Sentences with phrase «worse than that base»

The «premium» sound system on the 2016 Accord EX-L trim sounds worse than the base Fit Model.

If there were to be a dropoff in players, it would almost certainly affect the DLC servers worse than the base game servers, as the expansions have a smaller player base than the main game.

Not exact matches

A 2013 study of more than 1,000 U.S. - based employees, conducted by Kelton, revealed that 40 percent of employees say they don't completely understand the company's vision, or even worse, haven't even been exposed to it.

Authors of The Fundamental Index: A Better Way to Invest, they found that building indexes based purely on market cap produced worse returns than indexes based on other measures.

«There's nothing worse than going for lunch and getting to your afternoon meeting with big pit stains under your arms,» says Melissa Austria, founder of Toronto - based menswear clothing store Gotstyle.

But if you already offer health insurance, as do more than 90 percent of large companies, things may look worse than they really are, according to a new study conducted by ADP, a large benefit and payroll processing firm based in Roseland, New Jersey.

(Worse, 73 percent of respondants think these web - based threats are going to be more difficult to manage than e-mail based threats.)

The vow came as the Calgary - based company blamed clogged export pipelines for its worst heavy oil price discounts in five years during the first three months of 2018, contributing to a higher - than - expected $ 914 - million net loss in the first quarter.

Whether you are feeling bad because you think your peers are doing better than you, or you are building yourself up based on their failures, both are unproductive and have the potential to be self - destructive.

Worse than that, he suspected that the Shanghai - based factory was using his company's designs to sell its products to other customers.

The retail giant cut its forecast for the full year, pushing the shares to their worst day in more than 25 years on a percentage basis.

That figure, which comes out to a combined 360 billion euros ($ 401 billion) in bad debt, is more than three times the bank loans that were bad in the U.S. on a percentage basis at the height of the financial crisis.

Think of it as a homeowner who borrows based on the inflated value of a home: When this «carbon bubble» bursts — for example, when governments finally enact policies to restrict or penalize the burning of carbon — the devaluation of fossil fuel reserves may be even worse than the housing bubble that sent shock waves down Wall Street five years ago.

The only difference between the two is that the price carnage in silver has been far worse than it has been in gold, on a percentage basis.

Just yesterday, we learned that retail sales for the month of June fell 0.5 % on a sequential basis, far worse than what the consensus expected.

While ININ operated in the cloud based services industry, its profitability fell below many competitors, and worst of all, its costs were growing significantly faster than revenues.

Currently the UK has a $ 243B annual budget deficit that is slightly larger on a % of GDP basis than ours — making the UK & the US the worst in the G20 group from a budget deficit perspective.

In the March quarter, revenues were down 10 % on a year over year basis, which was worse than our expectation for a low single - digit fall.

Ezrati rules this out, not on the basis of any sort of calculation, but simply because it doesn't seem «reasonable» (and certainly not fair) that the market should perform worse in a good economy than in a bad one.

That was a bit worse than even the estimate based on a terminal P / E of 7, because the brutal 1974 bottom formed a sharp but temporary «V.» In contrast, in the 10 years beginning in 1990 (when the price / peak - earnings ratio was close to 11), the S&P 500 achieved a total return of fully 20 % annually.

The main presuppositions about sentiment which behavioural finance are starting to confirm are mainly that 1) investors overemphasise the significance of fundamental data to the detriment of other equally important but more overlooked data that still can have an effect on a share's price 2) investors take losses a lot worse than the pleasure of making a winning trade and 3) investors continue in the mistakes they make with regard to bad methodology and repeating mistakes based upon emotion.

As we tried to distinguish between good and bad reasons to worry about the euro area outlook, we concluded that some of those concerns look overdone, largely based on the view that the improvement in domestic demand should more than compensate for external weakness.

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

So, you have no basis to call anything «bad», other than your own definitions of personal comfort.

The one thing they all have in common is willingness to believe without question based on nothing more than faith — the world's worst decision - making method.

Beliefs that hinge on a guess can't be taken lightly, but we have a lot of people making their own bad decisions that are based on their treating their religious path as fashion or a trend rather than something to be lived.

However, the Beast - religion will have a worse God than Allah: A man (much worse than Hitler or Stalin and even more intelligent), following his basest instincts, an arch-malefactor, an arch-barbarian.

I hope more people behave sensibly and sanely than to demonize one group based on a few bad eggs.

On the other hand, using that as a basis to say authorities should be «protecting» us from bad life decisions and taxing us simply because we have more than our neighbor is irrational and self - destructive.

Worse, Callahan supports the odious approach of the UK rationing board NICE and the QALY system it imposes on the people of the United Kingdom, a policy in which the young and able - bodied have greater value than others based on «quality of life» judgmentalism:

Some how it's felt that values, morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws of men rather than what has been relayed by Holy books that calls for good deeds and reject bad deeds and to build a faithful societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations of mixed cultures and beliefs... Laws or God and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built on nations beliefs to achieve the code of understanding among nations but as can see now it is build on groundless bases if not of words of God to faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make decisions of faith but at the moment the secular world make and take the decisions while the beliefs and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture and beliefs of the nation or nations under one country flag...!

... and how much worse it would be if she had relied on prayer rather than science - based medical care for her child.

To call those who actually reflect on their own spirituality and make conscious efforts to live based on a moral compass, rather than as herded sheep, self - obsessed is not only pretentious but a reflection of your indoctrination in the school of those who believe out of fear — which is worse?

I came to realize that my understanding of these words was based more on pop culture, bad theology, and advertising than on the actual words themselves.

Fry and Rostow reported that, based on evidence in service records, hom - ose - xuals were no better or worse than other soldiers and that many «performed well in various military jobs» including combat (Berube, 1990, pp. 170 - 171, footnotes omitted).

If open to interpretation than any interpretation is as good or bad as another, and therefore can not be the basis of any spiritual «Truth».

Yet some either deny a concept of God based on a human like diety... without logically understanding it has to be something more than that... or worse only see a chaotic uncaring universe..., without understanding the complexity of the infinite miracles, defined by science alone, not to mention the influence of noy yet known to science, occurences... that have occurred for billions of years to end up in their creation and also supporting their every day survival.

Too bad for the Atheists... the 12 Steps are completely based on CHRISTIAN values and doctrines... they use Higher Power rather than «Jesus»... the majority of non-believing 12 steppers eventually come to find out that there IS indeed a God and HE is the ONLY way to manage addiction!

If the main reason our reps have been chosen because they believe and pray to the spaghetti monster in the sky, based on the mess hey have produced and keep making worse, there prayers have been a useless waste of time which would have been much better spent to actually work on the problem rather than praying about it.

Those inclined to argue that Jesus now would advise us precisely the opposite of what he did in the New Testament — this on the basis that, regarding both tax demands and military activity, our U.S. Caesar is so much worse than his Roman one was — these people should be warned against reading Martin Hengel's little book Victory Over Violence.

The movement of the Beast will have a worse God than Allah: A man (much worse than Hitler or Stalin and even more intelligent), following his basest instincts, an arch-malefactor, an arch-barbarian, an arch-blasphemer.

And yeah, you can convince yourself that vegan junk food is slightly less bad than its animal - based counterpart, but that still doesn't mean it's a good idea to eat every day.

She reports having had worse reactions on the gluten - free version of restaurant - made or store - bought cakes, pizza bases and breads than to the original.

Cazorla — too bad he was lost too soon... not blinded enough to think he would solve all of our ills but he was and is the only deep - lying player on this team that can pass more than 12 yards on a consistent basis... like Rosicky, gone way too soon but can't dwell on it too long or we end up in the crazy world of Wenger's man love for the one and only Diaby... don't resign because even if he were to come back he's been out to long and he just gives Wenger an excuse to not replace with talent

Of course it's imperfect data, but the point still holds that it's hard to look at that data and say Eagles fans are worse than other fan bases.

The Yankees are giving up too much offense as a team, as they're also struggling to produce at third base (where Chase Headley and Friends have been significantly worse than average) and in center field whenever Jacoby Ellsbury is the one patrolling it.

As for Ozil, pay him what he wants and make commensurate demands of him namely he is not allowed more than two bad games a season (and I don't mean crucial games) or else he will see the bench like any other inconsistent player, if he wants ballon d'or salary, we need ballon d'or performances from him on a consistent basis.

I'm saying the fan / donor base is practically the worst and damages the program worse than Edsall did because it can't be replaced by at least an average and supportive fan / donor base

It's important to note that the UMD fan base and donor base is the second to worst and cheapest in the conference so it's even worse than Edsall by any objective manner.

than the other backs, and his hands aren't bad based on his workouts.