Climate change policies really are
worse than climate change.
When the climate medicine is
worse than the climate ailment, especially when the ailment may not harm me, then why bother?
We are experiencing the sixth mass extinction event, with the planet Earth losing species at 100 to 1000 times the natural extinction rate, according to the University of Copenhagen news article The biodiversity crisis:
Worse than climate change.
When one says he has been to Greenland and it is even
worse than the climate scientists are saying, and another asks why she is only applying uncertainty to the consensus view and not her own, and another asks what her actual change to policy - making would be, it is a tough audience.
(Source: Britain to Halt Onshore Wind Projects: «Wind Farm Impacts May Be
Worse Than Climate Change»)
This is not meant to pre-judge whether those risks are
worse than climate change impacts under plausible emission scenarios and is not meant to claim that all geoengineering strategies are dangerous or risky.
To be fair there are also good things happening (innovations, new determinations followed by effective actions to «do good,» etc), but it seems with all the negative consequences (for humans and other living things), an honest forecast bringining in everything conceivalbe would probably be much much
worse than a climate change scenario.....
The effects of geoengineering could be
worse than climate change, so we need to do our homework rather than assume it can stave off disaster.
Not exact matches
WASHINGTON — Biofuels made from the leftovers of harvested corn plants are
worse than gasoline for global warming in the short term, a study shows, challenging the Obama administration's conclusions that they are a much cleaner oil alternative and will help combat
climate change.
Fraser Surrey Docks aims to boost US coal exports; opponents warn
climate impacts
worse than Northern Gateway.
Bad as the actions of the APS were, they were far better
than those of most other scientific societies, which refused to even reconsider extreme statements on
climate.
They are
worse than holding society back, these deniers are same who deny
climate change, and change public policy to detriment of all.
Given the warm
climate and primitive sanitary conditions he probably had
worse digestive problems
than most of us have today.
Simone said he wanted to promote the fact that vegetables and pulses are more
climate - and human - friendly
than animal proteins, which are
bad for the health and the production of which leads to environmental degradation and an increased carbon footprint.
maybe you don't understand that Wenger's words are simply an attempt to recover some of the market value that was lost due to the way they have mishandled his contract negotiations, which means that everyone, once again, knows that we have little to no leverage when it comes to negotiating a transfer... much like we did with RVP, when we sold the EPL trophy to ManU for less
than $ 25 million... any reputable team with a sporting director would never have allowed this situation to occur again and if they had heads would roll... if handled correctly the
worst case scenario would have seen us get a minimum of $ 65 million for a player of his ilk in the present economic
climate and we could have used those funds to purchase the best available striker in the early days of the transfer window... just imagine what outsiders must think about the state of our team if all you did was read the headlines... sadly, things might just might be
worse than they think
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future
than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic
climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the
worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
Even when the figures are not adjusted for
climate, we are still
worse than countries such as Sweden and Germany, which we would not expect.
Shadow business secretary says current economic
climate is
worse than that faced by Margaret Thatcher in 1979
Let's see... We're No. 1 in property taxes nationwide; No. 1 in overall taxes; we're ranked as the state with the
worst economic outlook in America by the American Legislative Exchange Council; we have the most corrupt state government in America, according to the University of Illinois; we're losing more citizens to other states
than any other state; we're 48th in business
climate, according to the Tax Foundation; we have the second - highest electric rates in the country; we rank as the
worst state in America in which to retire, and the list goes on.
The development of natural gas, far from being a bridge fuel, makes
climate change
worse because it is so much more potent
than carbon near term.
A new analysis suggests New York might deal with sea level rise and flood risk by a system of small levees and raising buildings unless
climate change is
worse than anticipated
That means the future of agriculture as the
climate changes could be even
worse than this prediction — and that's before taking into account other factors such as the effect of pests.
California regulators may rule that the biofuel is no better — and might be
worse —
than petroleum for solving
climate change
With the U.S. Congress set to take up
climate change legislation next week, Obama Administration officials today joined with leading
climate scientists to emphasize that global warming is real, it's going to get
worse, and that action is needed sooner rather
than later.
There are many types of HFCs, and some are
worse for the
climate than others.
Co-author, Dr James Risbey of Australia's CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, said: «Some point to uncertainty as a way to minimize the
climate change problem, when in fact it means that the problem is more likely to be
worse than expected in the absence of that uncertainty.
Climate change is likely to be
worse than many computer models have projected, according to a new analysis.
A new model developed at Princeton University predicts that, if the poor continue to be affected in this way — and current
climate policies remain the same — the world's future poor will be even
worse off
than impoverished people today.
Worse,
climate models predict that the areas where marine preserves are most prevalent — coastal regions in the northern hemisphere — will see greater increases in temperature
than the oceans as a whole, Halpin said.
Ongoing science reveals that
climate change is
worse than we feared.
We emphatically did not show that
climate change was «less
bad» or «happening slower»
than previously thought.
Consequences of global sea level rise could be even scarier
than the
worst - case scenarios predicted by the dominant
climate models
But the discovery suggests impacts from
climate change will be
worse, and that they will get
worse more quickly
than earth models had previously indicated.
In terms of global
climate change, the new studies show that «the actual situation is
worse»
than policymakers realize, says Peter Griffith, an ecosystems ecologist with NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.
«With a warming
climate, rising carbon dioxide levels, dams on more rivers
than not, and overloading of nutrients into our waterways, the magnitude and duration of toxic cyanobacterial blooms is only going to get
worse.»
«And more
than just deny it, his policies would make
climate change
worse.»
However, the city needs to be planning for those types of huge barriers more as part of a longer - term plan, and as preparation for the possibility that
climate change and sea - level rise may be
worse than expected, warns the analysis, published last week in Science.
Nevertheless, they wrote, «The asteroid - threat community has been much more successful
than the
climate change community in characterizing the dominant
worst - case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers, the media and the public — even though the
climate change threat is more
than a thousand times greater..., [therefore] quantitative comparison of
climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats into perspective.»
For example, burning compressed natural gas emits roughly 30 percent less CO2
than burning diesel but, if the new methane leakage estimates are true, the practice ends up being
worse for
climate change.
«
Climate outlook may be
worse than feared, global study suggests.»
The consequences of global sea level rise could be even scarier
than the
worst - case scenarios predicted by the dominant
climate models, which don't fully account for the fast breakup of ice sheets and glaciers, NASA scientists said today (Aug. 26) at a press briefing.
But the
bad news is that the
climate system is much more sensitive to greenhouse gases
than previously guessed.
Climate Change: The Last Great Global Warming (p 56) The levels of carbon dioxide release and current speed of warming across the globe could lead to extinctions on a scale
worse than previously thought, an article in this month's Scientific American suggests.
In summary the projections of the IPCC — Met office models and all the impact studies (especially the Stern report) which derive from them are based on specifically structurally flawed and inherently useless models.They deserve no place in any serious discussion of future
climate trends and represent an enormous waste of time and money.As a basis for public policy their forecasts are grossly in error and therefore
worse than useless.For further discussion and an estimate of the coming cooling see http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com
The NGN article itself gives a good explanation of
climate sensitivity and the various studies and estimates of it, and does quote Michael Schlesinger of the University of Illinois saying that Hegerl's result «means
climate sensitivity is larger
than we thought for 30 years, so the problem is
worse than we thought.
Decades of
climate research could be wrong, meaning we're in a much
worse situation
than previously thought.
The study concluded that burning natural gas — and in particular gas obtained through fracking — was
worse for the
climate than burning coal.
Worse, America could end up with a pile of greenhouse gas regulations more costly
than any
climate bill or treaty the Senate has declined to pass or ratify, yet without the people's representatives ever voting on it.
Re the cost of flying, there are lots of assumptions around because of different ways of using or ignoring a 1999 report on aviation's role in global warming [Aviation and the Global Atmosphere] for the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change — the effects of flying are much
worse than would be predicted by just burning the oil.
The threats posed by
climate change are
worse than those imagined by most governments, warned Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, the scientist who heads the Potsdam Institute for Research on Global Warming Effects and acts as an adviser to German Chancellor Angela Merkel on
climate - change issues.