileage of 12 miles per gallon city and 18 mpg highway for the vehicle tested, a 390 - horsepower Supercharged model, which is the same mileage a regular 300 - horse Sport gets.

This is too bad because driving the Mazda3 like this destroys what is otherwise an impressive fuel economy rating of 25 city and 37 highway mpg.

Fuel mileage isn't bad for a seven - passenger vehicle — 17 mpg in the city, 23 mpg on the highway, aided by a smooth - shifting five - speed automatic transmission.

With the optional 4MATIC four wheel drive system the fuel economy isn't hurt that bad: it's 24 mpg inside cities and 32 on the freeways.

With 230 horsepower and a five - speed automatic transmission, the 2005 RX330 has plenty of acceleration, and fuel mileage isn't bad — 19 mpg in the city, 25 mpg on the highway.

This in itself isn't bad and is quite good for city driving with great fuel economy returns of 31/40/35 mpg city / highway / combined.

Sadly, the fuel economy isn't great even by class standards, with the claimed fuel economy of 13mpg in the city and 17mpg on the highway being amongst the worst you'll find in this segment.

Adding insult to injury, it gets a fuel economy rating of 20 miles per gallon in the city, 24 miles per gallon on the highway, worse than the larger 3.5 - liter engine.

The Sonata Hybrid has worse fuel economy than the Fusion Hybrid in the city, but its EPA - estimated highway fuel economy rating is better than the Fusion.

Fuel mileage, EPA - rated at 16 miles per gallon city, 21 mpg highway, isn't bad.

The Reno is plenty competent, and fuel mileage — EPA - rated 23 mpg city, 30 highway — isn't bad.

Fuel mileage isn't bad, either, and that long has been a problem with Korean vehicles: The Sonata V - 6 is EPA - rated at 20 mpg city, 30 mpg highway.

The EPA - estimated fuel economy for the Golf Alltrack is 30 mpg highway and 22 mpg city — this is slightly worse than the Subaru Outback, equipped with the 2.5 L naturally - aspirated 4 - cylinder engine (32 highway, 25 city), and slightly better than the Outback with the 3.6 L (27 highway, 20 city).

The real strength of the Multi-Air engine is its fuel efficiency, offering 31mpg in the city and 38 mpg on the highway, the power - sapping automatics fare slightly worse.

Speaking at a panel discussion before an audience at the American Bar Association's annual meeting in New York City, 2nd circuit judge Robert Katzmann and 9th circuit judge M. Margaret McKeown described a crisis fueled by increased enforcement and detention, bad or non-existent lawyering for immigrants facing deportation, as well as overwhelmed immigration judges and appeal judges.