There's nothing
worse than reading a book with obvious spelling and grammar errors that rip you out of being immersed in a story.
There is nothing
worse than reading a book that has words in the book's crease.
Not exact matches
It's missing the point on a scale that is arguably
worse than someone
reading the
Book of Genesis and concluding that the earth is less
than 10,000 years old...
Read a
book called «Your Inner Fish» by Neil Shubin, it will explain what the DNA shows, i.e. that is
worse than you imagine.
* gulp * I've done
worse things
than read nakedpastor's cartoons and
read books!
Those inclined to argue that Jesus now would advise us precisely the opposite of what he did in the New Testament — this on the basis that, regarding both tax demands and military activity, our U.S. Caesar is so much
worse than his Roman one was — these people should be warned against
reading Martin Hengel's little
book Victory Over Violence.
Thank God for them all, of course, and for that strange interval, which was most of my life, when I
read out of loneliness, and when
bad company was much better
than no company You can love a
bad book for its haplessness or pomposity or gall, if you have that starveling appetite for things human, which I devoutly hope you never will have.
I just
read a great
book about supplements and how
bad they can actually be for you, particularly antioxidants, as they behave differently in a petri dish
than in our bodies.
There is nothing
worse or will make a customer run away faster
than reading a
book.
If you're interested in
reading about the collective set of them and learning how to optimize female skin, weight loss, and hormone balance, for a few examples, you could do
worse than my best - selling
book, Sexy by Nature, here.
Based on all my research, all the documentaries that I've watched, the
books I've
read, the countless hours scouring the internet, I am convinced more
than ever that GMO soy is
bad news and if you do wish to consume healthy dishes containing organic soy, go for fermented soy products and avoid the GMO and processed kinds.
Nor is a boy going to become a
bad guy, say the authors, because he
reads some of the
books, watches some of the shows, or listens to types of music that portray males as less
than exemplary role models.
For someone such as your editor, who can claim more
than his fair share of conservative and libertarian bona fides, Malkin's screeds
read more like something written by the notoriously solipsistic traditionalist Susan Ohanian (and
worse, one of Kennedy assassination conspiracy - theorist Mark Lane's execrable
books)
than something written by one of the conservative movement's leading polemicists.
If you're after a good
book to
read, you could do
worse than choose one of mine!
I've
read a few that were far, far
worse than any traditional
book I've seen, at least in terms of the writing and editing.
especially since I can only «
read» audio - there's nothing
worse than having an audio
book that suddenly becomes a sex-fest while your kids or grandkids are wandering in and out.
«If the
book is unique and meaningful, the debut author doesn't yet have a
bad sales track record so we can look at their
book with all of the rosiness of potential rather
than reality» Good... [
Read more...]
But concluding that all
book trailers are a silly approach to
book promotion doesn't make any more sense
than deciding that blogging for
book publicity is a
bad idea after you've seen a
badly - written
book blog, or reasoning that media releases don't work after you've seen an incompetently - handled press release (most likely, one that
reads as if it were an ad for a
book, which won't accomplish anything, rather
than an actual news release, which most likely will help you achieve your
book promotion goals).
It's
worse than losing the author to death, in some way, because it not only ruins the
book we just
read, it ruins our choice to ever
read another word this author may write.
~
Bad or nonexistent research: I can't stand stories that show the writer just followed cliches or what she'd
read in other
books, rather
than do thorough research and fact - checking herself.
We have the wagons filled with authors who think that they are going to break big because they
read someone's work that sort of sucked (but who is a household name) and they think, hey, my crappy
book doesn't suck any
worse than theirs, maybe I'll throw it up on Amazon and see if it finds an audience.
It's going on two years, and I've been able to wheedle less
than 20 Amazon reviews, though I'd asked people (politely) I knew who had
read the
book to say ANYTHING good or
bad about the
book, just a sentence or two, since Amazon reviews, even some tepid ones, can drive sales.
Recasting various villains from the Marvel 616 universe in «a galaxy different
than our own», this is comic
book reading at its over-the-top best and
worst.
I also don't think it's any
worse to create a good review of a
book you don't like or haven't
read when you're doing it for money
than when you do it for love / friendship.
Read my blog here (I share everything I've done — the good and the
bad), come to my weekly #BookMarketingChat * (on Twitter, every Wednesday 6 pm pst / 9 pm est) to learn from me (and people far smarter
than me) who know a lot about
book marketing and the publishing industry, and then start interacting and asking questions.
So when I
read articles like this, or
books about systemic risk by academics that are so
bad that I don't want to review them (set them to work picking fruit, it would be more valuable
than what they currently do), I simply say systemic risk is easy.
As the
book nears the finish Mike describes the value of the peer - review process in rooting out
bad science but admits it is not perfect and it is much slower
than the immediately available Internet pseudo-science that most in the public
read.