This gives them a far
worse risk reward potential on the trade which makes it a lot harder to turn a profit on the trade, chasing trades is not how a skilled and patient trader behaves.
«I feel more like it was in»04 where every bone in my body said this is
a bad risk reward, but I can't figure out how it's going to end.
Not exact matches
Regularly evaluate the
worst - case scenarios as well as the
risk -
reward ratio and face the things that scare you head - on.
''... I feel more like it as in»04 where every bone in my body said this is a
bad risk /
reward, but I can't figure out how it's going to end.
WARNING: DANGER AHEAD The
worse R / R, i.e. greatest
risk and lowest
reward is with the Nasdaq market now.
A contending team needed to have a much
worse option in their rotation to absorb that kind of contract /
risk /
reward combo.
Happy with our stance no
risk no
reward, and if the
worst case scenarios as you say happen then so be it, I won't dwell on it I just want Every player to give everything he has to the shirt, a desire to win and that's all season long no more ups and downs.
In Japan, a system of lifetime employment in many big businesses, a tradition of employer provided benefits such as housing in many cases, and a wage system in those kinds of businesses where workers receive a substantial share of their annual income in the form of an annual bonus whose size can be used to buffer good and
bad years for a company sharing
risks and
rewards with workers instead of limiting the
risks and
rewards to an investor class, have contributed to low levels of income inequality in the Japanese economy relative to comparably developed countries with comparable levels of government spending on welfare state type programs in other countries.
In a release, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said the men «join the ranks of high - level investment fund managers who are being made to answer for their extraordinarily
bad risk -
reward analysis about what is right and what is wrong.»
As long as you know to exit a
bad date gracefully, the
rewards of dating much outweigh the
risks.
He contends that having an investor face the possible losses of their specific portfolio in a
worst - case scenario helps him understand the trade - off between
risk and
reward.
And since the board / management are the obvious problem / road - block here in terms of capital allocation, I do think the recent board changes actually offer asymmetric
risk /
reward — at
worst, we end up with some new management / board members & just more of the same... but at best, we end up with a team who can actually deliver on acquisition (s) and / or a meaningful return of capital to shareholders (ideally, via a tender offer).
I don't recall having seen an example of that kind of situation myself — but I think I spoke to that
risk here: «At the v
worst, I think there's a
risk KWG shareholders end up cashed out, or flipped into Conwert shares, with little
reward in the way of a premium.»
For better or
worse, the securities you buy to represent each asset class should have roughly the same
risk and
reward characteristics of the asset class in general.
This transports them to a pleasant lower
risk / lower
reward place which they could (notionally) dwell in forever... But of course they won't, that's
worse than purgatory for them — it's simply a tipping point.
I genuinely believe the investment offers sensible
risk -
reward ratio - the building is cheap, we have a plan, the
worst case scenario is that we will sell it a few years down the line, chances are real - estate will preserve (or even appreciate) some of its value.
While this might sound
bad to some players Meld is completely optional, so it's up to you to weigh up the
risk vs
reward factor.
Risk /
Reward ratio turns
bad.
One example of «quality time» is taking the time at the outset to assess the legal matter in the larger context: What are the
risks and
rewards (beyond the legal system, i.e., political, social, business, as well as legal), what are the likely costs, what will the non-monetary costs be (including drain on personnel), what is the goal of the client, what is the other side (if this is a contested matter) up to, what are the opposition's strengths and weaknesses, and would procrastinating really be good or
bad?
That may not be an entirely
bad thing — regulatory change creates
risks and only possible
rewards — but in an increasingly disrupted legal services market, the status quo also creates
risks, ones to which the profession has not yet revealed itself able to respond.
High -
risk - high -
reward investing is not necessarily
bad, but you have to seriously look at your thought process to make sure that you're not:
The good, the
bad, and the risky: Self - esteem,
rewards and costs, and interpersonal
risk - regulation during relationship initiation.
It is important that landlords and property managers recognize that good tenants should be
rewarded, just as
bad tenants who do n`t pay rent and damage rental property should be evicted and identified as a high
risk or a
bad tenant.