Not exact matches
Robert T. Miller
of First Things
commented that «Wielgus, long ago, did some seriously wrong things, but they were the
kinds of bad things that generally good people might do — low - level collaboration, which he probably perceived to be harmless, in exchange for things that in any decent society would have been his by right, such as the ability to travel to pursue his studies.
Your
comments are based on the
worst kind spiritual nonsense, laced with a profound level
of ignorance regarding depressive illnesses, and presented with a smug arrogance that reveals a cold heart.
i disagree, especially with your previous
comments about getting a DM who would be an «understudy» to Coquelin, i can not think
of a
worse idea, its this
kind of complacent philosophy with lack
of competition which has held us back for so long.
do u always throw sh@te from ur mouth?!!! what
kind of an Arsenal fan are u?!! all
of ur
comments are full
of hubris, sarcasm and
bad smell..!
You're not as
bad as some others here... but there seems to be some
kind of subtext going on here where people are trying to «guess» my story... tell me about myself and what I believe... or the
worst... talk about me as if I'm not here reading the
comments.
I can tell you that the creationist science is
bad and it's wrong, but I can't tell you whether they are being dishonest because that requires me to look into somebody's heart, and I can't do that, so I'm not going to make those
kind of ad hominem
comments about the opposition.»
These
kinds of cutting
comments or other ways
of lashing out in anger only make the situation
worse.
ETF for India, China, Vietnam, etc.)-- Vanguard is good; I am in process
of replacing the TD eFunds with Vanguard ETFs (I should have done it much earlier but they were under in my RRSP, it should have not mattered, the corresponding ETFs were low too)-- Big companies are good (McDonalds, Starbucks, Pfizer, WM) until they are not so perhaps I should get rid
of them and buy more Vanguard ETFs — Buying distressed companies could be a winning proposition but have I very mixed results so better not (BP and Transocean bought after the oil spill, Nortel, BlackBerry, and Nokia — BP and NOKIA good, Transocean under not much, but under, BB very, very
bad, and Nortel no
comments)-- Berkshire is very good as it is a
kind of ETF but what would happen after Warren Buffett (who would have thought AIG would need to be bailed out and the shareholders wiped out in the process or other cases where individuals brought companies down for example Barings the oldest bank in England)
Nobody is arguing that dogs should be treated
badly, kept in cages their entire lives, denied socialization with other dogs, or anything
of the sort, but to suggest that there are no commercial - scale breeders doing a good job with their dogs is a
comment that could only be made by somebody who has never taken the time to go out and spend time on the farms owned by all
kinds of commercial - scale breeders.
Other forums and
comment threads are riddled with the
worst kind of trolls.
It's
kind of sad you've probably flicked through all those articles and
comments for ages just to find a quote like that could possibly try and put me in a
bad light.
This translation
kind of gives a
bad impression about Zelda which I'd like to
comment a bit.
(I will mention that a
comment by Richard Muller that I saw somewhere, affirming Mann's
bad statistical practice, was influential, because I'm not particularly knowledgeable about that
kind of statistical analysis and I was familiar with Richard Muller from a long time ago and thought pretty highly
of him.)
Worse: maybe the reviewer offered the
comment because he knows the editor appreciates that
kind of frank feedback.