Sentences with phrase «worst case assumptions»

The total time frame for withdrawals would be between 29 and 30 years under such worst case assumptions.

This is a worst case assumption.

Not exact matches

The study makes worst - case assumptions that may inflate the cost of meeting U.S. targets under the Paris accord while largely ignoring the economic benefits to U.S. businesses from building and operating renewable energy projects.

Financial Projections: how much time and money it will take to get to cash flow break - even and five year projections (best to show Yr5 mid-case, worst case and best case with key assumptions)

* Note Appended: Following comments from James Heckman, the authors made some worst - case assumptions about the long - term outcomes for these six dropouts and reassignments.

The Department will communicate scientific and technological findings by including a clear explanation of underlying assumptions, including accurate contextualization of uncertainties, and describing the probabilities associated with both optimistic and pessimistic projections, including best - case and worst - case scenarios where appropriate.

They have to work under the assumption of a worst - case scenario — what if every print sale turned into a digital sale instead, with no increase in the number of copies sold?

If Marvel needs to work under the worst - case assumption, that it will just turn print readers into digital readers without generating any new customers, then why do so in a way that gains them no money for doing so?

Show me how in the worst - case assumption (0 % investment returns over the next 7 years) your case comes out ahead.

That is probably a bad assumption in this case, after all, the proportion of Treasury issues out past 20 years is a small minority of Treasury issuance, and even with existing demand, the yield curve is quite steep.

the lowest potential yield that can be received on a bond without the issuer actually defaulting; calculated by making worst - case scenario assumptions on the issue by calculating the returns that would be received if any in - whole mandatory redemptive provisions are exercised by the issuer; partial redemptive provisions (such as sinking funds) are not included in yield to worst calculations; the yield to worst metric is used to evaluate the worst - case scenario for yield to help investors manage risks and ensure that specific income requirements will still be met even in the worst scenarios

A worst - case assumption should also be made here, since you're considering the possibility of what can go wrong.

It would be negligent not to include scenarios that are in some sense a worst case as long as other scenarios with different assumptions were also explored.

Finally, my little series there is fully justified, but not an assumption, just an example that the worst case is not even approached by David's piece.

In the worst case, nobody can later remember the purpose of a module or its initial assumptions or the coefficients used with it.

As my post here in Dec 2015 explained, the RCP8.5 scenario is useful «worst - case» scenario — but makes some unlikely assumptions to get such a high level of forcings.

This seems to me to reproduce the same old trick, of plugging in worst - case scenario projections into modelled assumptions of sensitivity of this - or - that to climate, to reveal, hey - presto, a sound prediction of what life will be like a few decades hence.

It is shown that this estimate is based on a wrong interpretation of the literature, a confusion of short - term with long - run costs, and a selection of worst - case assumptions and parameters.

That by taking your data, bad quality and all, one can conclude that the greater error lies not in the quality as much as in the adjustments of that data based on assumptions that are not agreed upon by other men of knowledge; namely, in case of further misunderstanding, the temperatures of the Medieval Period.

Seething resentment, an inability to frame an argument that isn't clumsy and repetitive abuse, opportunistic disparagement in a bad case of bad faith, noisy prattling and preening informed by superficial knowledge and astonishingly silly assumptions?

Not only are some of the values improbable many are outdated or are based of LCA models that are using older baseline assumptions and assume worst case scenarios.

When I got a good deal that I like, I shared the spreadsheet with my wife and explained to her my assumption and the worst case scenario (contingency plan / carry cost / etc).

For the ARMs I did it on the assumption that interest rates increased by the largest amount permitted by the loan contract — a worst case.