Not exact matches
Some people can't stand these
kinds of stocks — it's just too difficult to see it get beaten down, even if you believe the
bad news is temporary — but others, like Buffett, have made boatloads
of money by being patient.
Like, a lot
of bad stuff I went through — a lot
of darkness and being broke, and on principle refusing to make
money, etc. — but on the other side
of that, I
kind of feel like the universe rewarded me to some extent.
Mark, while I certainly don't think all christians are
bad, intolerant people, it's
kind of hard to ignore all the fundies running for president and all the
money religious groups are pouring into anti-gay ballot measures.
They have a way
of completely skewing things solely to make
money, and I believe those are the
worst kinds of people.
I think the moderates are the
worst kind of accommodationist, simply because they pass off the literalists as «few», the «odd crazy»... when it is these few and odd crazy ones that have the
money and the intent to change policies to «make the prophecy» come true.
Men give themselves for all
kinds of things, good and
bad, creative and destructive, for fame,
money, infatuation, homeland, religion, dogmas, prejudices.
Now whilst I agree that # 14m is not the
kind of money we would have gotten for these three White Hart Lane squad members a year or two ago, in todays market its not that
bad a deal.
Forget this Ramsey news when Hector is now courted by pep for fun and if he is reminded
of things that has changed Arsenal don't need the
money along with
kind of abuses Fabregas received from Barca fans and then also the Barca media and players blamed Arsenal for his
bad - performance even - though he did really well.
I think they need to start putting some
kind of slight ruling on where they're applicable otherwise it seems to me they're just there for when they want to guide the sport in a way that they want, or to generate
money from a
bad situation.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far
worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this
kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find
money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too
bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
In a year with a
bad map and low presidential approval, Democratic campaigns desperately need the
money, and as we've seen, they're spending it on the
kinds of activities that might make a difference in close races.
«We're saving New Yorkers
money and the reason we have to bring these suits is that the federal government has become
kind of a toxic volcano
of bad ideas,» he said.
Luckily I'll get all
of the
money back, but just having to deal with all
of that makes person feel uncomfortable and down, but I was so lucky to have the most
kindest bank worker and police officer working on my case, so... Not everything is always as
bad as it seems.
I put
money from every paycheck into a 401K, and have that set to increase by 1 % every year, but I'm
kind of bad at saving.
It's a lovely if prosaic short, better than anything Allers, late
of Open Season, has done in features, but I
kind of resented the cowardly pan up from the Dr. Zhivago / McCabe & Mrs. Miller
money shot (especially with Allers» teary 30 - second intro preparing us for
worse), and for pure schadenfreude, you still can't beat the TV version where Rudy Huxtable freezes to death.
Public - school officials, like all government bureaucrats, primarily engage in the
worst kind of spending: They spend other people's
money on children who are not their own.
An auction is now reality TV, amped up with personalities, frenzied bidding, big
money, and all
kinds of bad behavior.
**** Avoid buying a certified used car because this dealer will not honor the warranty **** **** Avoid the service department at Stevinson Toyota; they will try to take you for as much
money as they think they can get and completely lack scruples
of any
kind **** This dealership is a
bad face
of Toyota and I'm supporting Tesla et al. in their movement to remove car dealers from their legally - protected monopoly.
I did find one that was so horrible I thought it would be fun to read, but I refuse to pay that
kind of money for it because I'm not going to reward
bad writing.
I much prefer a hardback to anything, though trade paper fiction is acceptable, but with the economy sagging and my check book in even
worse shape, I just can't justify spending that
kind of money.
If they aren't using their
money to get quality covers (or
worse, they don't know what
kind of covers sell books) that doesn't bode well for your book's success.
It seem
kind of crazy that they offer big
money to get people to try them out, then offer a really
bad experience.
Doug Hoyes: Yeah, it's
kind of like okay you're a builder, you want to build a huge condo in downtown Toronto, fine, we'll let you do it, but you've got to kick in some
money to pay for the roads and the schools and everything else that the residents or your condo is going to use, you get the good with the
bad.
To make matters
worse, the auto mechanic tells you the repairs are going to cost you a small fortune, and it's the
kind of money you simply don't have.
Not a
bad deal, but if you have that
kind of money to throw around in the first place, that is chump change to you!
It makes me
kind of feel good that they're competing against each other for me, too
bad it's because they want my
money... So walking to class one day, I saw signs and flyers that UCLA was putting on an Entertainment Networking (Alumni) Night... woah!
Let's say you're out
of food and unable to get to the store, out
of money, out
of town, traveling, camping, or
worse, displaced by a disaster
of some
kind.
Money belts are outdated, awkward, and honestly
kind of a
bad at the thing they're supposed to do.
I feel
kind of bad for people who shelled out insane amounts
of money getting all the extras and plastic bits during the Kickstarter campaign.
We are not talking big bucks, but hey — making any
kind of money while you sleep is not a
bad thing
1 New York gallery flashback Markets
of all
kinds got a
bad rap this year, but New York's galleries bucked the broadsides with historical shows
of such quality and focus they gave local museums a run for their dwindling
money.
a) they don't believe the premise
of man - made climate change: they don't think scientific data collected to date is adequate to prove conclusively that any type
of man - made event can result in either the recent fluxuations in climate or the anticipated
kinds of drastic climate change, therefore CO2 control would be ineffective at solving the problem b) they don't believe CO2 alone is responsible: they think other variables are as or more likely to be the catalysts or causes for the scientific data collected to date on climate change therefore CO2 control would be ineffective at solving the problem c) they believe government efforts to curb CO2 emissions will fail resulting in an unprecedented waste
of money and
worse economic conditions.
Moreover, in the long run, courses that help lawyers do well financially prevent the
kind of desperation that may lead them to «borrow»
money from client trust accounts, or do far
worse.
A traffic ticket
of any
kind is
bad enough — the extra
money, the time spent in traffic court or diversion, the hassle.
(I had
bad experiences with 2 driving schools in the past and it was a waste
of my time and
money) He is very patient, professional and
kind!
Neither is necessarily right or wrong, you have to do what's right for you, but i have to say I believe there are 2 different
kinds of debt - consumption debt which is
bad (e.g. student loans and credit cards), which Kiyosaki calls «doo dads» and what I consider «good debt», by using other peoples
money (such as a bank) to purchase INCOME PRODUCING ASSETS (NOT speculative ones).
Along the way and even when they finally get here, immigrants are prime targets for con artists and tricksters —
bad people who take these folks as rubes for all
kinds of schemes to separate them from their
money.
I also fare
badly when I try any
kind of product placement, so there goes the
money earning potential!