Not exact matches
The study concluded that
burning natural gas — and in particular gas obtained through fracking — was
worse for the climate
than burning coal.
If we do nothing
worse than burn all the
coal, there is basically a slim and a none chance of a comfortable, non-tree hugging world ever existing.
We're going to
burn more
coal over the next 30 years
than in all of human history, CO2 emissions are rising at
worst case expectations, and we're looking at 6 degrees Farenheit temperature rise over that time.
That's despite that fact that many scientists disagree, and have argued that
burning wood can in fact be
worse for the climate
than burning coal.
But tar sands are between 12 and 20 percent more carbon intensive
than even regular oil, especially when
burning of the,
worse than coal, coke bi-product is taken into account.
If so, LNG tankers are far
worse for global warming
than burning coal for elctricity generation, since CH4 is one of the most potent greenhouse gasses.
«That U.S. exports of LNG to China could end up being
worse from a greenhouse gas perspective
than if China simply built a new power plant and
burned its own
coal supplies.»
Under long - standing regulations, they said, it would be «in the public interest,» even though science has recently made it clear that the methane leaking from the fracked gas the pipeline will carry is
worse than the
burning of
coal.
Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage; an interesting paper on how methane leakage from the natural gas industry could prove worse for climate change than burning coal (and it doesn't seem to consider the leakage from coal seam g
Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage; an interesting paper on how methane leakage from the natural gas industry could prove
worse for climate change
than burning coal (and it doesn't seem to consider the leakage from coal seam g
coal (and it doesn't seem to consider the leakage from
coal seam g
coal seam gas).
The proven health problems relating to the
burning of fossil fuels (especially
coal, bunkering oil used for shipping, and diesel oil) are far
worse than any that are claimed to be caused by wind turbines.
I think you could make the case that consistently breathing PM from wood
burning fires would be much
worse for those individuals
than the longer term ill effects of global warming, etc.... just as it would be
worse for individuals to be in the path of
coal burning smoke as opposed to suffering the long term consequences.
Also on TreeHugger
Coal in China China's
Coal Fires
Burn 20 Million Tons of
Coal Per Year Mercury From Chinese
Coal Use Pollutes Oregon's Willamette River Huge Drop in Chinese Birth Defects After Local
Coal Plant Closes Teacher Pension Funds Investing In Chinese
Coal Industries Environmental Awareness in China Pollution in China is
Worse Than Ever, Citizens Say China's Grassroots Green NGOs Double in Three Years China's Newest Anti-Pollution Weapon: A Map Health and the Environment Asthma: Treehugger and Planet Green Planet Green: Food and Health 5 Health Benefits of Green Energy Sources
Back in 2011, a Cornell University research team first made the groundbreaking discovery that leaking methane from the shale gas fracking boom could make
burning fracked gas
worse for the climate
than coal.