Sentences with phrase «worse than our standardized test»

That increases pixel count by about 18 percent, however, so real - world performance may prove even worse than our standardized test figures suggest.

Not exact matches

My concern derives from more than a bad day with a standardized test.

«Our findings reveal that, across all grades and subjects, students in online charter schools perform worse on standardized assessments and are significantly less likely to pass Ohio's test for high school graduation than their peers in traditional charter and traditional public schools,» said McEachin.

«So here is my prediction: if we tested another culture, with equally limited standardized schooling but egocentric spatial language, they should perform worse than the Haikom.

Studies show a familiar pattern: middle - income black and Latino students faring worse than their white counterparts with respect to grades, enrollment in advanced courses, and performance on standardized tests.

This summer, a Stanford University study estimated students in 37 percent of the nation's charter schools have performed worse on state standardized tests than their peers in typical public - school districts.

The most startling of these reports indicated that students who used school vouchers performed much worse on standardized tests than those who remained in traditional public schools.

A recent Education Department analysis of that program found that after a year in private school, voucher recipients performed worse on standardized tests than their counterparts who remained in public school.

A recent study of that program, released in July by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute, found that students who used the vouchers to attend private schools actually performed worse on standardized tests than similar students who stayed in public schools.

Students who are not fluent in English and whose parents are not college educated and have low incomes generally fare worse on standardized tests than students who come from more affluent backgrounds and whose parents are highly educated.

By Valerie Strauss April 28, 2010; 9:00 AM ET Categories: Guest Bloggers, Lisa Guisbond, No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, Standardized Tests, Teachers Tags: Race to the Top, growth models, how to evaluate teachers, nclb, no child left behind, schools and growth models, standardized tests, teacher assessment, teacher evaluation, teachers Save & Share: Previous: New study: 1 in 3 college students transfer Next: Social media addiction: Worse thStandardized Tests, Teachers Tags: Race to the Top, growth models, how to evaluate teachers, nclb, no child left behind, schools and growth models, standardized tests, teacher assessment, teacher evaluation, teachers Save & Share: Previous: New study: 1 in 3 college students transfer Next: Social media addiction: Worse than you Tests, Teachers Tags: Race to the Top, growth models, how to evaluate teachers, nclb, no child left behind, schools and growth models, standardized tests, teacher assessment, teacher evaluation, teachers Save & Share: Previous: New study: 1 in 3 college students transfer Next: Social media addiction: Worse thstandardized tests, teacher assessment, teacher evaluation, teachers Save & Share: Previous: New study: 1 in 3 college students transfer Next: Social media addiction: Worse than you tests, teacher assessment, teacher evaluation, teachers Save & Share: Previous: New study: 1 in 3 college students transfer Next: Social media addiction: Worse than you think

One such study was released this April, showing that students in the only federally funded voucher program, in Washington, D.C., performed worse on standardized tests within a year after entering D.C. private schools than peers who did not participate.

Yet, if he is to be truly «transparent about data,» Duncan would have to admit that, after the turnaround, Sherman actually performed worse on standardized tests than several schools CPS proposed to close for poor performance in 2009.

And they earn worse grades and score lower than classmates on standardized tests.

Studies so far tell us that we can expect the «better» teacher's students to score about 6 percentile points higher, on average, on a standardized achievement test than the students of the «worse» teacher.

Yet a StateImpact Indiana analysis of results from the state's standardized test released Tuesday also show passage rates among charter schools with high percentages of low - income students are slightly worse than passage rates in public schools, as the graph after the jump shows.

When girls fill out the gender bubble on standardized assessments before a math or science test, they do demonstrably worse than when they fill out the bubble after taking the test.

Whether the measure is proficiency on standardized tests, graduation rates or college completion, the outlook in terms of school performance is significantly worse for low - income students than for their middle - income and wealthy peers.

A recent study of that program, released in July by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute, found that students who used the vouchers to attend private schools performed worse on standardized tests than similar students who stayed in public schools.

Students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds typically perform worse on standardized tests than their wealthier peers.