Not exact matches
On another
issue are these young players who were out there today the
future of a once great club then I fear for the
future, we are
in for a long period of trophy drought.That has got to be one of the
worst teams to wear the jersey and one of the
worst performances ever.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is
in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis...
in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but
in reality we have only 1 option with any real
future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far
worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest
in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie
in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base...
in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player
in question feel good about the way their
future potential employer feels about them)...
in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did
in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this
in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players
in the final third... he was never a good defensive player
in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely
in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too
bad, both will be deeply missed)...
in their places we need to bring
in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this
issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model
in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically
in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking
in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things
in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage
in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a
future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate...
in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success
in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even
worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real
issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..
I have read Chris Masterjohn's work and can't help but think a little may not be too
bad but I don't want to risk poor health
in the
future for something that is not a big part of my diet, although psychologically I seem to have
issues with giving it up entirely.
So you can see how estrogen and digestion actually compound each other and make your hormone
issues worse in the
future.
Some late payments are
worse than others however, as they may be portends of more significant
issues in the
future.
It's possible a host with a
bad connection could've caused some of these
issues, but I experienced it enough to suggest that these are
issues that Techland will have to clean up
in future updates.
«
Future Greats», December 2005 «Twelve Footnotes for Ian Monroe», Tom Morton, Show Catalog, Haunch of Venison, Zurich Art Review, «The Walls Came Down» Jay Merrick, July 2005 «Ian Monroe's Architecture», Barry Schwabsky, Show Catalog «They Built Upon It», Haunch of Venison, London 2004 Modern Painters, «All
in the Best
Bad Taste» Sally O'reilly, Dec 2004 - Jan 2005 2003 Art Monthly, «Anyway», Bruce Haines, May 2004, number 276 Contemporary, «The Queen Mum Show» Jamie Lau,
issue 53/54 The Times, «New Blood at RA Summer Show Gets Old Blood Boiling» Dalya Alberge, May 29 The Royal Academy of Arts Magazine, «Summer Exhibition» Sebastian Smee, Summer 2003, number 79 Arena, «The Boom», Tom Morton, July, number 136 The Spectator, «Formidable Power», Andrew Lambirth, May 17 Art Review, «Saatchi's New Sensation», Meredith Etherinton - Smith, May Evening Standard, Metro Life, «The Saatchi Effect» Hephzibah Anderson, April 18 The Observer, «Space Traveller», Alison Roberts, April 20 Telegraph Magazine, «Adventures
in Saatchiland», Colin Gleadell, March 29 2002 The Sunday Times, «Saatchi's Rival to the Tate Takes Shape» Richard Brooks, September 8 Time Out London.
Well since it is about accepting a very complex subject that is not always amenable to discussing various
issues in sound bites and because the
worst impacts occur
in the
future I don't think it can be definitive
in the minds of many people.
Both groups accept the premise that sea ice declines blamed on global warming are already a survival
issue for polar bears (that will become increasingly
worse in the
future).
Why are the health prospects for residents
in informal urban settlements so poor, and what
future issues will contribute to making these better or
worse?
I would however point out that an instance of North Dakota flooding or freezing is not «global» nor is it indicative of a trend — it is regional and is a single event, and let's please not be myopic here and muddle the
issues, as it's even
worse «science» to take a single isolated event
in time and geography and then attempt to extrapolate it out across the entire globe and into
future decades than to depict an out - of - context «hockey stick» of historic data as is being pointed out here.
«At best, you're going to tread water on the carbon
issue, and you're probably going to do
worse,» said Howard Herzog, a principal research engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a co-author of «The
Future of Coal,» a voluminous study published
in March by M.I.T. «It goes against the whole grain of reducing carbon.»
On this
issue like many others
in professional and other services practitioners have to prepare for the
worst, which equates to the EU Council's proposals for the
future.
In discussions of access to justice
issues or legal service markets, the present is the problem and the
future looks even
worse.
Hopefully, as awareness of the
issue grows (#metoo),
future lawyers who find themselves
in the position of covering for a sexual predator remember the (
bad) example of David Boies and take action to stop them.
At least if it's affordable, though perhaps less than ideal, because your condition can get
worse or you can develop other health
issues that'll make it even harder to get an affordable policy
in the
future.
Although these will most likely not have a huge effect on your insurance premiums, they could be a
bad omen signaling
issues in the
future.
Having a protective shield of insurance prepares you for the unexpected health
issues that can be even
worse for you
in the
future.
7/2011 to Present Benchmark Human Services, Nantucket, MA Behavior Analyst • Interview patients regarding their present, past and
future aspirations
in a bid to understand their motivations • Take notes to refer to during the assessment period • Measure specific influences such as environment and family life to determine cause of behavioral problems • Create psychological profiles for each patient to determine extent of behavior problems • Devise and implement programs to address behavior problems • Act as part of a coordinated care team to provide oral medication to patients • Monitor patients» progress and note down any significant changes for better or
worse • Assist patients with chemical dependency
issues to come to terms with their addiction through counseling services • Provide a one - on - one to patients with criminal backgrounds • Assist crime investigations by creating psychological profiles of criminals to determine motive and mode of operation
I'm not saying taking tests is easy for everyone, and that some people don't have real
issues, but often, we have one or two
bad experiences, so we conclude that our current experience will mirror those
in the
future.