Over the last year, critical news articles from national newspapers like the New York Times and Washington Post have questioned the quality of education the company offers, pointing out overbilling for ineligible students in Colorado and a Pennsylvania school where virtual students performed significantly
worse than their public school peers.
Not exact matches
«Our findings reveal that, across all grades and subjects, students in online charter
schools perform
worse on standardized assessments and are significantly less likely to pass Ohio's test for high
school graduation
than their
peers in traditional charter and traditional
public schools,» said McEachin.
This analysis (again the Newspeak) builds on a large body of program evaluations in Louisiana, Indiana, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., all of which show that students attending participating private
schools perform significantly
worse than their
peers in
public schools — especially in math.
It also shows that white and black students who attend the
public schools in which ELL students are concentrated are doing
worse than their
peers who attend
public schools with few English language learner students.
This summer, a Stanford University study estimated students in 37 percent of the nation's charter
schools have performed
worse on state standardized tests
than their
peers in typical
public -
school districts.
So when the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the nation's second - largest teachers» union, published a study in August 2004 that found students at charter
schools performing
worse than their
peers at traditional
public schools, more
than a few hopes were dashed.
And Trump's nominee for deputy secretary, Mitchell «Mick» Zais, said that he was «unaware» of research showing that students who received vouchers in states such as Indiana, Louisiana, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., performed
worse on tests
than their
public school peers.
In Cleveland, voucher students in most grades performed
worse than their
peers in
public schools in math, though they did better in reading.
In many states, in fact, voucher students do no better — and sometimes fare
worse —
than their
peers in
public schools.
When the American Federation of Teachers published a study that found students at charter
schools performing
worse than their
peers at traditional
public schools, more
than a few hopes were dashed.
It found that students who used vouchers did not see academic gains in their new
schools and that they performed
worse, on average,
than their matched
peers in the
public schools that they left.