Sentences with phrase «worse outcomes if»

These risks must be accepted should the downside risk to the economy lead to even worse outcomes if realized.

Why is everyone assuming it's a bad outcome if kids are drinking 10 % less milk than before?

What would be the maximum bad outcome if he invested in a company?

I know there are plenty of relators claiming to be specialist in short selling, but this could be a very bad outcome if homework and research is not done leading to foreclosure.

Risk Management is about minimizing the range of possible bad outcomes if a risk is taken, not eliminating all risk.

In my opinion, the UN and the «warmers» appear to have the same talents, only their con is on a a much larger (global) scale and will have not a good outcome as the movie, but will have a very bad outcome if they're left to complete their nefarious goals.

Not exact matches

Consider, if you will: of all the punishments (or more neutrally, all the bad outcomes) that could befall a sexist buffoon, which one do you think is most fitting?

Then determine what you will do if you are unable to prevent one of those «worst possible outcomes.»

An accountant has the necessary skills, knowledge and experience to help turn things around or in the worst case scenario, facilitate the best possible outcome if administration is the only option.

Conversely, if you manufacture excuses or try to lie your way out of it, you'll feel bad about yourself and the outcome will be less desirable.

«If we get to a place, we'll have to ask ourselves — is a negotiated settlement a better or worse outcome than if we litigatIf we get to a place, we'll have to ask ourselves — is a negotiated settlement a better or worse outcome than if we litigatif we litigate.

When even energy - friendly bodies such as the International Energy Agency say the world needs to act now if we're to avoid the worst outcomes of what climate change has to offer the planet, then Canada should realize it can ill afford to stick its head in the sand any longer.

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

The only really bad outcome occurs if rates increase while you are locked.

If this advance continues, I would expect to see reasonable opportunities for speculative exposure at contained risk, but it is a bad idea to chase market risk here, under conditions that have generally produced dismal outcomes throughout history.

If your statement was even remotely true (which it is not) your god would also be responsible for all negative and bad outcomes, thus making him good and evil.

Unfortunately, in combating this false understanding of addiction, Hitchens errs to the other extreme by implying that the will remains untouched by addiction and asserting that if addicts are held merely accountable for their actions and blamed for the outcome of those actions, then «huge numbers of people will give up a bad habit even if it is difficult.»

On the facts as I read them, the plaintiff's theory would leave no clear line between speaking one's mind and engaging in a criminal conspiracy, at least if speaking one's mind could be plausibly connected to some bad outcome.

But understand, that if god can see the future, If He knows the outcome of all of his creation (s), even before they exist, it still bodes badly for there being free wilif god can see the future, If He knows the outcome of all of his creation (s), even before they exist, it still bodes badly for there being free wilIf He knows the outcome of all of his creation (s), even before they exist, it still bodes badly for there being free will.

If in doing good ans shining, sharing the words of scrpture then makes other people feel bad about themselves because they are not like that and choose to insult then that would be the outcome.

You mean like when a parent who knows their teenager real well and would know what the outcome would be if their child makes certain bad choices, but decides not to stop the teenager from making those choices, perhaps as means to teach that teenager a lesson.

If the claims of Christianity are true, I will have realized the worst possible outcome of a human life.

We take responiblity for our actions and know that it was us making the choices and living the outcomes of said choice... its the nuts that claim divine intervention if it was good, if it was bad — it was the devil, or just the devil's influence.

Teach children that they will get in trouble if they hurt others, and they will behave better because they fear the bad outcomes of misbehavior.

That is, they give arguments in favor of their views as if questions of better and worse, truth or falsehood, were relevant to the outcome, as if, in other words, rational decision was possible.

I have experienced that if I am for instance worrieng, I have indeed gone away from Love and Trust in the NOW and have began to make my «own thoughts» about something going wrong or that a bad result will be the outcome of some of my decisions etc..

«This is what the word has grown into, a warning, a code word, a shorthand signal from the language itself: if man starts doing things reserved for the gods, deifying himself, the outcome will be something worse for him, symbolically, than the litters of wild boars and domestic sows were for the Romans.»

I've had some total wins with nutritional yeast and some not - so - delish outcomes (never bad, just not the cheesy flavor) I know that my red pepper flakes can lose some heat if they're in my pantry for a while!

So if we finish in the top 4 the final outcome of the season would not have been as bad as it had looked since December but that does not make it a successful season IMO.

If the Cavaliers had a bad offensive outcome in the run of play, chances are the Warriors turned it into a fast break.

Obviously talent wise it's a loss, but if he'd stayed and gone for nothing, that would have been a worse outcome as I can't imagine he'd have really got on with it for the rest of the season.

In any business, if the managerial side of things are run badly, you won't get much difference to the outcome by employing new staff to work under that same old system.

saying that the keynesian conception is about spending what you earn is the opposite of what it stands for (its actually what you haplessly describe as the neoclassical position) beyond the even more meaningless claim that wenger adheres to it... keynes broke with the idea that the economy was simply a collection of perfectly informed individuals and firms responding rationally to price incentives generated by market forces and that the big variables that frame an economies performance — output, employment, price level, wages, etc — tend to move in cycles and are shaped by decisions and judgements made under hugely uncertain conditions that if left to markets generate bad outcomes..

If he doesn't» it's not the worst possible outcome.

Whether the outcome of this is good or bad, none can tell until the very final moment, if that is a possibility?

As a follow up to that, if McCulloch was suggesting that there were not - bad homebirth outcomes wrongly attributed to hospital, how many of those births would have to be added to the homebirth group to actually make a difference in lessening the apparent stillbirth rate?

You appeared to interpret the comment as if she were suggesting that there were not - bad outcomes that were homebirth transfers to hospital that should be included in the homebirth set.

If an experienced doctor feels circumstances have began while in labor that might increase the risk of a bad outcome to my baby so a cesarean is recommended, that is good clinical practice.

If another bad outcome happens, you could have prevented it.

Bad outcomes can be terrible and if your care provider has insurance to cover it, that helps a bit.

There will be more outcomes like this — and worse — if freestanding birth centers spread.

If an uninsured midwife fails to prevent a preventable bad outcome she's free to decide it was the patient's fault and continue to practice the same way.

(Now, if there's a doctor who's doing mostly normal deliveries and getting worse than average outcomes, that's a matter for his colleagues, hospital, etc..)

It may also help explain why the US does comparatively well for perinatal outcomes but very badly in terms of infant mortality, if massive, high tech, emergency, intervention, which is readily available, has kicked the can down the road, past the neonatal period, but the baby dies at some later date (and it will be higher risk for the rest of infancy, at least, due to prematurity).

If they won't insure something it's because they know it is too dangerous and will end in bad outcomes that will lose them $.

If the insurance company won't cover it, it's because they have determined that the risk of a bad outcome is too high for the level of premium they are getting.

If you know that something is likely to have a bad outcome you can be certain that your obstetrician is fully aware!

A very good midwife has told me she was at a MANAstats meeting for midwives where the attendees were assured that if they had a bad outcome they could leave it out of their stats.

Being scared of a lawsuit is secondary, if you avoid «what might happen» by using interventions when they seem called for, you have no reason to fear a lawsuit — no one can sue if they don't have a bad outcome to sue for.

I work in the field and have seen many unfortunate events even with healthy moms and pregnancies, where if immediate attention was not given, the outcomes would have been much worse.