Sentences with phrase «worse than gameplay»

Not exact matches

Very good game for it's time, it has certainly aged somewhat badly graphics wise, but gameplay holds up and its definitly better than some more

Gameplay is still solid in general but don't even both with the campaign as it's even worse than BC2's.

Too bad the tweaks to the time - tested gameplay (smarter bodyguards, more balanced weaponry, etc.) and handful of new gameplay modes (Bridge Melee) are beginning to show more desperation than innovation or creativity.

If there's still anyone who can support my cause on how the vehicle, even though it may not be better than the original gameplay, is not all that bad and can still be enjoyable in Mario Party 10, please leave a reply.

Being a fan of Zelda because of it's gameplay, I think this game is more about fan service than anything, which is not a bad thing per sé, but in order to play this game you got to get in the hype train.

i agree to what you're saying and as a matter of fact the gameplay they showed may look worse than the original but in case you missed it, it does say in very BIG LETTERS 40 % PERCENT DONE!!!

The last 2 you did nt have to add lol, cut scenes tend to look worse since the resolution stretches it out:P, but the gameplay shots don't look much older than RPGs this gen surprisingly.

Overall you could easily beat the campaign in less than 10 hours of gameplay but that isn't necessarily a bad thing.

When it comes to the cinema / dialogue scenes, the art looks worse than during normal gameplay — which I think is backwards.

Even worse are the games that have deep back stories but merely post them on their websites rather than integrating it into the gameplay itself.

However, all is not bad as they have released a brand new gameplay trailer to more than make up for it!

Felt a lot of it's bad feedback was simply reactionary rather than down to genuine gameplay criticism.

It isn't at all a bad thing, since the actual gameplay is so fun that replaying areas is more of a treat than a chore.

In fact, she endures more mental and physical punishment than most other characters by the end of the first hour of gameplay and it only gets worse from there.

1.0 - Games that score this low are terrible for many more reasons than just a bad gameplay experience.

Other than that, though, Daud's abilities and gadgets aren't very different from Corvo's, and so gameplay feels very familiar to the original Dishonored, though that is by no means a bad thing given just how strong that gameplay formula is.

It's not a bad game, I could see myself enjoying it much more than Minecraft, Terraria / Starbound or even Destiny if they would just improve the rather repetitive gameplay loop.

Fist of all, a lot of footage so far has clearly been Alpha (missing texture pack, lighting etc.), second of all, why would Gears of War 4 look any worse than the E3 gameplay reveal, let alone worse than Gears Ultimate Edition!

The protagonist was completely unlikeable and brimming with flimsy motivations, the vehicles handled worse than those in GTA IV, the hacking function of the gameplay felt gimmicky rather than innovative and the replay - ability was nonexistent.

Okay, these so called professionals all base the game on the plot, uhh, just playing the demo or watching the trailer will immeadiatly tell you this game isnt about plot, the reason i like this game iscause it is a casual game where you can feel like you can finish it, you know carrying on through the adventure mode little by little, its not meant for the hardcore, while more gameplay mechanics would of been nice (just using the stick and a button is definatly over used) but the real reason this game is fun, the price, its just # 3 ($ 5) and considering a hell of alot of worse games cost more than double this on live arcade you could do alot worse, the only thing blocking this from an 8 is the online community is dead, unfortunatly!

The game is built more around how the story unfolds rather than the gameplay which is good or bad depending on how you look at it.

I prefer games that emphasise their campaign and try to build on the fundamental basics of gameplay and storytelling.It seems that since the PS3 / Xbox 360 came along it's become mandatory that you have to have multiplayer, even if it's worse than death itself.

So: great 2D mecha game, has some truly insane and fun gameplay mechanics, great title, supports indie developers, maybe a tad too easy if you're badder than the average badass, COSTS ONLY A DOLLAR.

And it might seem like I am hating on the game, and I am really not, but this is the kind of game that wasn't made for gamers like me clearly, and I understand that and I am not saying it is a bad game because I know that if you like these type of emotional roller coaster games, with quick - time events and conversation options more than overall gameplay then this is right up your alley, I am just saying that if you are something like me you should probably see some videos of the actual controller setup before you buy this game.

If you have $ 49.99 to spare and you want a unique cooperative gameplay experience, then you can do a lot worse than this.

Both Heavy Rain and Beyond: Two Souls featured gameplay that feels more like playing a movie than a game, but is that a bad thing?

Its gameplay is faster than Battlefield 4 but for some reason the graphics look worse.

If you just want to dip your toes into battle royale without spending any money, you could do a lot worse than Last Man Standing, a free - to - play battle royale game with a surprising amount of depth and gameplay features.

Finally, the gameplay and combat design is worse and though it can be hard to notice upon multiple playthroughs it becomes much clearer how much worse Uncharted 3 plays than Uncharted 2.